This makes it possible to very easily create drop shadows and glow
effects on any widget. This is absolutely not optimized, though the main
performance bottleneck is that the proxy images get redrawn after just
moving.
@feature
This region has little to do with focus, as it's more of a region of
interest within the widget, and not directly related to the highlight
geometry, for instance. It's related to focus in the sense that only
widgets with focus would really care about this region.
I decided to change this name after talking with @bu5hm4n.
Note that gengrid uses this but is also completely broken (the focus
highlight floats around and you don't even see the focused item).
Note: This is very close to show_region but I'm not sure those can be
merged safely (since the default "focus_region" is NULL while the
default "show_region" is the widget's geometry).
Ref T5363
This removes the last remaining legacy-style part API from Widget.
I think this is redundant with the property "translatable_text"
introduced in Efl.Ui.Translatable.
Ref T5363
This moves the API entry points from Widget to Layout parts. I don't
think the other widgets support translation, but that is easy to fix.
The actual code implementation remains in elm_widget.c.
Legacy-only widgets are covered by Part_Legacy, while all EO widgets
that have text inherit from Layout (except Win but I don't think the
window title was translatable in legacy).
This removes 2/3 remaining part APIs from Widget.
Ref T5363
This will be used to replace the part translation API in Elm.Widget. It
should work for both parts and non-parts (ie. the main text of a button,
for instance).
For now I'm taking the following approach:
- All efl_text_set/get strings are untranslatable, i.e. get() returns
the visible string, set replaces and can not be translated.
- translatable_text_set/get needs to be used to enable automatic
translation, which in turns calls efl_text_set to modify the visible
string. Thus, translatable applications will have to use
efl_ui_translatable_text_set a lot more than efl_text_set, unless
they translate strings application-side.
Note that some other frameworks take a simpler approach equivalent to
calling efl_text_set() with an already translated text. This prevents
runtime language changes of the application, unless the application
handles them specifically.
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
It's a complex struct but defined in EO as a simple struct. ABI-wise
it's equivalent to Eina_Rectangle. Some macros that use Eina_Rectangle
also work on Eina_Rect out of the box, most of the code dealing with
x,y,w,h will require no modifications either.
But Eina_Rect provides direct access to a size or position 2d component,
as well as the usual x,y,w,h. The field "rect" is provided as a
convenience for code dealing with both Eina_Rectangle and Eina_Rect. We
may or may not require it.
Note: Size2D could use unsigned values but I have spotted a few places
in the code that actually use -1 to indicate invalid size (as opposed to
0x0).
@feature
We had here a little problem, state focus_state_eval function handled
the unregisteration and consideration of the focus flags and then only
called a helper function (which was a widget function), that then did
the registeration in logical or regular mode.
Elm scroller for example took that function overwrote it and did onyl
permit logical registrations. Then again a evaluation of the focus state
and flags took place, and the function considered elm_scroller should be
registered as regular object, but found it to be logical. This lead to
the problem that we permantently unregistered Elm.Scroller and
registered it again as logical just to unregister it again. This was on
the one side a performance downside. But also a bug since all items from
within the Elm_Scrollers sub manager are getting reparent onto the
parent, which means not the root of the scroller (the scroller itself)
is the logical entrypoint to the widget but rather this reparented
widget, which led to unexpected focus warps like described in T5923.
tldr: this fixes T5923
See the previous commits. All focus_highlight APIs are defined in the
Widget class but only implemented at the Window level. For consistency I
believe this call should also be forwarded to the window. The previous
logic had absolutely no effect at all, except storing a stringshare.
The day focus_highlight becomes widget-specific (i.e. each widget has
its own highlight style) then this can be changed.
Note: This will apply to legacy API as well.
Ref T5363
Note: elm_test "Focus Style" can be used to test this API. The test case
is a bit broken (overly complex EDC?) but if you're patient you can see
the difference between "glow" and "glow_effect".
Ref T5363
Ref T5322
This removes the special code in the legacy API for
elm_widget_focus_mouse_up_handle. Add an internal helper to find the
first widget parent. And mark as protected.
Apparently this functions is still required for the new focus manager.
Ref T5363
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
This is a protected function. It doesn't need to return anything, as all
implementation just returned true, always. Also, the legacy API was just
a wrapper doing nothing special (except verify that we have a widget,
which the recursive code already does).
Tested with fr_FR :)
Ref T5363
It should be implemented as a efl_part() API.
For now I've only done a quick hack, as the only overrides were:
- notify: already a Part implementation. Also it turns out the default
theme does not even have any text part in the notify group.
- combobox: not a Part implementation, but also very badly defined wrt.
parts in general. efl_part() is handled by the parent class (button)
which makes it tricky to override just for one function.
With this patch I'm trying to keep the same behaviour as earlier (where
efl_part() is used for layouts and there is a special path for
combobox).
Ref T5363
I believe all of those APIs are in fact meant for widgets to use
themselves:
- on_focus
- on_show_region_hook
- focus_region
- focus_register
- focus_manager_factory
Ref T5363
I was told that the scrollable interface is being redesigned for EO.
This API definitely does not belong to the base Widget class, as it's
quite specific to item-based scrollable widgets, such as lists and
grids. Since Elm.Interface_Scrollable is itself being revamped, it is a
good place to move that EO API for now.
Ref T5363
1. Uniformize the API, which is now for internal use:
This uses the same enum as scroller "movement_block" instead
of 2 separate properties. Less APIs, more consistence.
2. Remove scroll_lock x/y from EO widget. I was told it is not going to
exist in the upcoming scrollable interface.
3. Remove scroll hold/freeze getters.
scroll hold/freeze push/pop are still there but it remains to be seen
how the EO scrollable interface will exploit them. Right now they are
full of bugs.
Ref T5363
This also includes the drag_child_lock APIs. This had nothing to do with
dragging beyond maybe the case where scrolling is done by thumbscroll
(ie. finger drag).
Note that the EAPI were called already scroll_lock, not drag_lock.
Ref T5363
Amitesh Singh
Jean-Philippe Andre
Andy Williams
Sungtaek Hong
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Kolesa
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Stefan Schmidt