this tests for the correct event emission. And checks the wheel
interaction.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9221
View is something that is expected in the context of MVVM, so using it somewhere else is
going to lead to some confusion. Spotlight does descrive the objective of all of this
widget in actually a more explicit way as they all give the spotlight to one sub widget
at a time.
I have also renamed the View_Manager to be just Manager as the View there wasn't useful.
Summary:
Add a property (show_progress_label) to allow controlling whether the progress
label displaying the exact progress is shown or not.
This was possible in Legacy but the functionality was lost in Unified.
Updated elementary_test to showcase this property, and also the other label
formatting options, which where not tested anywhere.
Added a simple progressbar unit test. It only checks that retrieved value is the
same as the set value, so it is more of a placeholder for future tests.
**This is needed by a future patch which will introduce more formatting options that clash with the current implementation.**
The presence of a formatting function was used to decide if the progress label was shown or not. This explicit property simplifies things.
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
`elementary_test -to Efl.Ui.Progressbar` should show a few more bars with different formatting labels, and a checkbox to toggle rendering of one of them.
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, zmike, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9202
no need to manually include this for every file
Reviewed-by: Chris Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9187
It appears that EVAS_CALLBACK_FOCUS_IN / OUT is wrong here, as this is
for when a object gets focus but not the scene.
However, the inital event emission still does not work correctly, this
needs some further investigation.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9138
Radio_Group is a interface that manages that radio groups can be grouped inside a
external object, the current API of radio was considered confusing in
that regard. It is implemented in the Radio_Group_Internal class which
is private to EFL, a instance of it can be found with get due to the
class function in efl_ui_radio.eo. This architecture was taken like
this, in order to have implementation and interface seperated. With
those two seperated we can inherit from regular widgets, implement the
interface, and composite attach the internal object to the regular
widget. This makes a lot of things easier.
Radio_Box is a class which is extending Efl.Ui.Box, which has an
internal Radio_Group. This is extremly usefull for cases where you just
want to have a list of radio buttons in your UI. The radio group is also
exposed using composition to the internal object. Simular things can be
done for the table.
For now i did not add API to find the group of a radio button. However,
this can be quickly added if requested.
ref T7867
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9058
Summary:
check can only display 2 states, and is only designed to do so.
Additionally, nstate inherits from button, which
brings in autorepeat, which is hileriously broken on check and cannot
really work.
Right now there is not even support in the theme for clickable. So its a
good idea to get rid of this for now IMO.
ref T7865
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, segfaultxavi, akanad, YOhoho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7865, T7867
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9018
this widget tries to replace efl.ui.stack efl.ui.flip & efl.ui.pager
In general those widgets do the same thing, they get content. And
display them with some sort of animations. The new idea here is, that
the basic widget active_view only handles the ownership etc. of the
content that gets added to this. Then there is a view_manager object. The
view_manager object gets notified over the new contents, and requests for
displaying particular contents. The transition then handles those
things.
The version here is feature complete with Efl.Ui.Stack and Efl.Ui.Pager.
Additional features can be implemented in the corresponsing transition
classes. Examples and tests will follow
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8784
Summary:
When I add "efl_event_callback_add(btn, EFL_GFX_ENTITY_EVENT_VISIBILITY_CHANGED, _cb, NULL)",
_cb is not called. Because of callback_mask is not set correctly.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: zmike, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8528
Summary:
This patch remove evas_box function from Efl.Ui.Box_Flow and add unit test.
Depends on D8214
Test Plan:
1. make check
2. `elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'` with 'flow' checkbox.
Reviewers: zmike, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8219
Summary:
this new API can be used to get a easy to use iterator, to iterate
through all the children of a specific widget.
ref T7553
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: woohyun, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8014
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Relative_Layout is a container which allows you to position and size with
relation to each other.
it is possible to position and size using relation like edje even though
you don't know a edc script.
Position and size can be changed dynamically using widget APIs.
@feature
ref T5487
Test Plan:
make check
examples
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.relative_layout'
Reviewers: cedric, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, bu5hm4n, jpeg, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, kimcinoo
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7524
also use legacy api for elm_layout swallow test
ref T6815
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7824
this is just a copy of the existing suite but with some small changes to
use (mostly) eo apis
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7806
this should enable us to begin moving efl_ui tests into the proper suite
instead of sticking them all into elm_suite
also move grid tests to efl_ui_suite
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7765
This brings in the possibility to receive the app object from bindings.
With the app object you can listen to pause / args / terminate / resume
events.
fix T7509
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7480
individual tests should not need to explicitly call init/shutdown functions
in most cases, and many did not properly do this anyway
see followup commit which resolves some issues with eina tests
ref T6813
ref T6811
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
efl_check.h must be included and the EFL_START/END_TEST macros must be
used in place of normal START/END_TEST macros
timing is enabled when TIMING_ENABLED is set
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/improve_tests/
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
so this is then inconsistent with efl.exe and efl.thread, so go back
to being normal with 0'th arg being the binary itself jsut to make
sure we have conistent usage.
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Xavi Artigas
Mike Blumenkrantz
Hosang Kim
Yeongjong Lee
Yeongjong Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
Carsten Haitzler