better rely on the adapter and wait for realization so the adapter is
wether created or not even created but used with content. This fixes
item content focus, crashes at startup and a freeze in genlist test!
Send visible/hidden signal when text/content are realized.
This feature is already implemented in genlist widget,
for reacting dynamically in item layout depending on their
text/content realizations.
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
This prevents legacy EO classes from being exposed through .eo.h headers
or .eo in share/eolian/includes. Also removes a slew of useless xxx_eo.h
intermediate headers.
Notes:
- elm_systray has no proper API: it's not clear if the EO API should be
released (in which case it needs to be renamed to efl_something) and
there is no legacy API to create a systray object.
- Some files have been placed in a "FIXME" section, as I believe they
are necessary within EO land, but at the same time still don't
conform to the interfaces (eg. name starts with elm_).
- elm_interface_scrollable is required by photocam. This means photocam
needs to be adapted to fit the EO scroller API (still to be
completed, I believe).
Bugs:
- This breaks most C++ examples. I KNOW. And I'm working on it.
Ref T5301
#finally
For now we focus the widgets of a item, the item content can be cycled
by tab / Ctrl + tab. up/down/right/left are for now handled by gengrid
and move the focused item (everything else feels super weird with
multiple contents in a item)
ref T6181
This region has little to do with focus, as it's more of a region of
interest within the widget, and not directly related to the highlight
geometry, for instance. It's related to focus in the sense that only
widgets with focus would really care about this region.
I decided to change this name after talking with @bu5hm4n.
Note that gengrid uses this but is also completely broken (the focus
highlight floats around and you don't even see the focused item).
Note: This is very close to show_region but I'm not sure those can be
merged safely (since the default "focus_region" is NULL while the
default "show_region" is the widget's geometry).
Ref T5363
It's a complex struct but defined in EO as a simple struct. ABI-wise
it's equivalent to Eina_Rectangle. Some macros that use Eina_Rectangle
also work on Eina_Rect out of the box, most of the code dealing with
x,y,w,h will require no modifications either.
But Eina_Rect provides direct access to a size or position 2d component,
as well as the usual x,y,w,h. The field "rect" is provided as a
convenience for code dealing with both Eina_Rectangle and Eina_Rect. We
may or may not require it.
Note: Size2D could use unsigned values but I have spotted a few places
in the code that actually use -1 to indicate invalid size (as opposed to
0x0).
@feature
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
I was told that the scrollable interface is being redesigned for EO.
This API definitely does not belong to the base Widget class, as it's
quite specific to item-based scrollable widgets, such as lists and
grids. Since Elm.Interface_Scrollable is itself being revamped, it is a
good place to move that EO API for now.
Ref T5363
This is also another protected and beta API. Meant to be overridden by
subclasses, but belongs to a still unstable API.
The difference between the internal legacy and the EO API is really bad.
Same as with activate (previous commit).
Ref T5363
This factorizes the code and makes most widgets handle key down events
in the same way:
- check that the object is not disabled, event is not on hold
- figure out the key binding based on the class name
- mark event as on hold
The class name is usually MY_CLASS_NAME but in some cases it was
MY_CLASS_NAME_LEGACY which may be different from the EO class name (eg.
elm_win vs. Efl.Ui.Win). In that case the key bindings are broken.
This breaks key bindings for the following widgets:
- Win (focus)
- Image ("clicked")
- Video (move, play)
This fixes key bindings for the following widgets:
- Nstate
Some widgets remain broken:
- Photocam / Efl.Ui.Image.Zoomable
A patch will be applied to restore the key bindings for the above
breaks.
This is an internal function that should probably become an overridable
protected method, as it's required for proper event handling in widgets.
Next step: use eo_event_info in the widgets implementations. Then remove
legacy event struct.
Ref T5363
it turns out to be very handy to have a interface for the moving and
border elements, that is unconnected to the way of how widgets are
registering themself.
This for example enables us to get a simple focus manager that just
redirects the call into a internal 2 dimensional data struct
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Marcel Hollerbach
SangHyeon Lee
Amitesh Singh
Cedric BAIL
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach