Summary:
those types are now used in stable API, we should mark it stable.
ref T7584
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, q66, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8274
Summary:
these are all types that we do not currently want to release
Depends on D8102
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8241
Summary:
these hints are not strictly size-related, so renaming them is more consistent
with their actual function
ref T7563
Depends on D7968
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7563
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7977
It's a complex struct but defined in EO as a simple struct. ABI-wise
it's equivalent to Eina_Rectangle. Some macros that use Eina_Rectangle
also work on Eina_Rect out of the box, most of the code dealing with
x,y,w,h will require no modifications either.
But Eina_Rect provides direct access to a size or position 2d component,
as well as the usual x,y,w,h. The field "rect" is provided as a
convenience for code dealing with both Eina_Rectangle and Eina_Rect. We
may or may not require it.
Note: Size2D could use unsigned values but I have spotted a few places
in the code that actually use -1 to indicate invalid size (as opposed to
0x0).
@feature
This size hint is only used by naviframe, which is not part of
our EO widgets. I also believe it might be an even more confusing
hint than the others.
I kept the typedef as is in Evas_Legacy.h in case an app is
written using EFL_GFX_ instead of EVAS_...
Most of the values were the same, with edje having just a couple
more error codes.
Not entirely sure the prefix Efl.Image is correct for this type.
Maybe just Efl.Load.Error?
So far this was protected behind ifdef EO_API_SUPPORT. It also
was not used internally. Dropping this before the release, since
we will soon have a (hopefully) better solution to handle various
color representations.
Problem:
- edje aspect ratio is defined by 1 enum and 2 double (min, max)
- window aspect ratio is defined by only 1 double
- evas object aspect ratio is defined by 1 enum and 2 ints (w, h)
Which one is the best interface? Are min/max a better option?
Also, not sure how to call the enum...
Summary: let me know whats your thought
Reviewers: Hermet, cedric
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3893
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Added flip and orientation interface and used them in evas_image.
Removed efl_image_orientation_set API and used efl_orientation_set and efl_flip_set API.
In implementation part, converted enums back and forth in order to keep current implementation as it is.
Test Plan: src/examples/evas/evas-images5.c
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, raster, tasn, herdsman, woohyun, cedric, felipealmeida, jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3844
A small hack to the toolchain allows us to generate enums with eolian
for use by Eet and Emile (internal or otherwise non-eo libraries).
Thanks to how BUILT_SOURCES works, the eo.h files required by Emile
will be generated before they are used.
This adds a partial dependency on eo for eet and emile:
- package dependency
- include dependency
There is no library link dependency.
Marcel Hollerbach
Mike Blumenkrantz
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Jean-Philippe Andre
Andy Williams
Stefan Schmidt
Jee-Yong Um
Cedric BAIL
Subhransu Mohanty
Tom Hacohen
Yeshwanth Reddivari