kimcinoo
/
efl
forked from enlightenment/efl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
efl/src/lib/elementary/elm_ctxpopup_internal_part.eo

10 lines
231 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

elm: Rename elm_layout to Efl.Ui.Layout Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO usages. This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their sole purpose is to support the legacy API. Ref T5315
2017-08-07 19:48:31 -07:00
class Elm.Ctxpopup.Internal.Part (Efl.Ui.Layout.Internal.Part)
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed.
2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00
{
docs: elm_ctxpopup: fill gaps in elm_ctxpopup eo file documentation
2016-11-21 08:55:43 -08:00
[[Elementary contex popup internal part class]]
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed.
2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00
data: null;
implements {
elm: use new property implement syntax everywhere
2016-12-27 10:15:41 -08:00
Efl.Container.content { get; set; }
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed.
2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00
Efl.Container.content_unset;
}
}