Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
ce00c0157f
devs/bu5hm4n/cwd_fix
devs/bu5hm4n/fix-for-billiob
devs/bu5hm4n/next
devs/cedric/ssh
devs/discomfitor/cc
devs/discomfitor/demos
devs/discomfitor/focus
devs/discomfitor/teamwork
devs/iscaro/meson
devs/jayji/fixes
devs/lucas/wip
devs/simotek/colorschemes
devs/stefan/coverity-fixes
devs/zehortigoza/user-title
master
terminology-0.5
terminology-0.9
terminology-1.1
terminology-1.2
terminology-1.3
terminology-1.4
terminology-1.5
terminology-1.6
terminology-1.7
terminology-1.8
terminology-1.9
v0.1.0
v0.2.0
v0.3.0
v0.4.0
v0.4.0-alpha1
v0.4.0-alpha3
v0.4.0-alpha4
v0.5.0
v0.5.1
v0.6.0
v0.6.1
v0.7.0
v0.8.0
v0.9.0
v0.9.1
v1.0.0
v1.1.0
v1.1.1
v1.10.0
v1.11.0
v1.12.0
v1.12.1
v1.13.0
v1.2.0
v1.2.1
v1.3.0
v1.3.1
v1.3.2
v1.4.0
v1.4.1
v1.5.0
v1.6.0
v1.7.0
v1.8.0
v1.8.1
v1.9.0
${ noResults }
1 Commits (ce00c0157ff73db7f74e7f5d342b6282077797c7)
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
e401e87660 |
terminology can do multi instance now (in a single process). that
means 2 or 3 or more windows == same terminology process. there is a checkbox to turn it on. in theory it CAN do multipe terms within 1 windows, except there's incomplete sizing logic code for hansling step sizing and min size with multielp terms in the same window (imagine u laid them out in a table grid... all we need is a table and pack n terms in and presto.. but the sizing will be "bizarre" at the moment)... if they are packed on top of eachother like a notebook... sure - but no notebook widget and no way to sensibly display and switch... but the code infra now all supports it in theory. this is more about testing and making that infra work. first will probably be a grid layout of some sort because frankly... it's easier. but for now... lets get this multi-instance fun on the table. SVN revision: 81740 |
10 years ago |