Many people try "make check" and then complain they have some error
messages, but they are actually expected... but even for the
experienced is hard to know whenever it was expected or not, so
explicitly say that.
Also check if safety checks are enabled or not before doing "break"
tests, otherwise we'll end with segfaults and tests failing. (I have
not tested with them disabled, but should be okay).
SVN revision: 42360
Being able to indivually initialize individual modules was initially
"good", but at end it's putting complexities on users that would try
to "optimize" by doing just what they used, but in the end most people
would get them wrong, users would have to do lots of code and etc. At
the end it does not worth.
Most module init just register handful errors and log domains, so are
cheap. The exception is mempool users, that would dlopen() stuff, but
people that are concerned (embedded) can just compile those statically
in eina.
Since at the end any real application would use most of modules, we
actually end saving lots of function calls that would do nothing other
than increment a global counter.
I also did the init/shutdown use an array, making it easier to
maintain. The inital dependencies were analysed by a script I wrote, I
hope it's all right.
Please fix any breakages you find!
SVN revision: 42300
what is modified:
eina_counter_add -> eina_counter_new
eina_counter_delete -> eina_counter_free
eina_lalloc_delete -> eina_lalloc_free
eina_mempool_new -> eina_mempool_add
eina_mempool_delete -> eina_mempool_del
eina_mempool_alloc -> eina_mempool_malloc
eina_tiler_del -> eina_tiler_free
It remains some questions: have the following API a good name:
eina_module_list_delete
eina_list_free
eina_rbtree_delete
(see ticket #286)
If you find any problem, please report in that thread
SVN revision: 41187
Carsten Haitzler
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Vincent Torri
Cedric BAIL