@warn_unused in syntax is now called @no_unused - this is because
"warning about unused" is a C thing (or rather, an extension to C)
and various languages might want to use stricter behavior for this.
Its associated API does the reverse now - it lets you query whether
being unused is allowed at all. This is to match future behavior
of Eolian (once it supports versioning) that will likely reverse it.
@feature
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
Summary:
If Efl.Canvas.Surface is changed from mixin to abstract, then its sub
classes do not need to inherit from Efl.Object to be a class.
Moreover, Efl.Canvas.Surface's data can be derived to its sub classes
easily.
Reviewers: jpeg, segfaultxavi, woohyun, Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7411
So, it seems my previous commit 79abba52c5 was a job
half done, as I forgot to remove Evas.Image from the inheritance
tree of all new evas image classes.
Somehow, there was code in the tree that apparently isn't tested at all, even
once - if it was, the eo.c logic that performs inheritance checks would be
triggered. I don't know how this could have happened (actually I do, it's
Cedric's fault and he should be publicly shamed for it) but these checks
make sure this will never happen again. But since the code itself appears
to be untested, I don't know if there isn't any other brokenness in it.
But that's beyond the scope of this change, so for now, let's make sure
all our inheritance is at least formally correct.
Also, enable eo_interface.eo generated code in Eo itself so that Eo.Interface
can be used when inheriting.
@fix
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
This is a bit artificial, as all image objects are still based on
the Evas.Image main class. The inheritance tree alone does not
give much information on what features are supported by which
class (eg. only Efl.Canvas.Image supports the file interface for
file_set).