The engage feature was mainly there as a demo of the capabilities of bryce. Now that we are nearing release we need to clean up our gadgets. The engage style for the luncher gadget is not complete, and does not work adequately, and quite honestly better belongs as a feature of bryce itself not luncher.
==20443== Invalid read of size 8
==20443== at 0x28CED526: _bar_exec_new_show (bar.c:980)
==20443== by 0x819D78D: _eo_evas_object_cb (evas_callbacks.c:184)
==20443== by 0xDFB6FED: _event_callback_call (eo_base_class.c:1496)
==20443== by 0xDFB7373: _efl_object_event_callback_legacy_call (eo_base_class.c:1569)
==20443== by 0xDFB743A: efl_event_callback_legacy_call (eo_base_class.c:1572)
==20443== by 0x81DC562: _efl_canvas_object_efl_object_event_callback_legacy_call (evas_object_main.c:993)
==20443== by 0xDFB743A: efl_event_callback_legacy_call (eo_base_class.c:1572)
==20443== by 0x819E1F8: evas_object_event_callback_call (evas_callbacks.c:404)
==20443== by 0x81E6B23: evas_object_inform_call_show (evas_object_inform.c:13)
==20443== by 0x81DECA2: _show (evas_object_main.c:1689)
==20443== by 0x81DF0E7: _efl_canvas_object_efl_gfx_visible_set (evas_object_main.c:1810)
==20443== by 0xDD670B9: efl_gfx_visible_set (efl_gfx.eo.c:21)
==20443== by 0x81DEA93: evas_object_show (evas_object_main.c:1639)
==20443== by 0x483706: _e_comp_intercept_show_helper (e_comp_object.c:1754)
==20443== by 0x483761: _e_comp_intercept_show (e_comp_object.c:1768)
==20443== by 0x81E7536: evas_object_intercept_call_show (evas_object_intercept.c:71)
==20443== by 0x81E7ED2: _evas_object_intercept_call_internal (evas_object_intercept.c:103)
==20443== by 0x81E88B0: _evas_object_intercept_call_evas (evas_object_intercept.c:236)
==20443== by 0x81DF0CA: _efl_canvas_object_efl_gfx_visible_set (evas_object_main.c:1807)
==20443== by 0xDD670B9: efl_gfx_visible_set (efl_gfx.eo.c:21)
==20443== by 0x81DEA93: evas_object_show (evas_object_main.c:1639)
==20443== by 0x4A6793: _e_desk_show_begin (e_desk.c:821)
==20443== by 0x4A4E39: e_desk_show (e_desk.c:312)
==20443== by 0x537C2E: _e_int_menus_clients_item_cb (e_int_menus.c:1624)
==20443== by 0x548D3F: _e_menu_active_call (e_menu.c:2056)
==20443== by 0x54ABFB: _e_menu_cb_mouse_up (e_menu.c:2789)
==20443== by 0xC636B66: _ecore_call_handler_cb (ecore_private.h:325)
==20443== by 0xC637B3F: _ecore_event_call (ecore_events.c:518)
==20443== by 0xC641158: _ecore_main_loop_iterate_internal (ecore_main.c:2397)
==20443== by 0xC63EC7E: ecore_main_loop_begin (ecore_main.c:1299)
==20443== by 0x43DE81: main (e_main.c:1081)
==20443== Address 0x20 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==21266== 3,488 (96 direct, 3,392 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10,417 of 10,680
==21266== at 0xE1E5D49: _eina_chained_mempool_alloc_in (eina_chained_mempool.c:212)
==21266== by 0xE1E5FDC: eina_chained_mempool_malloc (eina_chained_mempool.c:324)
==21266== by 0xE1A016E: eina_mempool_malloc (eina_inline_mempool.x:90)
==21266== by 0xE1A03C2: _eina_list_mempool_list_new (eina_list.c:222)
==21266== by 0xE1A11C5: eina_list_append (eina_list.c:578)
==21266== by 0x2910B667: _bar_fill (bar.c:1565)
==21266== by 0x2910D1A5: _bar_recalculate_job (bar.c:2047)
==21266== by 0xC602C2C: _ecore_job_event_handler (ecore_job.c:98)
==21266== by 0xC5FBBCE: _ecore_call_handler_cb (ecore_private.h:317)
==21266== by 0xC5FCB5D: _ecore_event_call (ecore_events.c:518)
==21266== by 0xC605EEB: _ecore_main_loop_iterate_internal (ecore_main.c:2381)
==21266== by 0xC603C99: ecore_main_loop_begin (ecore_main.c:1289)
==21266== by 0x43DD0D: main (e_main.c:1089)
==25839== 8,576 (6,432 direct, 2,144 indirect) bytes in 134 blocks are definitely lost in loss reco$
==25839== at 0xE812A41: _eina_chained_mempool_alloc_in (eina_chained_mempool.c:212)
==25839== by 0xE812CD4: eina_chained_mempool_malloc (eina_chained_mempool.c:324)
==25839== by 0xE7CCFED: eina_mempool_malloc (eina_inline_mempool.x:90)
==25839== by 0xE7CD241: _eina_list_mempool_list_new (eina_list.c:213)
==25839== by 0xE7CE044: eina_list_append (eina_list.c:569)
==25839== by 0x29E2CF07: _bar_check_for_duplicates (bar.c:58)
==25839== by 0x29E30D7F: _bar_cb_exec_client_prop (bar.c:1281)
==25839== by 0xDBD7AF6: _ecore_call_handler_cb (ecore_private.h:317)
==25839== by 0xDBD8A85: _ecore_event_call (ecore_events.c:518)
==25839== by 0xDBE1AEF: _ecore_main_loop_iterate_internal (ecore_main.c:2380)
==25839== by 0xDBDF89D: ecore_main_loop_begin (ecore_main.c:1290)
==25839== by 0x441C04: main (e_main.c:1093)
So yeah, I've literally used sed to replace every occurrence of
ecore_time_add() with ecore_timer_loop_add() because I'm reasonably
confident that no part of E has a legitimate need for timer based on the
exact current time.
It would be really nice if I'm not wrong. :)
The reason for this is the incredible spew of clock_gettime() calls I'm
seeing on an ARM system (that should have a vdso for gettime, but...)
This can amount to thousands of system calls per second.
#YOLO
Stephen Houston
Mike Blumenkrantz
Stephen 'Okra' Houston
Andy Williams
Marcel Hollerbach
Derek Foreman