Those APIs can then be used by Elm.Layout, hopefully
simplifying the API.
I wonder if the APIs should be prefixed "calc_" (as is)
or "layout_calc_". The extra "layout_" prefix would make
it common with other layout APIs (eg. signals, data,
size min/max, ...).
Ref T5315
This is really only a demonstration of what kind of information
we can print with efl_debug_name_get(). Hopefully this can help
debugging with printf/ERR logs and even help with live debugging
inside gdb.
This shouldn't be used for other purposes than debugging, as the
exact string format is not defined.
@feature
Most of the values were the same, with edje having just a couple
more error codes.
Not entirely sure the prefix Efl.Image is correct for this type.
Maybe just Efl.Load.Error?
After a long search I found that fileselector was not calling
super.group_del on deletion, leading to the use of dangling pointers.
So let's verify that group_del is properly called.
See T4598
if its a file downloading (to a tmp location) or a zip/tar/whatever
file being extracted also to a tmp location and that tmp file needs to
be removed after ...you need to keep the obj around to know when to
delete the file. this makes the keeping optional and you query if the
vpath obj is meant to be kept or not. if it's not it's safe to del
immediately.
this cuts down 1 obj per image obj/edje obj when generally unused.
save some mem.
Lacking a proper internal tag, I'm using both protected (it is
in fact a protected access function) and beta (to mark as unstable,
not real API).
New smart objects based on EO only should rely on constructor,
finalize and destructor exclusively. In theory, this should be fine.
Unfortunately it may be impossible to inherit from the Efl.Ui.Win
class as it uses a really bad hack and calls super.constructor
inside the finalize method.
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
These should be just overrides of Efl.Gfx.visible.set. Many
widgets were handling smart show() and hide() manually, which
means this patch is quite large.
Hopefully this doesn't break anything, obviously. But here are
some widgets known to be problematic, as the old code flow was
really strange (sometimes not calling the efl_super function):
- window
- notify
Most of the smart functions "Efl.Canvas.Group.group_xxx" should
not exist and be overrides of the base object function instead.
Cleaning this up is necessary if we want an EO API for custom
smart objects. This patch is the first attempt at removing a
method (the simplest one).
As for no_render, I wonder if propagating to the children
really is necessary. evas_render should skip them already.
edje was keeping every edje object created in an eina list so it could
access them later. not really great when every list node contains at
least 4 pointers (data, next, prev and accounting, possibly magic
too). also ever time an edje object is deleted it has to remove from
this list which means... walking the list to where the obj is... not
great. replace with an inlist which is just 3 ptrs, no extra pressure
on list pool and removal os O(1) too.
@optimize
This removes some useless code in various places, where the
switch from eo_do() to standard function call was not properly
refactored.
This changes:
type ret = 0;
ret = my_eo_function();
return ret;
To:
return my_eo_function();
this saves about another 80Kb or so in dirty pages by only loading
ephysics when needed. This removed ephysics and bullet library dirty
pages from the process space. this is another patch to address T4227.
@fix
this should cut some memory used by edje by using smaller types like
shorts instead of ints where we just dont need a full int range and
short will do, and re-ordering in memory data soit packs better when
accoutning for alignment
This is legacy stuff. I wish we could hide it from our inheritance
entirely. Instead, just make it abstract, remove all functions from
eo (doable here) and rename with the keyword "internal" in the new
ugly java style name.
This reverts commit 546ff7bbba.
It seems that eo_del() is useful and removing it was creating bugs.
The issue is that the way we defined parents in eo, both the parent and
the programmer share a reference to the object. When we eo_unref() that
reference as the programmer, eo has no way to know it's this specific
reference we are freeing, and not a general one, so in some
circumstances, for example:
eo_ref(child);
eo_unref(child); // trying to delete here
eo_unref(container); // container is deleted here
eo_unref(child); // child already has 0 refs before this point.
We would have an issue with references and objects being freed too soon
and in general, issue with the references.
Having eo_del() solves that, because this one explicitly unparents if
there is a parent, meaning the reference ownership is explicitly taken
by the programmer.
eo_del() is essentially a convenience function around "check if has
parent, and if so unparent, otherwise, unref". Which should be used when
you want to delete an object although it has a parent, and is equivalent
to eo_unref() when it doesn't have one.
We used to have eo_del() as the mirrored action to eo_add(). No longer,
now you just always eo_unref() to delete an object. This change makes it
so the reference of the parent is shared with the reference the
programmer has. So eo_parent_set(obj, NULL) can free an object, and so
does eo_unref() (even if there is a parent).
This means Eo no longer complains if you have a parent during deletion.
Setting the no-render flag on an elm widget had no effect,
as it was not properly propagated to its children. This should
fix that, but I'm not a fan of the solution.
Fixes T3371
Summary:
Edje data structure is passed as a parameter, but in file.set method
_edje_fetch() is called one more time unnecessarily.
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3788
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Mostly unused vars following the removal of eo_do_ret().
However, there are some cases where the migration script got some things
wrong, and I had to manually fix them.
I just ran my script (email to follow) to migrate all of the EFL
automatically. This commit is *only* the automatic conversion, so it can
be easily reverted and re-run.
This is necessary for backward compatibility still I am thinking of displaying a warning for this
use case and request people to update there work and drop that feature in the future (In a year
maybe from now). Elementary doesn't need this as it depends on Ecore_Evas.
Edje_Part can change its min or max size in code level with
size_class.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3329
PS: Manual commit, arc refused to work...
@feature
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.andre@samsung.com>
Summary:
It adds evas_object_paragraph_direction_set, get APIs.
The APIs set or get paragraph direction to/from the given object.
It changes BiDi calculations and affect the direction and aligning of text.
It doesn't have any effect to text without Fribidi library.
The default paragraph direction is EVAS_BIDI_DIRECTION_INHERIT.
If dir is EVAS_BIDI_DIRECTION_INHERIT, paragraph direction is changed
according to smart parent object. If there is no smart parent object,
paragraph direction works as EVAS_BIDI_DIRECTION_NEUTRAL.
@feature
Test Plan:
Test cases included to the following files.
- evas_test_textblock.c
- evas_test_text.c
- evas_test_object_smart.c
Run "make check".
Reviewers: woohyun, raster, herdsman, tasn
Subscribers: c, raster, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D1690
From now on, constructors should return a value, usually the object
being worked on, or NULL (if the constructor failed). This can also
be used for implementing singletons, by just always returning the same
object from the constructor.
This is one of the final steps towards stabilizing Eo.
@feature
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Daniel Kolesa
Carsten Haitzler
Jee-Yong Um
Tom Hacohen
Jee-Yong Um
Cedric BAIL
Youngbok Shin
Mike Blumenkrantz