Summary: this should fix some spamming in e
Reviewers: jpeg
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4675
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.andre@samsung.com>
The previous patch (b184874fa5) was preventing
post-event callbacks from triggering any form of input event,
including side-effects due to mouse,in. In fact by tracking
which exact events we want to post-process we can support
proper recursion. This fixes crashes in Bryce.
I'm not changing the documentation as this is still a dubious
code design.
Fixes T3144
Fixes T5157
See T3144 that I marked as Wontfix.
Bryce in E manually feeds events from a post-event callback
resulting in Evas going insane and leading to frequent crashes.
The ideal solution (for E) would be to ensure that everything works
smoothly, the input event data is valid up until the post-event cb
is called, etc... Unfortunately, with recursive events the exact
order of operations may be messed up: the post-event
I don't want to add yet more complexity to Evas events here (it's
already spaghetti all over the place) so I'm simply blocking any
new event feed when running the post-event callback list.
It's not possible to just freeze the events (I tried, it failed).
**********************
Some more explanation:
post-event callbacks are used to implement reverse-order logic
where the on-hold flag of an input event may be set by an event
listener that does not come first.
Here's a situation to illustrate: scroller A inside scroller B.
As events are propagated from children to parents (assuming the
propagate flag is set), we'd assume the events to go first to A
and then to B, which means a mouse wheel event would make the
inner-most scroller (A) scroll, and the outer-most scroller (B)
wouldn't budge.
But as things are designed, A and B are not simple evas objects,
and the actual event-catching object is a top-most transparent
rectangle (top-most in Z stack order). Since A is inside B, B's
rectangle BR is over A's rectangle AR, thus catches the wheel
event first. But in terms of UX we still want A to scroll, not B.
The solution then is to reverse the event processing order and
post-event callbacks are the way to do that. This comes with the
consequence that the event_info needs to remain valid until the
post-event is called, and stay the same (so that the on-hold flag
set by A can be read by B).
Recursive events (by explicit feed or modifying the canvas so
that mouse,in or mouse,out are triggered) mess with this logic,
and trigger the post-events too early (event is not fully
processed) or too late (event_info is not valid anymore... and
crash!).
Thanks @raster for explaining the goal of post-event callbacks!
This reverts commit b8beb6834b.
this now actually works... for some mysterious reason... ? :/ i am
baffled. go back in until we can find the issue then...
After a long search I found that fileselector was not calling
super.group_del on deletion, leading to the use of dangling pointers.
So let's verify that group_del is properly called.
See T4598
In this case data_scope_get is more appropriate as the data is
indeed stored on the stack (function scope) and not somewhere else.
After this last fix I see no eo_debug error logs in elementary test.
Yay! eo_debug is now usable :)
The data class should be specified for debug purposes.
Also, this fixes invalid uses inside the smart object
implementation where it assumed that the smart data was part
of the eo data. It may not (legacy objects).
This reverts commit c39855a8ac.
This actually breaks 1 dialog in e (app exited with error exit code).
it worked everywhere else so i thought it was good. seemingly not
after i saw one of these. revert D3595
Summary:
When a size calculation is skipped because of some reasons,
Evas Textblock should keep same size with the previous size.
@fix
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: raster, herdsman, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4659
A use of the post event callback in Bryce triggered a double free
as an event was being processed but not yet removed from its list,
leading to an invalid state of the Eina_List.
Also remove obj from struct as it is unused.
Fixes T5157
if its a file downloading (to a tmp location) or a zip/tar/whatever
file being extracted also to a tmp location and that tmp file needs to
be removed after ...you need to keep the obj around to know when to
delete the file. this makes the keeping optional and you query if the
vpath obj is meant to be kept or not. if it's not it's safe to del
immediately.
this cuts down 1 obj per image obj/edje obj when generally unused.
save some mem.
otherwise we would just reuse that struct. This results in
freeing/writing/reading the memory twice.
This error message should give the dev a tip on what went wrong, instead
of leaving cryptic valgrind messages and crashes.
This fixes the sysinfo desktop gadget in enlightenment.
ref T5173
when the position of the container is changed the children should also be
repositioned, so setting the changed flag.
The visual effect where you saw that was in luncher where items of the
bar did not get fully up.
it's a warning one way or another so reduce noise with a harmless case
as passing in a pit ro a 32bit type is more restrictive than the ptr
it accepts (an 8bit type)
if balue is NULL the data binding is removed and freed, but we don't
return at that point but instead fall back to using/replacing the
databinding.
this fixes CID 1369022
several calls, specifically evas_object_change_reset,
evas_object_cur_prev, and evas_object_clip_changes_clean that are
called directly or indirectly as part of evas render on at least every
active object if not more, were doing full eo obj lookups when their
calling functions already all had the eo protected data looked up.
tha's silly and just adds overhead we don't need. my test dropped
_eo_obj_pointer_get overhead in perf profiles from 4.48% to 2.65%. see:
4.48% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] _eo_obj_pointer_get
4.23% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_render_updates_internal
2.61% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_render_updates_internal_loop
1.68% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] efl_data_scope_get
1.57% libc-2.24.so [.] _int_malloc
1.42% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_smart_changed_get
1.09% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_clip_recalc.part.37
1.08% libpthread-2.24.so [.] pthread_getspecific
1.05% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] efl_canvas_object_class_get
1.01% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_cur_prev
0.99% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] _efl_object_event_callback_legacy_call
0.87% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] _evas_render_phase1_object_ctx_render_cache_append
0.82% libpthread-2.24.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock
0.81% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] _evas_render_phase1_object_process
0.79% libc-2.24.so [.] _int_free
vs now the improved:
4.82% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_render_updates_internal
3.44% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_render_updates_internal_loop
2.65% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] _eo_obj_pointer_get
2.22% libc-2.24.so [.] _int_malloc
1.46% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_smart_changed_get
1.04% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] _efl_object_event_callback_legacy_call
1.03% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] _evas_render_phase1_object_ctx_render_cache_append
0.97% libeina.so.1.18.99 [.] eina_chained_mempool_malloc
0.93% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_clip_recalc.part.37
0.92% libpthread-2.24.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock
0.91% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] _evas_render_phase1_object_process
0.84% libc-2.24.so [.] _int_free
0.84% libevas.so.1.18.99 [.] evas_object_cur_prev
0.83% libeina.so.1.18.99 [.] eina_chained_mempool_free
0.80% libeo.so.1.18.99 [.] efl_data_scope_get
of course other things "increase their percentage" as oe overhead now
dropped, and things seem to move around a bit, but it does make sense
to do this with no downsides i can see as we already are accessing the
protected data ptr in the parent func.
Jean-Philippe Andre
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Hirt
Carsten Haitzler
Stefan Schmidt
Youngbok Shin
Cedric BAIL
Ivan Furs
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri