Summary: Adding option to disable cd to current tab dir.
Test Plan:
1. Start unpatched version of Terminology.
2. Change some Behaviour options.
3. Close unpatched version of Terminology.
4. Start patched version of Terminology.
5. cd /usr/bin
6. Open new tab and verify that previous behaviour persists, new tab working directory is /usr/bin
7. Go to Settings Behaviour and uncheck "Start in the same directory..." checkbox.
8. Optn new tab and verify that new tab working directory is ~ (or any other directory from which the Terminology was launched).
9. Restart Terminology.
10. Go to Settings Behaviour and verify that options persisted.
Reviewers: #terminology, billiob
Subscribers: godfath3r, #terminology
Projects: #terminology
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3495
this makes the default (and solarized) themes have a tab bar at the
top that look and behave like normal tabs. option to disable these.
other themes might need some updating if they dont follow default by
#including it.
Summary:
Added element ot config struct to support toggling of Active Links
Added boolean to support Active Links config directive
Added configuration directive for Active Links
Return from appropriate functions if Active Links is disabled
Test Plan: Reviewers
Reviewers: billiob, raster
CC: billiob, raster
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D689
I bet I'm not the one driven crazy by them. So let's keep the bling by
default, but make it possible to override that.
In this patch I also sugest usage of tooltips on the config knobs.
How do you like it?
Enabling drag and drop on a desktop (!touch) is too cumbersome: we
aren't allowed to select part of the link anymore since it would start
the drag and drop operation.
means 2 or 3 or more windows == same terminology process. there is a
checkbox to turn it on.
in theory it CAN do multipe terms within 1 windows, except there's
incomplete sizing logic code for hansling step sizing and min size
with multielp terms in the same window (imagine u laid them out in a
table grid... all we need is a table and pack n terms in and presto..
but the sizing will be "bizarre" at the moment)... if they are packed
on top of eachother like a notebook... sure - but no notebook widget
and no way to sensibly display and switch... but the code infra now
all supports it in theory. this is more about testing and making that
infra work. first will probably be a grid layout of some sort because
frankly... it's easier.
but for now... lets get this multi-instance fun on the table.
SVN revision: 81740