If we are to choose Efl.Ui.I18n for the internationalization support, the localization API
should be named accordingly L10n.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7507
Summary:
A call to efl_data_Scope_get is actually quite dangerous,
efl_data_scope_get will return a pointer to a 0 sized segment in memory,
this is happening based on how the class data is organized. So in theory
you could use this pointer and accidently write to it. This resolves
this issue.
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6337
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
legacy part do not have MY_CLASS. if ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL is used for
legacy part, it call efl_super(non-legacy class).
we need super of TYPE _CLASS instead of MY_CLASS.
Test Plan:
WITH D5818
1. elementary_test -to progressbar
2. check that efl_part is working in _progressbar_part_value_set
Reviewers: cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5819
Summary:
efl_part macros are using each widget's internally defined
default_part_get() functions to get default part name.
This might potentially cause errors when future widgets
inherits the widget but not overriding Efl.Text.text and
Efl.Content.content.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5797
Summary:
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL replaces ELM_PART_OVERRIDE and
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_ONLY_ALIASES.
The difference is ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL calls super
ELM_PART_IMPLEMENT when subclass of part is not needed.
Test Plan:
Run elementary_test, Part Background, background part is well set.
Run efl.ui.panes/efl.ui.flip, check content is well set.
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5566
This API is meant to be used by parts only, and by bindings dealing with
part objects. This patch fixes make check which got broken in the after
the previous one (cxx).
This simplifies the IMPLEMENT macro, which can now be a proper function.
Also, do not set a parent for the part object, as it's not useful and
could mess up the refcount.
See previous commit :)
Note: right now the background part has a small 3d indent which comes
from the legacy theme being used. This will be fixed soon.
When I first implemented the Efl.Container interface I made a mistake of
mixing "single slot" content API's with "multiple children" content
API's. This should fix that, by separating API's that are for a single
part and those that deal with a list of children.
Efl.Content: Single slot. This will be used a lot by efl_part()
objects, and for the default content of widgets (eg. the window
content).
Efl.Container: Multiple children. Used by lists, boxes, layouts
(edje/elm), etc...
I didn't see any class that implemented both interfaces (note: Layout
implements Container and Button implements Content, so technically
Button implements both through inheritance).
For now the eo_prefix is not changed in Efl.Container. I wonder if it
should be reset (to efl_container) or not. This would only affect the C
API.
Ref T5328
Also implement markup_set/get for:
- Efl.Ui.Frame
- Efl.Ui.Slider
Users may choose between text_set/get and markup_set/get, depending on
whether they want to escape their text or not.
This is VERY tricky.
For legacy, just create an internal class that has both. It's easier
this way. For parts that are handled by Layout directly, we know from
Edje which type to return.
For EO objects we should know from the part name which kind of part we
are dealing with:
- text (overridden by the widget)
- content (overridden by the widget)
- special (new efl_part based functions)
- generic (handled by Layout)
Note: Efl.Ui.Slider was handling "span size" on ALL parts. That's bad...
This is now limited to "span" only.
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
In Edje and Elementary, we have part objects, which are what is returned
by the interface efl_part(). Those objects can't be of an opaque type as
this doesn't work nicely with strongly typed languages such as C++ or
C#. In JS, Lua, C the types are weak and mostly runtime-based so it
doesn't matter much.
As a consequence, the documentation and the types need to look nice in
this EO API. Thus, we remove the abusive term "internal" and explicitly
call all those classes "part" something.
Eventually we want the types to be declared in the EO file so bindings
(C#, C++, ...) can generate the proper access methods, returning the
best possible types.
Note that right now a few of those part types are used in the legacy API
but don't actually need to be exposed externally.
This is kind of a mega commit that does all the renaming at once, but
it's really just a big sed operation. The power of good IDEs :)
Ref T5315
Ref T5306
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
This makes layout parts implement Efl.Ui.Cursor.
This also adds the missing bool returns from that interface.
This removes 7 APIs from Elm.Layout.
Ref T5315
This in theory should only affect the EO API usage. In EO
we don't want efl_part() to be used for NULL part. In other
words, there is no "default" part in EO objects. Instead, those
functions like text_set or content_set should simply be
implemented by the object themselves.
The legacy API on the other hand will make sure that the
"part" argument is set to a non-NULL value before reaching
this point.
This is a follow-up to a4b79fdbe1.
efl_part no longer supports NULL parts.
NULL text parts are now aliased in legacy code beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.andre@samsung.com>
This affects the legacy content_set/get/unset part APIs. This
should avoid some unwanted ERR messages in case an elm_object_
API is used on an elm widget that doesn't implement said API.
What this does is request the widget for the name of the default
part if NULL was passed in. Since some widgets are not elm_layout,
they have to override the API themselves, which is why I made it
an internal EO API (rather than a series of efl_isa()).
In theory, part should never be NULL when reaching the internal
implementation code in the widgets, at least for content.
In EO, efl_part(obj, NULL) should be invalid.
Ref T5629
The expected usage is efl_text_set(efl_part(layout, part), text);
Same for text_get.
Also, added an example how to make API easier with providing
efl_text_set/get for the widget itself, in efl_ui_button. Please see
this example.
This code was written when eo_del() was removed and eo_unref() was the
recommended practice. Since we added eo_del() back we now need to adjust
this new code accordingly.
So, I was storing a single "sd" pointer (class private data)
but using it in two different places, ie. as if it were two
different classes. Crashes happened, complaints were heard.
See T3714.
This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used.
This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs
(get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead.
This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should
have been changed. Fingers crossed.
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Cedric BAIL
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
YeongJong Lee
Sungtaek Hong
Jaehyun Cho
Amitesh Singh
Jean-Philippe Andre
Daniel Hirt
Tom Hacohen