eet: Stopped SPANKing the naughty programmer while deleting dictionary.

Function edje_edit_save_all cause lots of SPANK SPANK, because
eet_dictionary_free is trying to delete string that is actually not a stringshare.

Reviewers: cedric, seoz, raster

Reviewed By: cedric

CC: reutskiy.v.v, cedric

Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D322

Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric.bail@samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vorobiov Vitalii 2013-11-07 17:58:42 +09:00 committed by Cedric Bail
parent ff71f7452a
commit c3bee34c3c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ eet_dictionary_free(Eet_Dictionary *ed)
eina_spinlock_free(&ed->mutex);
for (i = 0; i < ed->count; ++i)
if (ed->all_allocated[i >> 8] & (1 << (i & 0x7)))
if (ed->all_allocated[i >> 3] & (1 << (i & 0x7)))
eina_stringshare_del(ed->all[i].str);
free(ed->all);
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ eet_dictionary_string_add(Eet_Dictionary *ed,
current = ed->all + ed->count;
ed->all_allocated[ed->count >> 8] |= (1 << (ed->count & 0x7));
ed->all_allocated[ed->count >> 3] |= (1 << (ed->count & 0x7));
ed->all_hash[ed->count] = hash;
current->str = str;
@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ eet_dictionary_string_get_char(const Eet_Dictionary *ed,
{
#ifdef _WIN32
/* Windows file system could change the mmaped file when replacing a file. So we need to copy all string in memory to avoid bugs. */
if (!(ed->all_allocated[idx >> 8] & (1 << (idx & 0x7))))
if (!(ed->all_allocated[idx >> 3] & (1 << (idx & 0x7))))
{
ed->all[idx].str = eina_stringshare_add(ed->all[idx].str);
ed->all_allocated[idx >> 8] |= (1 << (idx & 0x7));
ed->all_allocated[idx >> 3] |= (1 << (idx & 0x7));
}
#endif /* ifdef _WIN32 */
s = ed->all[idx].str;
@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ eet_dictionary_string_check(Eet_Dictionary *ed,
if (!res)
{
for (i = 0; i < ed->count; ++i)
if ((ed->all_allocated[i >> 8] & (1 << (i & 0x7))) && ed->all[i].str == string)
if ((ed->all_allocated[i >> 3] & (1 << (i & 0x7))) && ed->all[i].str == string)
{
res = 1;
break;