This improves a rare error message when a function is called on an
efl_part() that does not implement it. Example: calling a swallow
function on a non-swallow part.
This isn't entirely fool-proof but should already help quite a bit.
This also changes how the efl_part proxies are stored: the variable
is not reset to NULL every time we use it, instead we check it in
the del intercept.
Note: _part_reuse_error() can not be enabled inside
_internal_proxy_get because there are valid use cases such as:
func1(efl_part(obj, part), func2(efl_part(obj, part), ...), ...)
Here we use two efl_part() at the same time, on the same object,
but we haven't entered "func1" yet when we are reaching the second
call to efl_part(). This is completely valid and there is pretty
much no way to detect this.
I think I will improve this later with a core function on
Efl.Object like "debug_string".
Ref T5584
This focus on the domain and ID bits is very confusing. Let's
keep it at the end of the message, and also try to guess whether
the object may have been deleted or simply doesn't belong to the
current thread.
Forgot to consider the edje object's offset when porting the code
to efl_part (see 98dad1a52b).
This fixes a few bugs, one of which is region_show for the scrollable
mode.
See 4e79dd0f02
That patch was absurd. Do not change the use of a legacy stable
API when you change an EO API. If you need to do that then there
is very clearly a problem in the patch.
This reverts the test case to use the legacy API (which in turn
calls the EO API anyway so both are tested).
Fixes T5587
As we may have both a pointer and touch device on a given system, we
need to accurately set event->device when sending mouse move, wheel,
down, and up events. Previous code here would always try to find a
mouse device first which could potentially end up setting the wrong
event->device (if a touch device also existed).
This patch fixes the issue by comparing the window used for the event
to our focused windows (either mouse or touch) and setting the proper
event->device based on that.
@fix
Signed-off-by: Chris Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
Summary:
The patch was created for EFL 1.18. But, it was merged for EFL 1.20.
@fix
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: herdsman, jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4968
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
We are not providing a font to test that specific script.
Commenting-out this test until we can find one with proper license.
This fixes the test suite fail case.
@fix
Need to handle this with special care as Efl.Text.Cursor is used in
some functions that are specific to Efl.Canvas.Text, was well as
functions in Efl.Text.Cursor interface.
Value-based alignment (e.g. 0.5, 0.3 etc) isn't very practical.
Horizontal and vertical alignments will be assigned with enums
"left", "center", "right", "auto", "locale", for horizontal alignment,
and "top", "center" and "bottom" for vertical alignment.
This changes the previously added "halign" and "valign" properties.
Summary: There is no name of event for "shrink,state,changed"
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4969
Summary:
The expand state changed callback has been called when layout property changed and other reason.
Even expand state is not changed.
So we need to check the current view state to call expand changed callback.
(We can't prevent calling the _shrink_mode_set() function. It needs to call the re-arrange internal items.)
Test Plan:
elemenatay_test - multibuttonentry.
Check the shrink, expand state.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4970
Summary:
This completes the documentation for Ecore_Evas for all (non-deprecated)
APIs.
Note that ecore_evas_software_16_ddraw_new, ecore_evas_direct3d_new,
ecore_evas_gl_glew_new, and ecore_evas_sdl16_new are left undocumented
because while they're not declared as deprecated their implementations
are either missing or marked as obsolete or legacy. I suspect a few of
the remaining routines are likely also obsolete but I added
documentation anyway.
Reviewers: cedric
Subscribers: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4972
First steps toward explicit function pointer support in eolian.
To declare a function pointer type, use the following syntax, similar to
a regular eolian method declaration.
function FunctionName {
params {
...
}
return: Return type
}
Summary: Signed-off-by: Sanjeev BA <iamsanjeev@gmail.com>
Test Plan: Test with edi.
Reviewers: ajwillia.ms, jpeg, cedric
Reviewed By: ajwillia.ms
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4971
this was originally intended to allow some code to be moved out of the
compositor, but the idea turned out to be unfeasible since multiple
display backends need to be supported and not all related components
will provide similar functionality
with async device init, it's possible for mouse in/out/move events to be added
by an application before the pointer devices are created. these are independent
of devices, so store the state and apply when pointer devices are added
fix T5531
Amitesh Singh
Jean-Philippe Andre
Stefan Schmidt
Daniel Hirt
Chris Michael
Vincent Torri
Sanjeev BA
Cedric BAIL
smohanty
Youngbok Shin
Lauro Moura
Woochan Lee
Bryce Harrington
Jeeyong Um
Felipe Magno de Almeida
Andy Williams
Mike Blumenkrantz