Summary:
Instead of including the legacy header on the main header, just include
it where it is actually used (diff_widget.c), like in elm_code_widget.c.
Test Plan: Try to compile edi with the tarball from `make dist`. It should not fail with elm_code related errors.
Reviewers: raster, stefan_schmidt, felipealmeida
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5807
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
It has been discussed on the ML (thread: "[RFC] rename efl_self") and
IRC, and has been decided we should rename it to this in order to avoid
confusion with the already established meaning of self which is very
similar to what we were using it for, but didn't have complete overlap.
Kudos to Marcel Hollerbach for initiating the discussion and
fighting for it until he convinced a significant mass. :)
This commit breaks API, and depending on compiler potentially ABI.
@feature
Lauro Moura
Sungtaek Hong
Tom Hacohen
Cedric BAIL