Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
This disallows deeply nested pointers, you can only explicitly
ptr() on types that are strictly value types.
For a few cases where it was necessary to override this behavior,
you can use legacy(ptr(x)) as a temporary measure.
This is also another protected and beta API. Meant to be overridden by
subclasses, but belongs to a still unstable API.
The difference between the internal legacy and the EO API is really bad.
Same as with activate (previous commit).
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Summary:
elm_calendar is not subject to current automated focus policies due to internal implementation issues.
(Each date in the calendar is an edje part. )
For the above reasons, I have implemented the focus policy support manually.
Test Plan: elementary_test - calendar sample.
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, woohyun
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4421
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
elm_calendar already have minimum and maximum year set/get APIs.
I've added new APIs that exapanded from the year to the date.
These APIs help us not only set min/max month but also set min/max day.
If you set the minimum date, changing the displayed month or year if needed.
Displayed day also to be disabled if it is smaller than minimum date.
Reviewers: woohyun, Hermet, jpeg, CHAN, cedric
Reviewed By: CHAN, cedric
Subscribers: CHAN, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4226
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
There was no way to add marks on every day before event day.
The user may want to add mark something on every day before today.
(passed mark or disable etc...)
Test Plan:
Run elementary_test
Calling "elm_calendar_mark_add()" with ELM_CALENDAR_REVERSE_DAILY value.
Reviewers: cedric, Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4276
Complex types (i.e. list, array, hash, accessor etc.) now do not require
pointers with them anymore (the pointer is implied) and the same goes for
class handles. Eolian now explicitly disallows creating pointers to these
as well. This is the first part of the work to remove pointers from Eolian
completely, with the goal of simplifying the DSL (higher level) and therefore
making it easier for bindings (as well as easier API usage).
@feature
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
Sungtaek Hong
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Daniel Kolesa
Marcel Hollerbach
Jee-Yong Um
Woochan Lee
Cedric Bail
JEONGHYUN YUN
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen