this is used for storing the position and size of the widget. However,
just in elm_test this eats 2KB of ram, just for saving them. The cases
where they have been used do not seem like a great performance hotspot,
additionally, in the panel cases the privat data of the widget is
achived anyways, so eo is involved and we are spending some time there
anyways.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9646
walking here the parent chain can be very costly, esp. if you make a lot
of widgets visible or hide them. With this commit we ensure that we only
walk the parent chain when there is a custom chain, which is only the
case in legacy. This gets us about 2-3 FPS on the rpi with the
item_container benchmark.
With earlier commits, tree_unfocusable and disabled is honoring the
whole parent chain, so checking that alone, without the parent chain, is
fine.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9645
Before this patch tree unfocusable set just set a simple flag, getting
this state however forced you to traverse the whole parent chain to get
the real result.
With this patch the setting of the unfocusable flag is heavier as it
walks all the children of the widget, however, the getting of the flag
is way easier now. The next revision will refactor the focus related
APIs for that.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9644
asking for a parent provider only makes sense if we are having a custom
focus parent provider, otherwise this will just result in the normal
parent relation. Not doing this safes us a lot of time that we spent for
nothing in the focus evalulation code.
The gengrid change is needed as the parent provider should be applied
after the constructor is called, otherwise there is no garantee that
shared_win_data is not NULL.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9643
this introduces a shared place to all widgets. The shared pointer is
allocated in the window, as the window outlifes every widget that is
part of it.
This struct will be later used for further optimizations like:
1. There are really heavy focus operations which are only needed for
gengrid/genlst, there is no point in executing them if there is no
gen**** added to the window object. So we can skip the custom
parent_provider logic that is only introduced for gengrid / genlist.
2. Legacy focus APIs must do list walks, which means, on every focus
operation we always have to walk the full list up to the parent, which
is annoying and slow, as we *most of the time* do not use legacy focus
API.
This list can be continued, the above two cases are fixed in the next
revisions.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9642
calling geometry set here is again calling the API in canvas object that
splits this call to size_set and position_set which means we spent quite
a bit of time in eo, just to call the same APIs we could call directly.
With this commit here, the calls are directly going to the right
objects, with the right API.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9619
Summary:
historically there have been two methods of calculating sizes in elm:
* elm_layout_sizing_eval
* evas_object_smart_calculate (now efl_canvas_group_calculate)
the former was used to set size hints on widgets, while the latter was
used to perform internal size calcs for the widget. for things to
work correctly, these functions had to be triggered in just the right
order at just the right time. many hard-to-fix bugs related to widget
sizing over the years have been the result of this split
this patch removes elm_layout_sizing_eval implementations so that all
widgets perform both internal size calcs and size hint setting all
in the same function, ensuring that these are always in sync
the result is that in the vast majority of cases, far fewer recalcs
happen for widgets, and they are quicker to achieve their final size
Depends on D9438
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: bu5hm4n, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_widgets
Maniphest Tasks: T8059
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9439
somehow it was never checked to see if a parent was being added as a subobject
of a parent's own child object (recursive hierarchy)
@fix
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9333
This is done to simplify code as you only need to set the model on the
provider and all the widget that are using it as a provider will automatically be
updated. The child will find a provider during at the time the first property binding
is set on the widget by checking if the parent have an Efl.Model_Provider set. It is
not necessary to set a model to have a valid lookup on a Efl.Model_Provider. To disable
a widget lookup, you can just force set a model on it (even NULL) and it will disable
the lookup.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9290
there is a very basic problem in eo events. We are having one central
array of event subscription, if for example a widget is now listening to
changes in its parent, then we are 100% asking for trouble.
As an example:
- A scroller with 100 buttons in it.
- Every button will have a subscription to the FOCUS_MANAGER_CHANGED
event
If you now scroll, the position is updated in the scroller, therefore
the position in scroller is updated. This has the result that the whole
list of 100 event subscriptions is walked, which is obviously bad,
however, this solution here is way easier than fixing eo (i am not even
sure there is a nice solution to it).
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9324
when a logic parent does not have any widgets left, the parent needs to
be reevaluated. However, this only has to happen when there is a change
in state (eg. from 0 -> N or from N -> 0). Every other call can be
safed. This commit introduces this checking, and safes up performance.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9323
checking part type and part geometry is pretty common, so these base
implementations can fill in gaps in existing functionality
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9317
this commit ensures 2 things:
1. This ensures that the parent is not evaluated when there was no state
changed, this cuts down roughly 30% of the calls to full_eval
2. This ensures that we only listen to parent manager changes when we
are actaully registered. This reduces the amount spend in event emission
a lot.
Summary:
no need to update access info for dead objects
@fix
Depends on D8983
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8984
when a widget is marked internal, widgets can use that to behave in
certain ways. Box for example uses this to not alter the widget_parent
property anymore. Which is usefull for when boxes are used internally.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8736
since commit a1addad60e, To add myself as a sub object of parent object will be
done in Efl.Ui.Widget constructor.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8280
we are calling visible_set on them later on, this will drop errors,
additionally this safes us from checking this in the widget-container
code.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8520
Summary:
The efl_ui_widget_disabled_set calling even the state is not change when widget create and destroy.
It broken backward compatibility.
T7799
@fix
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8600
this resolves a lot of cases where focus_highlight API was called on a
object, which is not a efl_ui_win object. With this patch we ensure that
the object is always a window.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8476
the problem with the previous implementation (just redirect the calls to
the widget_parent then to the efl_parent is that after invalidate its
impossible to find the window where the widget is in. However, there are
cases where we want to have access to the window of the widget, for
example, to invalidate focus highlight etc..
The window of a widget is always constant, and cannot be changed (as the
evas object cannot hop accross different evas)
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8475
before the refactoring of the disabled property, there was no way to
enable a widget which has a disabled tree. This here however enables
this to work again like this. The user will be told with an error
message. The integraty of the property is maintained accross reparents.
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8459
Summary:
the difference here is, that the macro before did not print ERR's the
one now does. Hence this commit remove two error messages.
Reviewers: devilhorns
Reviewed By: devilhorns
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8415
Summary:
the difference here is, that the macro before did not print ERR's the
one now does. Hence this commit remove two error messages.
Depends on D8394
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric, devilhorns
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8395
It seems that theme_apply in sub_object_add haven't worked since commit
f6fa1ef612.
scale, theme property will be set properly when the parent is changed.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8283
It seems that theme_apply in sub_object_add haven't worked since commit
f6fa1ef612.
scale, theme property will be set properly when the parent is changed.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8283
efl_ui_widget has a property called widget_parent. The setter for this
function is called is exactly once, and this is within the constructor,
to a value which is not even set to the actaul field parent_obj. Which
shows, that in the sitation right now, the setter of the property is a
bit disconnected and lags some real aspects.
As we are heading towards eo-api stabilization we should beat some sense
into this setter, as people using our classes might overwrite the setter
and except calls to it, whenever the widget_parent is changed, and
implementation as in elm_menu show that this might makes sense sometime.
In order to achive this, the sub_object registering code of elm is
adjusted a bit.
sub_object_add/del is now used to differenciate between evas objects and
efl.ui.widget objects as subobject. In case of a widget, the
widget_parent of this object is set, most of the widget specific code is
then executed in the actaul setter. In case of an evas object, the
parent reference is added. In the end both end up in the subobject
children list. The later is also a requirement for widget_parent_set to
be successfull.
ref T7553
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8031
This means that all property that are registered in the reflection table of
any Eo class will be available for binding with a model. This will increase
the amount of useful binding quickly.
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7941
this is a legacy header so it can't include (non-installed) eo headers
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8229
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8209
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8148
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8131
Summary:
now that the error codes have been change to be compatible with eina_error,
this can be removed and will work through eina_error naturally
fix T7718
Depends on D8067
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8068
Summary:
this can be mimicked with efl_provider_find as the top widget should
always be efl.ui.win
ref T7553
Depends on D8063
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8064