Summary:
if we have rainbow flag emoji (🏳️‍🌈)
we can use mouse/keyboard to move cursor inside it because we break it into two clusters, we break on 1F308,
This is wrong as we should treat emoji as a single cluster (based on rules mentioned in Unicode segmentation standard “Do not break within emoji modifier sequences or emoji ZWJ sequences” (https://unicode.org/reports/tr29/#GB11 )).
this issue happens because we don’t give 1F308 its correct grapheme break property value, I think this is a bug in the unibreak library as this Unicode 1F308 should have word break class value equals to Glue_After_ZWJ (based on https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-31.html#Glue_After_Zwj_WB and http://unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-zwj-sequences.txt) which will not make it break and we will get a single cluster.
I noticed that the current unibreak lib used in EFL seems to implement Unicode 9 (latest is Unicode 13) which uses obsolete and unused grapheme break property, such as E_Modifier & Glue_After_ZWJ, so if a new emoji introduced (rainbow flag was introduced after Unicode 9) and based on Unicode 9 it should use property E_Modifier or Glue_After_ZWJ we will have issue with it.
So I have updated unibreak lib using latest released version of unibreak (4.2) which implement Unicode 12.
I needed to remove **BREAK_AFTER(i)** to pass the tests in D1140 as spaces do not break on latest update (also related to T995).
{F3868712}
this should fix T8665 & T8688
Reviewers: ali.alzyod, woohyun, bowonryu, zmike, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: ali.alzyod
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T8665
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11743
a new shiny buildtool that currently completes in the total of ~ 4 min..
1 min. conf time
2:30 min. build time
Where autotools takes:
1:50 min. conf time
3:40 min. build time.
meson was taken because it went quite good for enlightenment, and is a traction gaining system that is also used by other mayor projects. Additionally, the DSL that is defined my meson makes the configuration of the builds a lot easier to read.
Further informations can be gathered from the README.meson
Right now, bindings & windows support are missing.
It is highly recommented to use meson 0.48 due to optimizations in meson
that reduced the time the meson call would need.
Co-authored-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7012
Depends on D7011
Summary:
Add a feature for moving cursor over a grapheme cluster.
It is applied to edje_entry.c and elm_entry.c for improving
cursor handling just like other modern text editors. ex) gedit
The patch on Evas needs to update libunibreak library.
So, the patch will update libunibreak, too.
@feature
Test Plan:
1. Put "ഹലോ" in your entry.
2. Your cursor can reach at the end of text from the beginning
only in 2 right key event with this feature.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, herdsman, zmike, devilhorns
Reviewed By: herdsman, zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers, zmike, bowonryu, woohyun
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5490
in code we importend that doesnt use eina we have warnings of
fallthroughs. all o them are commented to be fallthrough so add the
attribute there too to have fewer warnings.
This version supports Unicode 9.0 and includes many fixes.
Reference git hash: fe1ce2e78c19fa2b4b7a92b1864a12b432da6ec6
This version is not yet released, but now is a better time to sync it,
and there are no code changes expected, only "admin" work.
Main changes:
Unicode 9.0 support
Many fixes in the lineberaking algorithm to now pass the Unicode
reference test data.
@feature
Apparently the Debian package, while up to date, for some reason does
not ship the .pc file (according to q66).
According to Stefan, Fedora doesn't even have libunibreak, but only the
previous naming and old version.
Will have to wait a few years more. :(
This reverts commit a2a9f33802.
We need any version of libunibreak. The first one has been released in mid 2012.
Even slow distros like ubuntu already have an LTS out with a good enough
version, so I consider this enough to remove the maintenance cost.
This has been discussed on IRC.
@feature
Summary:
Mainly from the examples but also from libunibreak and tests/eet.
I'm not sure if it's really worth to remove warnings from the examples
-- because it adds pedantic-ness to something supposed to be didatic,
but I leave for you guys to judge.
Reviewers: tasn, cedric
CC: felipealmeida, raster, smohanty, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D896
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Stefan Schmidt
AbdullehGhujeh
Romain Naour
Carsten Haitzler
Marcel Hollerbach
Youngbok Shin
Tom Hacohen
Savio Sena