getting smart changed meant another scope data get when we already had
the protected data in the caller. don't do that and just pass down.
saves a lot of overhead...
@optimize
Summary:
The cso could b NULL so we need to check if the cso is NULL or not before
dereferencing it.
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, jypark
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7075
Summary:
last function pointer indicates render_pre(),
add one more element is unnecessary.
Reviewers: #committers, netstar
Reviewed By: #committers, netstar
Subscribers: netstar, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6967
Summary:
edje_edit_object_add
edje_object_add
emotion_object_add
evas_object_xxx_add
These APIs had allowed to set parent to EFL_CANVAS_OBJECT(Evas_Object) before
8bb11a17. we should call evas_find before safety check for backward compatibility.
Test Plan:
win = elm_win_add(NULL, "main", ELM_WIN_BASIC);
1. `rect = evas_object_rectangle_add(evas_object_evas_get(win));`
2. `rect = evas_object_rectangle_add(win);`
Check that 1. and 2. works.
Reviewers: Hermet, zmike
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, CHAN, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6909
Summary:
A object that is not evas class shouldn't use evas_find. it may occurs segfault.
ref c2e8b492b1
Test Plan:
Evas *evas = evas_new();
evas_free(evas);
evas_object_line_add(evas);
Check weather there is segfault.
Reviewers: Hermet, raster, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6816
Summary:
If a smart class overrides Evas_Smart_Class.move as below,
then original behavior must not be used for the smart class.
Evas_Smart_Class sc = EVAS_SMART_CLASS_INIT_NAME_VERSION("MyClass");
evas_object_smart_clipped_smart_set(&sc);
sc.move = &myMove;
But current implementation makes original behavior work.
So before using the original method, this patch is checking if the original
method is changed or not.
Reviewers: zmike, devilhorns
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: woohyun, jypark, cedric, raster, jpeg, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6468
This reverts commit 9fcd03952e.
Just noticed from ManMower, this caused a side-effect that drops
enlightenment performance. I need to check it seriously then
decide again how this patch to be.
When map of a smart object is turned off, redraw-updation area could be incorrect.
This results in a mirror image problem.
for fixing this, let smart object request update-area in render_pre() properly only in case of map changed.
Thanks to akanad for reviewing together.
@fix
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
this commit add null check logic on evas_object_smart_attach
because a segmentation fault occurs once the argument is not valid (eg. null).
Test Plan:
1. invoke evas_object_smart_add(obj, NULL)
2. see the application crashes
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5817
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This removes the internal function pointer for scale_update. This makes
all relevant classes implement the scale API in EO.
This removes the duplicate function in Efl.Canvas.Object and only uses
the one from Efl.Ui.Base interface.
This *seems* to be working as expected. Fingers crossed!
PS: I don't like the name Efl.Ui.Base. It's an interface for a few
common API's between Gfx, Canvas and UI levels... Maybe scale simply
doesn't belong there.
Simply pass in the strbuf and don't expect the callee to own it. This
makes things simpler and safer (it'll crash only if the callee frees
said strbuf, and shouldn't leak). efl_ebug_name is new in the upcoming
release, EFL 1.21.
Realised this after talking with Amitesh. Thanks.
See 999dbd9764
And c4769ff898
This is a new function that indicates whether an object is a child of a
parent or not. Dead simple, as this simply compares if parent == this.
Note that this check was impossible to do with the event grabber.
Also, rename group_children_iterate to group_members_iterate for
consistency with the other group_member functions.
@feature
Inside emotion, if Eio is compiled, some asynchronous functions are used
and a refcounted struct was used to ensure safety of the code.
Unfortunately the logic didn't make much sense as emotion's private data
is used. The refcount becomes useless, the lifecycle of the data being
bound to the object itself.
Note that an actual crash is almost impossible because:
- eio is actually quite fast
- evas objects are kept alive for 2 frames
- eina_freeq is used to keep eo objects' data alive for some more time
But this in theory fixes the events, as they were sent on the wrong
object. "obj" is the image object, "smartobj" was the emotion object.
This is fixed with a weak ref.
I don't think it is necessary to backport this.
It's not exposing anything that wasn't already accessible before (you
could just add a member and get its clip, for instance).
This will be used by Edje Object.
This is a minor
@feature
- color_set
- visible_set
- position_set
- no_render_set
- member_add, member_del
- group_add, group_del
- clip_set
Notes:
- Widget overrides color_set without calling super() which means that
color_get() returns a different value. Also any subsequent child
object add will not inherit the color.
- Smart clipped objects also don't call super.
This patch changes that, but only for smart clipped objects created
through EO. This shouldn't have any side effect.
Introduction to the problem:
- Efl.Canvas.Group has a method member_add() to add sub objects.
- Efl.Canvas.Group (simple smart object) does NOT actually delete the
objects on deletion. But:
- Efl.Canvas.Group.Clipped is a direct subclass and WILL delete the sub
objects on deletion.
Semantically, all smart objects (at least in EO and Elementary) will own
and delete sub objects automatically. Some exceptions are:
- Edje object (smart clipped) does not delete swallowed objects.
Edje object is a "clipped" smart object but it pops out all swallowed
children before getting deleted.
- Evas box/table/grid also pop out their children before deletion.
Those classes are all legacy & internal only.
- Elm.Widget will "manually" delete all its sub objects at deletion, as
it inherits from Efl.Canvas.Group but basically takes full ownership
of the sub objects. Note that member_add shouldn't be used on a
widget, the widgets do it themselves.
Also, smart clipped objects are much more convenient to use as they will
handle some things for you: color, visibility, moving and ownership.
So, the API member_add needs to be marked as own(). But right now
Efl.Canvas.Group does not own. Thus, here's the plan:
- Mark clipped objects as such with an internal API
- Merge clipped smart object features directly inside the standard
smart object.
- Get rid of Efl.Canvas.Group.Clipped entirely and watch all hell break
loose.
Ref T5301
This is really only a demonstration of what kind of information
we can print with efl_debug_name_get(). Hopefully this can help
debugging with printf/ERR logs and even help with live debugging
inside gdb.
This shouldn't be used for other purposes than debugging, as the
exact string format is not defined.
@feature
Summary:
If user use the evas_object_smart_callback_add with no smart object,
it should be returned
@fix
Test Plan: self
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, jypark
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5056
Summary:
Earlier places in the function are testing if obj->layer is null, so
should be checked here as well before it's used.
@fix CID1371826
Reviewers: jpeg
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4707
When using smart objects (quite likely, isn't it?), the internal
layer usage count was not perfectly tracked. This was especially
true if layer_set() was called on a (top-level) smart object.
As a consequence, there could be no objects in the layer but the
usage would still be > 0. Thus, the layer was not deleted, not
removed from the inlist of layers, and efl_gfx_stack_above_get()
could return NULL as the layer above a certain object was empty.
Fixes T5201
In relative smart move, we only need to check once that the object
is indeed a valid smart object. This drops the call count from ~1.02M
to ~785k.
@optimization
Summary: this should fix some spamming in e
Reviewers: jpeg
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4675
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.andre@samsung.com>
Carsten Haitzler
Hermet Park
Shinwoo Kim
Yeongjong Lee
Yeongjong Lee
Cedric BAIL
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Wonki Kim
Mike Blumenkrantz
Amitesh Singh
Jean-Philippe Andre
Pawel Aksiutowicz
jiin.moon
Bryce Harrington
Marcel Hollerbach