Summary: remove the elm legacy name of efl ui theme
Test Plan: run elementary_test and test efl ui widget cases
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, cedric, raster, jpeg
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5934
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
No need to split: those two are used in all the same classes, since the
split between Orientation and Ui.Dir.
Note that the enum types remain in the main namespace.
Summary:
scrollable widgets had a interface_scrollable as a mixin so that the
widgets had a 'is-a' relation with interface_scrollabe. however, new
scroller concept don't have 'is-a' relationship, but 'has-a'
relationship. scrollable widgets should have a scroll manager inside
them, then scroll manager handles event from user and api
implementations. and also we cut the features such as paging because
there will be aka 'elm_pager'.
we are expecting that the new concept make us to maintain the scroller
easier. please excuse for many unorganized code and logics. : (
[contained commit]
scrollable: add efl_ui_scroller example
scrollable: refactoring for behavior in case of multiple scroller
scrollable: remove repetitive scrollbar code.
scrollable: combine calculating bounce distance code.
scroll_manager: mouse up function refactoring
scroll_manager: mouse move function refactoring
scroll_manager: warp animator wip
scroll_manager: fix denominator value when calculating flicking behavior.
Fix to disconnect bounce animator once animation is done
gather duplicated animator drop logics
gather duplicated conditions
Rearrange prototypes and append comment
Add manipulate functions for animators
scroll_manager: change member_add function.
scroll_manger: apply mirroring logic
scroll_manager: apply scrollbar
apply API to scroller widget
scroll_manager: apply scroll event callback
Change logics for all about scroll animating
efl_ui_pan: add efl_ui_pan
scrollable: change content_min_limit to match_content
scroll theme: apply overlapped scrollbar
+ many others!
Reviewers: akanad, woohyun, cedric, jpeg
Subscribers: jenkins, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5222
Note by @jpeg:
Unfortunately this patch comes in a massive single blob, after too many
rebase operations. It has now come to a point where I think the API is
nice and it works as I'd expect.
Now I only wonder how applicable this will be for Efl.Ui.List. As we can
see Photocam (legacy and unified API) could be transformed to use this
new API.
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
For this patch I decided to add a pseudo legacy wrapper as the function
is called in a very large number of places. Fixing all those calls to
use the size2d form is a lot of work and a greater risk of b0rking
something.
It was discussed a while ago that Zoomable was a poor name in some
languages, like python.
This changes, in Efl.Ui, to use underscores:
- Image.Zoomable
- Grid.Static
- Box.Flow
- Box.Stack
Zoom +/- doesn't work well as this is a multiplication factor.
Test scenario:
- elementary_test -to Photocam
Then click on the image, and press + or - on the keyboard.
@fix
This factorizes the code and makes most widgets handle key down events
in the same way:
- check that the object is not disabled, event is not on hold
- figure out the key binding based on the class name
- mark event as on hold
The class name is usually MY_CLASS_NAME but in some cases it was
MY_CLASS_NAME_LEGACY which may be different from the EO class name (eg.
elm_win vs. Efl.Ui.Win). In that case the key bindings are broken.
This breaks key bindings for the following widgets:
- Win (focus)
- Image ("clicked")
- Video (move, play)
This fixes key bindings for the following widgets:
- Nstate
Some widgets remain broken:
- Photocam / Efl.Ui.Image.Zoomable
A patch will be applied to restore the key bindings for the above
breaks.
This is an internal function that should probably become an overridable
protected method, as it's required for proper event handling in widgets.
Next step: use eo_event_info in the widgets implementations. Then remove
legacy event struct.
Ref T5363
This removes an argument that was false only for a single widget:
naviframe. Hopefully this logic is now simpler, even though it involves
a small hack within naviframe itself.
Ref T5363
image.zoomable can load edj files now.
usage:
efl_file_set(zoomable, "../somefile.edj", "mygroupname");
test:
elm_test -> photocam
click "open" btn
select an edj file, it would show first group in selected edj file.
@feature
Summary:
fix wrong initial value for ELM_PHOTOCAM_ZOOM_MODE_AUTO_FILL mode
@fix
Test Plan:
1. set zoom mode of photocam to ELM_PHOTOCAM_ZOOM_MODE_AUTO_FILL in text_photocam.c example
2. run elementary_test -to photocam
3. check it is working well
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, raster, Hermet, singh.amitesh
Reviewed By: singh.amitesh
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4921