when a widget is marked internal, widgets can use that to behave in
certain ways. Box for example uses this to not alter the widget_parent
property anymore. Which is usefull for when boxes are used internally.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8736
sooo, this test suite is testing interfaces. And when a content needs to
be passed into the API, a lightweight version of a widget will be passed
in. But sometimes implementations *do* requires special classes, they
can now be specified with a custom-mapping in json.
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8701
the pack interface is a general interface for how we pack things into a
container. the align and padding property has less to nothing to do with
this. Hence this commit splits the two properties into theire own
interface.
fix T7825
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8699
for now the widgets which are tested are encoded in the test files where
the tests are implemented. This is for now done in a simple json format,
just for the sake of simplicity.
ref T7815
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8685
Summary:
I forgot `efl_pack_layout_request` after relation_xxx is changed.
Unnecessary register function in `relation_xxx_get` will return unexpected result.
if a object is not child of relative_layout, `relation_xxx_get` should return
`target = NULL` and `relative = 0.0` with error message.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8627
this commit ensures the following:
- Delete content when new content is set
- Content set input validation
- Correct parent setting
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8682
This patchset ensures that the following features are supported:
- content-widget deletion on set content
- content-widget validation on set calls
- invalid cases return false
- event emission
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8681
when you inherit from widget_parent, you MUST call the super function.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8680
Remove evas_table.
This expect to improve performance by removing internal function call related
evas_table.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8615
there are no tests for Efl.Pack_Table for now, so here comes unification
for Efl.Pack tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8557
_pack_at is used to add new subobjects to the table. When a object is
already part of this table, then we should not add it again. Additional,
when there is already a gi structure, but the parent is something else,
then we should NOT just reuse this struct, otherwise we might use a
struct reference that we do not own. The struct could be owned by
another table widget.
The test must be adjusted, before we did not error on adding a widget
twice. Now we do (just like in box). Hence we should not do that in
test.
Reviewed-by: YeongJong Lee <yj34.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8554
We have two elementary test suite, what is more obvious than just adding
a third one! This testsuite aims for establishing a standard behaviour
for the interfaces we have added in efl now. This first part here brings
a few testcases for Efl.Pack which are currently only passing for
Efl.Ui.Box. More widgets will be added afterwards.
The testcases themself are not defined after what worked or did not
work, but rather what made sence (in my opinion ^_^).
ref T7767
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8518
Remove legacy stuff from Efl.Ui.Box.
This expect to improve performance by removing internal function call related
evas_box.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8417
Summary:
When I add "efl_event_callback_add(btn, EFL_GFX_ENTITY_EVENT_VISIBILITY_CHANGED, _cb, NULL)",
_cb is not called. Because of callback_mask is not set correctly.
Test Plan: unit test
Reviewers: zmike, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8528
Summary:
this test fails on travis, for the sake of the release we continue
without this tests, after the release we can enable this again with or
without failing tests.
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8538
Summary:
log level=2 is the warning level, which is not super useful since
there's currently billions of eo warnings occuring in every function
call
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: cedric, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8515
the problem with the previous implementation (just redirect the calls to
the widget_parent then to the efl_parent is that after invalidate its
impossible to find the window where the widget is in. However, there are
cases where we want to have access to the window of the widget, for
example, to invalidate focus highlight etc..
The window of a widget is always constant, and cannot be changed (as the
evas object cannot hop accross different evas)
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8475
before the refactoring of the disabled property, there was no way to
enable a widget which has a disabled tree. This here however enables
this to work again like this. The user will be told with an error
message. The integraty of the property is maintained accross reparents.
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8459
this just adds more coverage over the behaviour of efl_ui_widget
properties.
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8458
when a mouse cursor is over a slider, the mouse wheel should be used to
affect the state of the slider, not also the one of the slider.
ref T2529
Reviewed-by: Bowon Ryu <bowon.ryu@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8455
The test was not expecting both callback to be set when the wait loop
was started. By moving them around, it fixes the test case to only have
one relevant callback set at a time.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8490
so after a phone call, two days of debugging, tears, crying etc. etc. we
finally came to a point of enlightenment! *Someone* (bu5hm4n) moved
gengrid and genlist events from eo back to smart events, so we can work
arround legacy borks and event-name collisions, at this point he did not
knew that some widgets (fileselector) already relied on those *lovely*
events. Hence this broke theoretically the testsuite, however, the
fileselector testsuite is ultimatily buggy, and the wait function does
not return false when it timeouts, (i don't know why not). So this break
was never discovered.
Additionally there is a second issue. it appears, that when we
immidiatly quit the mainloop after we have got the selected callback,
that then genlist decides to forget about the sd->selected pointer, and
NULLs that one out. Which then results in the fact that
elm_fileselector_selected_get ends up returning invalid paths.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8488
Summary:
behaviors of elm_entry has been changed
so that this patch provides usages to keep as a test case.
Reviewers: zmike, Hermet, YOhoho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8483
Summary:
Before b3327c761e, -1 was returned on`elm_win_rotation_get`, if `obj` is NULL.
This fixes backward compatibility.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8474
this crashes immediately and showcases the current infinite recursion issue
in elm_entry which is triggered by clicking any entry for $longpress_timeout
ref T7202
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8440
in very specific cases it's necessary to match the exact timing of
internal functionality, so add a function to provide that capability
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8439
elm_win has some internal locking to avoid doing sizing and visibility
changes until pre-render to save some calculations. this makes triggering
ui events on objects impossible, as they will not be visible.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8438
Add test cases for efl_access_object_reading_info_type_set and efl_access_object_reading_info_type_get
APIs
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8427
Add attribute_del API, currently there is no provision to delete a particular attribute(key-value pair)
from the attribute list of a widget.
Add test cases for efl_access_attribute_append, efl_access_attributes_get, efl_access_attribute_del and efl_access_attributes_clear API
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Reviewed-by: Shinwoo Kim <cinoo.kim@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8386
Summary:
Since we're now going to be shipping some eo classes as stable,
there is no point in keeping the eo api behind a macro, and it
should be enabled by default. Another case is beta classes, but
those are behind the EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT guard.
This also changes includes around the place where things are
clearly broken (such as an included header needing something
from another header but that other header being guarded, notably
efl_ui_widget.h needing focus manager but focus manager being
behind beta in Elementary.h)
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, bu5hm4n, stefan_schmidt, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: cedric, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8322
Summary:
we should check if the header actaully compiles without the beta
defines.
Depends on D8342
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8343
It seems that theme_apply in sub_object_add haven't worked since commit
f6fa1ef612.
scale, theme property will be set properly when the parent is changed.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8283
This reverts commit 0e027980f6.
Since D7888 breaks the backward compatibility, D7888 is going to be
reverted. This patch is based on D7888 so this patch is also required to
be reverted for now.
After a proper patch is applied instead of D7888, then this patch can be
submitted again.
It seems that theme_apply in sub_object_add haven't worked since commit
f6fa1ef612.
scale, theme property will be set properly when the parent is changed.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8283
Summary:
This enables all the checks unconditionally, without ignoring
classes that don't have an Efl namespace. This required a lot
of beta marking to make it build. It most likely doesn't
mark types correctly, as that is not fully enabled yet.
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8266
Summary:
in was not very descriptiv, move_in was concluded to be more descriptive
ref T7726
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7726
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8270
Marcel Hollerbach
Yeongjong Lee
Yeongjong Lee
Cedric BAIL
Christopher Michael
Hosang Kim
Mike Blumenkrantz
Wonki Kim
Shilpa Singh
Daniel Kolesa
Jaehyun Cho