This leverage the new infrastructure from Eo that provide a scheduler for any event
attached to any object.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10481
Sometimes message is appended when message queue is walking.
In this case, newly added messages are not filtered.
So I add message pending queue for filtering message.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10459
we couldn't have multilpe listeners before. now we can. better this
way. have to do this now because i can't mark efl task as @beta
without taking out massive wads of efl with it.
this also defers parent exit until all children exit and will wait
around looping until those children do report back with exited status
etc. - this meay mean some hangs for badly written/blocking apps that
have efl thrrads that refuse to exit. a slight policy change also
means that by default thread objects also get auto-deleted whent hey
report back exit codes etc. which leads to less code if you don't care
about this.
We have to keep this as an API, but binding do not need to see it at this point.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9297
it appears that this could be emulated with other functions. Plus the
function had the limitation, that no constructors could be used.
ref T7597
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7985
strings often enough are generated e.g. via "%s/%s" or "%i" or similar
etc. ... i have poitned to examples, so move to make all strings
consistently stringshared, fix a bug added to the efl thread code
where it accessed and freed array even tho array was consumed (but not
strings) in the set, and the code used free to consume not
stringshare_del. fix other code and tests to match
EXCTLY the kind of bugs and mistakes with this kind of design that i
said would happen more often just happened...
Until this commit eo did class functions as part of the vtable, which
enabled those functions to be overwritten in classes inheriting another
class. However in task T7675 we decided that this is not really good for
bindings, as most OOP languages do not support this sort of feature.
After this commit eolian realizes class function completly outside of
the vtable, the c-symbol that is the class funciton is now just directly
redirecting to a implementation, without the involvement of the vtable.
This also means a change to the syntax created by eo:
Calling before:
class_function(CLASS_A);
Calling after:
class_function();
Implementation before:
class_function(const Eo *obj, void *pd) { ... }
Implementation after:
class_function(void) { ... }
This fixes T7675.
Co-authored-by: lauromauro <lauromoura@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7901
This reverts commit a57c7f7510.
I pretty much hate to just revert your revert, but you failed to read my
replies, and failed to understand what i was talking about.
And YES we talked at fosdem about the platform issue, and do you
remember my answer, that back in time this might be the case, today is
different freebsd suppoerts setenv, and for windows we have a setenv
implementation in evil. And yes, vtorri also created a issue how bad and
evil this commit is, however, i still fail to see the issue since setenv
unsetenv and clearenv usages are taken as needed. (T7693)
The ownership question is answered in
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7516#137367.
Can we please get into a state of technical discussions, and not *oh
shit, i am going to revert this* this has been in review for a long
time, a lots of people have tested it, we discussed things on it, and
there was 3 weeks of no reply from you.
The issues that exist will be dealed with. Feel free to create tasks if
you want :)
setenv and unsetenv are not portable. i explained to you at fosdem
there are issues and it's why i used putenv in the original
implementation and even though it's a pain (the string tou pass to
putenv is a pointer used literallt from there on in and you get it
from getenv, thus making ownership a pain -this is a libc issue we
can't readily solve). use putenv like the original code. then put it
back in. vtorri now has windows porting issues with the setenv use. i
knew there was a reason that still existed...
in addition your in_sync stuff is broken. psuedocode:
// assuming BLAGH env is not set to anything here
c = efl_core_env_get(global_env, "BLAH");
...
putenv("BLAH=10");
...
c = efl_core_env_Get(global_env, "BLAH");
i will get NULL in both cases for c ... but i should get "10" for the
2nd in reality. reality is lots of code across application code and
libraries will at times mess with the environment. it has to work with
this. the prior implementation did work with this.
Revert "ecore: here comes a env object"
This reverts commit 2373d5db5b.
Revert "efl_task: remove env from this object"
This reverts commit c3d69f66a6.
Revert "ecore: get rid of commands in efl_task."
This reverts commit 616381e9cf.
Revert "ecore: here comes a command line object"
This reverts commit 48e5684b3c.
1. this is broken:
EOLIAN static const char*
_efl_core_command_line_command_get(const Eo *obj EINA_UNUSED, Efl_Core_Command_Line_Data *pd)
{
return eina_strdup(pd->string_command);
}
it returns a const char * BUT it duplicates it on return. no. a big
fat honking NO. return a char * or don't duplicate. pick.
2. _efl_core_command_line_command_array_set() is broken by design. it
accepts an array of strings, but the strings are owned by the caller
who creates the array (requiring they free them up themselves after
this call) but the array becomes owned by the callee. the code here frees the
incoming array but doesn't care about the string content of it. it's
leak heaven waiting to happen (or bugs when someone wants to access
the array they create to walk it to free the strings they put into it
after it is set).
i brought this up and it was dismissed. now exactly he issue i brought
up is there with mixed ownership and the added complexity as well as
transfer of some ownership but not others.
go back and think about this so it isn't broken by design.
Note that the usage in efl_thread.c should and could be removed.
the problem with its usage is that when the ARGUMENTS event is fired,
noone ever had the chance to subscribe to the loop of the thread yet. So
all in all this is unneccessary, since noone could ever touch that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7517
This reverts commit 9b5155c9f1.
For now lets revert this, this breaks copy and paste, further more it
has the potential to break a lot more things, as eio_model tends to use
efl_loop_promise new, and then eina_promise_data_set, which is
explicitly forbidden.
This fixes crashing terminology instances.
I am not sure this is the right way to do it as binding would have to likely
to bind it manually.
Reviewed-by: Lauro Neto <Lauro Moura <lauromoura@expertisesolutions.com.br>>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7492
This brings in the possibility to receive the app object from bindings.
With the app object you can listen to pause / args / terminate / resume
events.
fix T7509
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7480
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
For numeric types, eina_value_set() accepts values instead of references
on the value to be set. Hence, we were affecting as the exit code of the
loop a garbage value, yielding to invalid results.
so there is something broken in the complect efl promise/loop promise
that the clear of promises on loop destroy is clearing
promises/futures that have already triggered (loop timer ones). i've
spent enough time figuring out that it is happening.
_efl_loop_timeout_del() simple doenst ensure the future in
pending_futures for that promise is removed from the list. getting the
future from the promise handle is an exercise in pain... so i'm not
continuing with that path and will just ignore it.
but for now filling the promise data with null at least means if the
menory is re-used after free it wont see garbage freed ptrs and get
nulls so its easier to track.
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
this is astart of the work for having a common task class/interface
between loops, threads ane exe's so the i/o is all symmetric and works
the same way between all of them as well as similarly for launching
and knowing when the exit etc. etc.
this is not final and not perfect, but it's a start. comments of
course welcome
add efl_main_loop_steal() and efl_main_loop_release() for new efl
namespace versiosn of ecore_thread_main_loop_begin() and
ecore_thread_main_loop_end().
Cedric Bail
Hosang Kim
Carsten Haitzler
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Daniel Kolesa
Jean Guyomarc'h
Mike Blumenkrantz