Being able to indivually initialize individual modules was initially
"good", but at end it's putting complexities on users that would try
to "optimize" by doing just what they used, but in the end most people
would get them wrong, users would have to do lots of code and etc. At
the end it does not worth.
Most module init just register handful errors and log domains, so are
cheap. The exception is mempool users, that would dlopen() stuff, but
people that are concerned (embedded) can just compile those statically
in eina.
Since at the end any real application would use most of modules, we
actually end saving lots of function calls that would do nothing other
than increment a global counter.
I also did the init/shutdown use an array, making it easier to
maintain. The inital dependencies were analysed by a script I wrote, I
hope it's all right.
Please fix any breakages you find!
SVN revision: 42300
All these individual init functions are getting messy, some modules
lack them and it's easy to get inconsistent. Safety check needs error
and log, but these need safety checks as well, some modules (lalloc,
rbtree and others) use safety checks but provide no _init().
I want to know if we really gain something to init individual
modules. It should not be that expensive as init should not allocate
heavy resources and the recommendation is to call eina_init() so most
users will do that anyway.
If people agree I'll unmark all *_init() as EAPI and make them private
to eina lib.
SVN revision: 42214
Automatically add \n to messages. Since we use that prefix, there is
no use to allow messages without \n, it would look a mess.
Some logging systems may not require the trailing newline, for example
logging to xml or syslog, for those you don't need to ignore this char
if present.
Yes, this breaks convention, but better now than latter. And the
results are not so bad.
SVN revision: 42200
files according to the doc
* define _GNU_SOURCE before the inclusion of alloca
as features.h inclued by alloca.h, defines some
macros according to _GNU_SOURCE.
SVN revision: 41940
what is modified:
eina_counter_add -> eina_counter_new
eina_counter_delete -> eina_counter_free
eina_lalloc_delete -> eina_lalloc_free
eina_mempool_new -> eina_mempool_add
eina_mempool_delete -> eina_mempool_del
eina_mempool_alloc -> eina_mempool_malloc
eina_tiler_del -> eina_tiler_free
It remains some questions: have the following API a good name:
eina_module_list_delete
eina_list_free
eina_rbtree_delete
(see ticket #286)
If you find any problem, please report in that thread
SVN revision: 41187
safety checks will report null pointers and other error conditions on
public api's and can be disabled by compile time check.
note that in order to have these checks working we need to make
EINA_ARG_NONNULL() void, otherwise GCC can remove these checks since
they're known to be false.
This commit also make two minor changes:
* list and hash accessors and iterators are created even for empty
entities. This is correct in my point of view since NULL should
indicate error. Having these in were an optimziation, but not
worth it, these are not the most common case and hitting this path
is not of much cost.
* unmarked some parameters as nonnull, mainly on list and inlist.
SVN revision: 38327
received. It's a little huge right now, but work quite nicely.
It support "static" module, version, recursive lookup and should be able to
replace the module/plugins support in evas and ecore.
SVN revision: 35534
Carsten Haitzler
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Vincent Torri
Cedric BAIL
Lars Munch
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga