efl/src/tests/elementary/efl_ui_model.c

352 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include "elementary_config.h"
#endif
#include "efl_ui_suite.h"
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
#include "efl_ui_homogeneous_model.eo.h"
#include "efl_ui_exact_model.eo.h"
#include "efl_ui_average_model.eo.h"
static const int child_number = 3;
static const int base_ints[] = { 41, 42, 43 };
static int expected_average[] = { 0, 0, 0 };
static Efl_Model *
_generate_base_model(void)
{
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
Efl_Generic_Model *base_model, *child;
Eina_Value v;
int i;
eina_value_setup(&v, EINA_VALUE_TYPE_INT);
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
base_model = efl_add_ref(EFL_GENERIC_MODEL_CLASS, efl_main_loop_get());
ck_assert(!!base_model);
for (i = 0; i < child_number; ++i)
{
child = efl_model_child_add(base_model);
ck_assert(!!child);
ck_assert(eina_value_set(&v, base_ints[i]));
efl_model_property_set(child, "test_p_int", &v);
}
eina_value_flush(&v);
return base_model;
}
static Eina_Error
_property_error_expected(Efl_Model *model, const char *property)
{
Eina_Value *v;
Eina_Error err = 0;
v = efl_model_property_get(model, property);
ck_assert_ptr_eq(eina_value_type_get(v), EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ERROR);
ck_assert(eina_value_error_get(v, &err));
eina_value_free(v);
return err;
}
static unsigned int
_property_uint_expected(Efl_Model *model, const char *property)
{
Eina_Value *v;
unsigned int r = 0;
v = efl_model_property_get(model, property);
ck_assert_ptr_eq(eina_value_type_get(v), EINA_VALUE_TYPE_UINT);
ck_assert(eina_value_uint_get(v, &r));
eina_value_free(v);
return r;
}
static Eina_Value
_child_should_succeed(Efl_Model *model EINA_UNUSED, void *data EINA_UNUSED, const Eina_Value v)
{
ck_assert_ptr_eq(eina_value_type_get(&v), EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ARRAY);
return v;
}
static Eina_Value
_child_should_fail(Efl_Model *model EINA_UNUSED, void *data, const Eina_Value v)
{
unsigned int i, len;
Eina_Value c = EINA_VALUE_EMPTY;
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, c)
{
if (eina_value_type_get(&c) != EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ERROR)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Request on child %i should have failed but got '%s'\n",
(int)(uintptr_t) data, eina_value_to_string(&c));
abort();
}
}
return eina_value_int_init(0);
}
static Eina_Value
_total_succeed(Efl_Model *model EINA_UNUSED, void *data EINA_UNUSED, const Eina_Value v)
{
efl_loop_quit(efl_loop_get(model), eina_value_string_init("BOOM"));
return v;
}
static Eina_Value
_total_failed(Efl_Model *model EINA_UNUSED, void *data EINA_UNUSED, Eina_Error err)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Shouldn't have failed: '%s'\n", eina_error_msg_get(err));
efl_loop_quit(efl_loop_get(model), eina_value_int_init(42));
return eina_value_error_init(err);
}
static Eina_Value
_children_homogeneous_slice_get_then(Efl_Model *model, void *data EINA_UNUSED, const Eina_Value v)
{
unsigned int i, len;
Efl_Model *child = NULL;
Eina_Future *all[4] = { NULL, NULL, NULL, EINA_FUTURE_SENTINEL };
Eina_Future *f;
fail_if(eina_value_type_get(&v) != EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ARRAY);
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(child, "self.width"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(child, "self.height"), EAGAIN);
}
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
Eina_Value *v;
unsigned int w, h;
v = efl_model_property_get(child, "test_p_int");
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &w);
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &h);
eina_value_free(v);
w *= 2;
h *= 3;
all[i] = eina_future_all(efl_model_property_set(child, "self.width", eina_value_uint_new(w)),
efl_model_property_set(child, "self.height", eina_value_uint_new(h)));
if (i == 0)
all[i] = efl_future_then(model, all[i], .success = _child_should_succeed);
else
all[i] = efl_future_then(model, all[i],
.success = _child_should_fail,
.success_type = EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ARRAY,
.data = (void*)(uintptr_t) i);
}
f = eina_future_all_array(all);
f = efl_future_then(model, f, .success = _total_succeed, .error = _total_failed);
return eina_future_as_value(f);
}
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
EFL_START_TEST(efl_ui_homogeneous_model_test)
{
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
Efl_Generic_Model *base_model, *model;
Eina_Value *ret__;
Eina_Future *future;
int real__;
base_model = _generate_base_model();
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
model = efl_add_ref(EFL_UI_HOMOGENEOUS_MODEL_CLASS, efl_main_loop_get(),
efl_ui_view_model_set(efl_added, base_model));
ck_assert(!!model);
future = efl_model_children_slice_get(model, 0, efl_model_children_count_get(model));
efl_future_then(model, future, .success = _children_homogeneous_slice_get_then);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "total.width"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "total.height"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.width"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.height"), EAGAIN);
ret__ = efl_loop_begin(efl_app_main_get());
real__ = efl_loop_exit_code_process(ret__);
fail_if(real__ != 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.width"), base_ints[0] * 2);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.height"), base_ints[0] * 3 * 3);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "item.width"), base_ints[0] * 2);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "item.height"), base_ints[0] * 3);
}
EFL_END_TEST
static Eina_Value
_children_exact_slice_get_then(Efl_Model *model, void *data EINA_UNUSED, const Eina_Value v)
{
unsigned int i, len;
Efl_Model *child = NULL;
Eina_Future *all[4] = { NULL, NULL, NULL, EINA_FUTURE_SENTINEL };
Eina_Future *f;
fail_if(eina_value_type_get(&v) != EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ARRAY);
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(child, "self.width"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(child, "self.height"), 0);
}
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
Eina_Value *v;
unsigned int w, h;
v = efl_model_property_get(child, "test_p_int");
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &w);
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &h);
eina_value_free(v);
w *= 2;
h *= 3;
all[i] = eina_future_all(efl_model_property_set(child, "self.width", eina_value_uint_new(w)),
efl_model_property_set(child, "self.height", eina_value_uint_new(h)));
all[i] = efl_future_then(model, all[i], .success = _child_should_succeed);
}
f = eina_future_all_array(all);
f = efl_future_then(model, f, .success = _total_succeed, .error = _total_failed);
return eina_future_as_value(f);
}
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
EFL_START_TEST(efl_ui_exact_model_test)
{
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
Efl_Generic_Model *base_model, *model;
Eina_Future *future;
Eina_Value *ret__;
int real__;
base_model = _generate_base_model();
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
model = efl_add_ref(EFL_UI_EXACT_MODEL_CLASS, efl_main_loop_get(),
efl_ui_view_model_set(efl_added, base_model));
ck_assert(!!model);
future = efl_model_children_slice_get(model, 0, efl_model_children_count_get(model));
efl_future_then(model, future, .success = _children_exact_slice_get_then);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.width"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.height"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.width"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.height"), EAGAIN);
ret__ = efl_loop_begin(efl_app_main_get());
real__ = efl_loop_exit_code_process(ret__);
fail_if(real__ != 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.width"), base_ints[2] * 2);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.height"), base_ints[0] * 3 + base_ints[1] * 3 + base_ints[2] * 3);
}
EFL_END_TEST
static Eina_Value
_child_updated_average(Efl_Model *model, void *data, const Eina_Value v)
{
Eina_Value *r;
int *ex = data;
int got = 0;
r = efl_model_property_get(model, "total.height");
ck_assert(eina_value_int_convert(r, &got));
ck_assert_int_eq(got, *ex);
eina_value_free(r);
return v;
}
static Eina_Value
_children_average_slice_get_then(Efl_Model *model, void *data EINA_UNUSED, const Eina_Value v)
{
unsigned int i, len;
Efl_Model *child = NULL;
Eina_Future *all[4] = { NULL, NULL, NULL, EINA_FUTURE_SENTINEL };
Eina_Future *f;
fail_if(eina_value_type_get(&v) != EINA_VALUE_TYPE_ARRAY);
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(child, "self.width"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(child, "self.height"), 0);
}
EINA_VALUE_ARRAY_FOREACH(&v, len, i, child)
{
Eina_Value *v;
unsigned int w, h;
v = efl_model_property_get(child, "test_p_int");
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &w);
eina_value_uint_convert(v, &h);
eina_value_free(v);
w *= 2;
h *= 3;
all[i] = eina_future_all(efl_model_property_set(child, "self.width", eina_value_uint_new(w)),
efl_model_property_set(child, "self.height", eina_value_uint_new(h)));
all[i] = efl_future_then(model, all[i], .success = _child_should_succeed);
// The model average is not updated until the property have succeeded, so we have
// to wait before we can fetch the property.
all[i] = efl_future_then(model, all[i], .success = _child_updated_average, .data = &expected_average[i]);
}
f = eina_future_all_array(all);
f = efl_future_then(model, f, .success = _total_succeed, .error = _total_failed);
return eina_future_as_value(f);
}
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
EFL_START_TEST(efl_ui_average_model_test)
{
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
Efl_Generic_Model *base_model, *model;
Eina_Future *future;
Eina_Value *ret__;
int real__;
base_model = _generate_base_model();
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
model = efl_add_ref(EFL_UI_AVERAGE_MODEL_CLASS, efl_main_loop_get(),
efl_ui_view_model_set(efl_added, base_model));
ck_assert(!!model);
future = efl_model_children_slice_get(model, 0, efl_model_children_count_get(model));
efl_future_then(model, future, .success = _children_average_slice_get_then);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.width"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.height"), 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.width"), EAGAIN);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_error_expected(model, "item.height"), EAGAIN);
ret__ = efl_loop_begin(efl_app_main_get());
real__ = efl_loop_exit_code_process(ret__);
fail_if(real__ != 0);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.width"), base_ints[2] * 2);
ck_assert_int_eq(_property_uint_expected(model, "total.height"), base_ints[0] * 3 + base_ints[1] * 3 + base_ints[2] * 3);
}
EFL_END_TEST
void
efl_ui_model(TCase *tc)
{
// This is done here as some system can not initialize computed value from another data at compile time.
expected_average[0] = base_ints[0] * 3 * 3;
expected_average[1] = ((base_ints[0] * 3 + base_ints[1] * 3) * 3) / 2;
expected_average[2] = base_ints[0] * 3 + base_ints[1] * 3 + base_ints[2] * 3;
efl_model : rename all efl_model based classes. Summary: As the result of discussion in T7458, we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence. I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43 few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming. | Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model | | Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model | | Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model | | Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model | | Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item | | Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model | | Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model | | Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model | I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used, but as I tested, there is no issue found yet. Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model, but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace, so I left it future work. Test Plan: Run the Make Test, it works well except Efl test about selection. there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model, I reported it and will fix it in another patch. Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet Reviewed By: cedric Subscribers: lauromoura Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
2019-01-30 20:35:34 -08:00
tcase_add_test(tc, efl_ui_homogeneous_model_test);
tcase_add_test(tc, efl_ui_average_model_test);
tcase_add_test(tc, efl_ui_exact_model_test);
}