This prevents legacy EO classes from being exposed through .eo.h headers
or .eo in share/eolian/includes. Also removes a slew of useless xxx_eo.h
intermediate headers.
Notes:
- elm_systray has no proper API: it's not clear if the EO API should be
released (in which case it needs to be renamed to efl_something) and
there is no legacy API to create a systray object.
- Some files have been placed in a "FIXME" section, as I believe they
are necessary within EO land, but at the same time still don't
conform to the interfaces (eg. name starts with elm_).
- elm_interface_scrollable is required by photocam. This means photocam
needs to be adapted to fit the EO scroller API (still to be
completed, I believe).
Bugs:
- This breaks most C++ examples. I KNOW. And I'm working on it.
Ref T5301
ecore could not shut down properly in an elm_init()/elm_shutdown()
cycle, with 7 remaining references, all because of a typo.
This should help @cedric as well
This moves the API entry points from Widget to Layout parts. I don't
think the other widgets support translation, but that is easy to fix.
The actual code implementation remains in elm_widget.c.
Legacy-only widgets are covered by Part_Legacy, while all EO widgets
that have text inherit from Layout (except Win but I don't think the
window title was translatable in legacy).
This removes 2/3 remaining part APIs from Widget.
Ref T5363
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
I was told that the scrollable interface is being redesigned for EO.
This API definitely does not belong to the base Widget class, as it's
quite specific to item-based scrollable widgets, such as lists and
grids. Since Elm.Interface_Scrollable is itself being revamped, it is a
good place to move that EO API for now.
Ref T5363
1. Uniformize the API, which is now for internal use:
This uses the same enum as scroller "movement_block" instead
of 2 separate properties. Less APIs, more consistence.
2. Remove scroll_lock x/y from EO widget. I was told it is not going to
exist in the upcoming scrollable interface.
3. Remove scroll hold/freeze getters.
scroll hold/freeze push/pop are still there but it remains to be seen
how the EO scrollable interface will exploit them. Right now they are
full of bugs.
Ref T5363
This also includes the drag_child_lock APIs. This had nothing to do with
dragging beyond maybe the case where scrolling is done by thumbscroll
(ie. finger drag).
Note that the EAPI were called already scroll_lock, not drag_lock.
Ref T5363
... and others. this leads to crashes if x ops are busy in a thread or
engine evas thread shutdown happens to call engine calls that then do
x calls... should apply in general to wl too. fixes some segv's on
shutdown given the new gl thread patches.
@fix
This is, unlike what some of the documentation says, a public
API on elm_object. Let's place it along mirrored for consistency,
even if edje object will not implement it.
Ref T5363
fix CID 1360466
we don't actually chekc if efreet inits right with elm_need_efreet()
as we just assume it inits (And there pretty much is no case where it
will not), but make coverity happy and check.
@fix
This reverts commit 57d77c9041.
We are in freeze right now and this is a new feature. Considering the access
API is still in beta I might have let this slip by but its does not even build
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: error: conflicting types for ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
In file included from ../../../src/lib/elementary/Elementary.h:240:0,
from ../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:6:
../../../src/lib/elementary/elm_object.h:521:54: note: previous declaration of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ was here
EAPI Evas_Object *elm_object_part_access_object_get(const Evas_Object *obj, const char *part);
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c: In function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’:
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:47: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: expected ‘int’ but argument is of type ‘Evas_Object * {aka struct _Eo_Opaque *}’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:13: error: too many arguments to function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: declared here
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:11: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
Makefile:43996: recipe for target 'tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o' failed
make[5]: *** [tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o] Error 1
If you still want this in make sure it actually can compile the tests you added.
Summary:
if trying to apply incorrect theme, widget apply default theme and return TRUE.
so there is no way to check it really apply correct theme.
To resolve this problem, _elm_theme_set return three type enum
* related history : 4ca3ef4514
* elm_object_style_set is public api, so I didn't change it.
* typedef name [ Theme_Apply ] is temporarily, please suggest better one.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, cedric, jpeg, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4073
Cedric BAIL
Jean-Philippe Andre
Marcel Hollerbach
Marcel Hollerbach
Vincent Torri
Carsten Haitzler
Daniel Zaoui
Andy Williams
Tom Hacohen
Stefan Schmidt
Chris Michael
Shinwoo Kim
Jinyong Park