When changing cursors under wayland sometimes we'll see the old cursor
moved to the new hotspot briefly before the cursor changes. This makes
that suck less often.
A proper fix would involve creating a new wayland surface for every
cursor change (actual change, not just a new frame of an animated
cursor). Given the current internals this is invasive. Do the
easy thing for now.
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
also implement Efl_Canvas.objects_at_xy_get
note that any function which returns an iterator cannot be @const since
it's necessary to wref the object to ensure the iterator's lifetime
at least terminology was broken by this. perhaps other efl apps. if an
efl app has decided to manually play with focus itself, like set focus
to some obj then leav ie, this line breaks that and interferes with
the object focused whenever the window gets focus set. if there is a
focus manager at least this is a new thing and so let the focus
manager set focus, but dont set old evas focus.
this fixes the break added in 56beb861e8
it seems that focus changes to FOCUS=FALSE are causing autodel windows
to kill themself, so we only set the focus on the window if the window
manager calls focus in AND we dont have anything to focus and nothing is
focused yet.
Window constructor is hijacked by the finalize method, which messes up
the normal order of operations. As a result, the legacy type name for a
window object was "elm_widget" rather than "elm_win".
This fixes a crash in E (as it checks the legacy type name to verify an
object's type).
See D5748
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Summary:
parent_get and smart_parent_get are called in parent_widget_get
this also remove the duplicated code
Reviewers: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5757
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
Unless it's implemented for Wayland as well, AND provides more
information than a NULL event_info, I see no point in this being an EO
event. Keep legacy as-is: a smart callback only.
Also, minor cleanups to the EO file.
Ref T5322
in the case where a connection was not actively rendering, there was nothing
which would trigger a display flush, leading to applications potentially
deadlocking
@fix
Summary:
- Previous class efl_ui_bg moved to efl_ui_bg_widget.
- Scale_type moved to efl_image from efl_ui_image.
- Previous enum Efl_Ui_Image_Scale_Type moved to Efl_Image_Scale_Type.
Test Plan:
Run elementary_test
1.Image Scale Type
2.Efl.Ui.Bg
3.Efl.Ui.Win
4.Part Background
Reviewers: jpeg, woohyun, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5616
new eo widgets(efl_ui_ prefix) finds new edc group in
data/elementary/themes/edc/efl/*.edc.
New group name is "klass/group:style" and "base" group name and
"default" style name can be omitted.
for now, separator for style is ':' but needs to be decided.
This function will destroy non-wayland engine data, so it should
make sure it's actually operating on a wayland window.
Originally the sd->wl.win test was sufficient, but now wl.win is
present on non-wl windows to facilitate cut and paste, so we need
to check more thoroughly.
The problem with the API is that it uses an array of ints, which is not
well defined in EO. We could set an array of pointers to int, but that
would be super awkward to use.
I believe the original API has been slightly over-engineered as it was
passing an array of available rotations when in reality only 4 rotations
could be supported (0, 90, 180, 270). It seems to me that the day
arbitrary rotation needs to be allowed, another API would be required
(maybe with a range, or a single bool flag to allow anything).
I have not modified the internal code, which still uses an array (as
ecore evas uses that).
Mote: ec464939d9 removed wm_rotation_supported_get(), as well as
the preferred rotation from EO, but they could easily be added back if
needed.
Note 2: I couldn't test as desktop E doesn't support WM rotations.
Ref T5322
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
Summary:
On window rotation send bounds changed signal to inform ATSPI client
about the orientation of window
Test Plan:
In ATSPI mode, when orientation of efl window is changed, ATSPI client should
get notification
Reviewers: kimcinoo
Subscribers: cedric, govi, rajeshps, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5469
Note: this is C only, not legacy only.
The problem is that bindings will hold a strong reference to the window,
which will then die "under the rug" if autodel is enabled. This then
leads to at least ERR if not crashes.
Note:
elm_policy needs to support autodel and quit on last del only for C
applications. Bindings will require some other mechanism that doesn't
break all assumptions wrt. references.
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
This isn't meant to be installed. The canvas API in EO is based around
the interfaces Efl.Canvas and the widget Efl.Ui.Win. Anything else is
not EO (eg: ecore_evas, evas, ...)
Note: evas_canvas3d is the last remaining thing that is installed along
EO files, but those are all beta APIs.
OMG... I do not like this patch.
See T6148, two key down events are received when a key grab is installed
on a Win object. This is because all input events are propagated from
ecore all the way up to win and can be listened on. Unfortunately this
breaks existing applications that use the key grab API properly to
listen to key events.
Another side effect is that ALL key events are received by the window,
which means it's not limited to what the application expected (from its
list of grabs).
Solution (ugly): block propagation of key down/up events if the window
is a legacy window. This means that no key grab is required for EO
windows, but key grabs are still required for legacy windows.
Fixes T6148
@fix
thats just a little helper, where the logic to find and fetch the
provider is bound to the position in the widget tree, this means that
for example gengrid could change the way the logical parent is
evalulated. (For example to map the logical parent to a item)
Simply pass in the strbuf and don't expect the callee to own it. This
makes things simpler and safer (it'll crash only if the callee frees
said strbuf, and shouldn't leak). efl_ebug_name is new in the upcoming
release, EFL 1.21.
Realised this after talking with Amitesh. Thanks.
See 999dbd9764
And c4769ff898
I kept the safety error message for easier debugging.
Test scenario:
elementary_test -to "Window Inline"
Click on an entry. Press Shift+Tab.
Ping @bu5hm4n
the count ?: 1 check is pointless as count is already checked above.
make it clearer that it's > 0 and remove the ? check. silence for
coverity CID 1380542
Summary:
elm_bg was supposed to be used only in legacy,
but since we need a common object to be used as a background of widgets,
it is now renamed as efl_ui_bg and supports EO APIs.
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, woohyun
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5147
This moves the API entry points from Widget to Layout parts. I don't
think the other widgets support translation, but that is easy to fix.
The actual code implementation remains in elm_widget.c.
Legacy-only widgets are covered by Part_Legacy, while all EO widgets
that have text inherit from Layout (except Win but I don't think the
window title was translatable in legacy).
This removes 2/3 remaining part APIs from Widget.
Ref T5363
This will be used to replace the part translation API in Elm.Widget. It
should work for both parts and non-parts (ie. the main text of a button,
for instance).
For now I'm taking the following approach:
- All efl_text_set/get strings are untranslatable, i.e. get() returns
the visible string, set replaces and can not be translated.
- translatable_text_set/get needs to be used to enable automatic
translation, which in turns calls efl_text_set to modify the visible
string. Thus, translatable applications will have to use
efl_ui_translatable_text_set a lot more than efl_text_set, unless
they translate strings application-side.
Note that some other frameworks take a simpler approach equivalent to
calling efl_text_set() with an already translated text. This prevents
runtime language changes of the application, unless the application
handles them specifically.
pause event means that the window is not visible anymore to any user.
resume is triggered when the window became visible again or just
became visible again.
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
Carsten Haitzler
Derek Foreman
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Shinwoo Kim
Jean-Philippe Andre
Sungtaek Hong
YeongJong Lee
Amitesh Singh
Hosang Kim
Jaehyun Cho
Pawel Aksiutowicz
Lukasz Stanislawski
Shilpa Singh
Marcel Hollerbach