Summary:
api naming in efl uses 'del' when deleting an object and 'remove' when
removing something from an object
ref T7554
Depends on D8034
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7554
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8035
focused_item is only used in item containers. This API is now moved into
a widget item container, which *can* have a focused item.
ref T7553
Reviewed-by: WooHyun Jung <woohyun0705@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8013
it was decided that this property should be internal. So now it is
internal.
ref T7555
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8010
Summary:
This "moved" event is only used by elm_gengrid now.
And it's not something common for all widget classes,
because the event is giving notification when the legacy
item is reordered.
ref T7553
Test Plan: elementary_test "GenGrid"
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, YOhoho, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n, YOhoho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8005
this existed only to provide the methods for Efl.Ui.Layout_Part and fill
in implementation for some legacy functions which should probably not be
supported going forward
the corresponding methods have been merged into efl_ui_widget and the
legacy functions no longer use eolian-generated implementations
Reviewed-by: WooHyun Jung <woohyun0705@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7899
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
Summary:
These constructors aren't checked for in the finalize step of the
initialization and may be given the @optional tag.
For C# this means they can be ommitted from the constructor call.
This also adds `Efl.Ui.View.model` as a constructor of
`Efl.Composite_Model` as the finalizer checks for it.
Fixes T7673
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Maniphest Tasks: T7673
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7855
Summary: Despite being required as a use case for C# constructors, style is not yet listed as a constructing property.
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, Jaehyun_Cho, segfaultxavi, zmike, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: felipealmeida
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7793
Previously, legacy name of this property was "elm_widget_parent_set".
But, in efl_ui_widget.eo.legacy.h, it's current name is
"elm_widget_widget_parent_set" which is not matched well with
"elm_widget_parent_get" at all.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7666
If we are to choose Efl.Ui.I18n for the internationalization support, the localization API
should be named accordingly L10n.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7507
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Theme class is required to support language bindings.
Efl.Ui.Theme works based on current elm_theme features.
This patch fixes T7357.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, lauromoura, woohyun, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: SanghyeonLee, herdsman, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7357
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7244
Summary: I had fixed some typos and some wrong expressions in API reference doc
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: raster, zmike, Hermet, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6943
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Summary:
All events must have a type now, otherwise bindings don't know how to handle
the event_info field.
Most of the missing event types were actually "void" (no event_info present).
Some struct definitions had to be moved to eo instead of h files, so they
are available to bindings. Some have not, and are marked with FIXME.
Some namespaces have been fixed (like Efl_Event_Cb -> Efl.Event_Cb).
In general, there are hundreds of changed files, but mostly to add a type which
was not present before, so there's no harm done.
Also, A lot of FIXMEs have been added which should be, like, fixed.
For example, some events can send different types of event_info, which is
very inconvenient (and error prone).
Test Plan: make with c# bindings works, make check and make examples work too.
Reviewers: cedric, q66, lauromoura
Subscribers: zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6169
Summary:
The mixin encapsulates the correct
- creation
- composition attaching
- Lifecycle handling
of the focus managers that are assosiated with the object.
This fixes error messages on shutdown, and additionally lifetime issues
where the composite_attached object was deleted before the object was
deleted.
Reviewers: cedric, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6108
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
This was proposed by Dave on the ML, I think it makes sense. Right now
the enum is just like the boolean, feature-wise, but it makes more sense
semantically (mode is not a bool) and allows for future extension (eg.
only apply orientation update for landscape vs. portrait modes).
There is absolutely zero testing for this in our existing codebase. Yay.
Summary:
focus_user and focus_object are similar classes. by merging them into
one mixin, we can maintain consistency.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5734