class: elm_layout.
This will be, besides the codebase for the elm_layout widget, a common
base for all other widgets which got an edje layout as a basis for
their decoration.
From now on, all elm_layout_* namespaced fuctions will function
on objects inheriting from this base:
- elm_layout_content_set
- elm_layout_content_get
- elm_layout_content_unset
- elm_layout_text_set
- elm_layout_text_get
(recovered from deprecated header -> not anymore)
- elm_layout_sizing_eval
- elm_layout_data_get
- elm_layout_edje_get
- elm_layout_file_set
- elm_layout_theme_set
- elm_layout_box_append
- elm_layout_box_prepend
- elm_layout_box_insert_before
- elm_layout_box_insert_at
- elm_layout_box_remove
- elm_layout_box_remove_all
- elm_layout_table_pack
- elm_layout_table_unpack
- elm_layout_table_clear
Three missing functions on layouts were added, then:
- elm_layout_signal_emit
- elm_layout_signal_callback_add
- elm_layout_signal_callback_del
Naturally, the elm_object_ namespaced counterparts of those will also
function (they will be deprecated on the future).
SVN revision: 70708
This is for general purpose containers in Elm, those supporting
- elm_object_part_content_set()
- elm_object_part_content_get()
- elm_object_part_content_unset()
SVN revision: 70707
resize objects to new schema.
sub-object-{add,del} new class functions got their bodies in. One by
one, the old elm_widget_ namespaced calls to them got to be migrated
to the class calls.
A resize object is now a sub-object, too. This should be like that
from the start -- we share code and avoid callback duplication -- what
leaded to a plethora of bugs.
SVN revision: 70705
properly by real widgets.
I'm also creating a *compatibility* class on top of it, which extends
the old (unique) one to its old components, so that everything goes
unnoticed for the widgets.
Next, we'll be accessing class functions for widget hooks *on the base
class*, which will be proxied back to the instance ones.
Then, one by one the widgets will be translated to a proper
hierarchical smart class parentage, making extensibility and reuse
much better.
Last, but not least, since we'll be moving these hooks to the class,
where (almost) everything is a function, let's adapt to the future --
take away the "_func" suffix from them.
NB: there is ONE hook and associated data which was kept on the base,
for now: "show_region" stuff. I did that because scrollers need that
in order to work, right now. Keep in mind, though, the scrollers will
be reworked, so that fields ought to be changed soon, too.
SVN revision: 70704
in naviframe. Patch by Shilpa Onkar Singh <shilpa.singh@samsung.com>
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:30 PM, SHILPA ONKAR SINGH
<shilpa.singh@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please find attached, patch for elc_naviframe bug fix: "wrong signal
sent when subtitle,title is set".
>
> Change Description:
> Bug Fix: Wrong signal sent when title/subtitle is set in naviframe.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Shilpa Singh
SVN revision: 70685
using elm_widget_focus_direction_go function, focus will be moved from
the current focused object to the near object in one direction.
Direction can be set by degree(for easy usability). Degree changes
clockwise, i.e. 0 means UP, 90 means RIGHT, 180 means DOWN, and 270
means LEFT. You can select any direction by changing this degree.
SVN revision: 70681
widget hierarchy.
Win inherits directly from Elm_Widget_Smart_Class, while inwin is now
an elm layout.
Note that elm_widget_sub_object_list_get(), which was an unecessary
hack only used on win, was killed.
SVN revision: 70640
class: elm_layout.
This will be, besides the codebase for the elm_layout widget, a common
base for all other widgets which got an edje layout as a basis for
their decoration.
From now on, all elm_layout_* namespaced fuctions will function
on objects inheriting from this base:
- elm_layout_content_set
- elm_layout_content_get
- elm_layout_content_unset
- elm_layout_text_set
- elm_layout_text_get
(recovered from deprecated header -> not anymore)
- elm_layout_sizing_eval
- elm_layout_data_get
- elm_layout_edje_get
- elm_layout_file_set
- elm_layout_theme_set
- elm_layout_box_append
- elm_layout_box_prepend
- elm_layout_box_insert_before
- elm_layout_box_insert_at
- elm_layout_box_remove
- elm_layout_box_remove_all
- elm_layout_table_pack
- elm_layout_table_unpack
- elm_layout_table_clear
Three missing functions on layouts were added, then:
- elm_layout_signal_emit
- elm_layout_signal_callback_add
- elm_layout_signal_callback_del
Naturally, the elm_object_ namespaced counterparts of those will also
function (they will be deprecated on the future).
SVN revision: 70631
This is for general purpose containers in Elm, those supporting
- elm_object_part_content_set()
- elm_object_part_content_get()
- elm_object_part_content_unset()
SVN revision: 70630
resize objects to new schema.
sub-object-{add,del} new class functions got their bodies in. One by
one, the old elm_widget_ namespaced calls to them got to be migrated
to the class calls.
A resize object is now a sub-object, too. This should be like that
from the start -- we share code and avoid callback duplication -- what
leaded to a plethora of bugs.
SVN revision: 70628
properly by real widgets.
I'm also creating a *compatibility* class on top of it, which extends
the old (unique) one to its old components, so that everything goes
unnoticed for the widgets.
Next, we'll be accessing class functions for widget hooks *on the base
class*, which will be proxied back to the instance ones.
Then, one by one the widgets will be translated to a proper
hierarchical smart class parentage, making extensibility and reuse
much better.
Last, but not least, since we'll be moving these hooks to the class,
where (almost) everything is a function, let's adapt to the future --
take away the "_func" suffix from them.
NB: there is ONE hook and associated data which was kept on the base,
for now: "show_region" stuff. I did that because scrollers need that
in order to work, right now. Keep in mind, though, the scrollers will
be reworked, so that fields ought to be changed soon, too.
SVN revision: 70627
Warnings resolved:
argument <name> of command @param is not found in the argument list of <function>
The following parameters of <function> are not documented.
Files modified:
elm_calendar.h
elm_map.h
Patch by: Thiago Thamada <tiba@profusion.mobi>
SVN revision: 70526
<hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After introduced flipped mode to genlist, some clearing process is
> added to _elm_genlist_item_unrealize.
> In item _elm_genlist_item_unrealize, item is casting to gengrid item
> or genlist item.
> segfault is occurred in _elm_genlist_item_unrealize at using gengrid.
> this patch moves flipped mode clearing process to _item_realize_cb.
>
> Thanks.
>
SVN revision: 70355
Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> After discuss with seoz, i changed to not clean selections also i
> removed the new added internal func.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I made a small patch to fix remained selection bug.
>> In decorate all mode, some item selection is not cleared after unset
>> decorate all mode.
>> I added to fix it.
>> And make unselecting common routine to a internal function.
>>
>> Thanks.
SVN revision: 70354
Subject: [E-devel] [patch] elm_genlist - bugfix at item flipped
I made a small patch about item flipped.
It resolves two bugs
1. flip_set and unset is called quickly, sometimes genlist can't free
flipped data.
it fixed to remove checking flipped status in item unrealize
2. add item unhighlight at flip_job
SVN revision: 70306
Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][Genlist] fix the bug in _elm_genlist_item_del_notserious
I made a patch to fix the bug in _elm_genlist_item_del_notserious.
If relcount is not 0 or walking is not 0, return.
SVN revision: 70291
Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][elementary_test] test_list
I had added test code for the elementary. but I made a pause it
because of
some reasons and just started again.
Today I have attached a patch for the elm_list which does not have test
code for the API elm_list_item_prev();
Please review the attached patch and give any feedbacks. I'll be back
with
other patches. Thanks!
SVN revision: 70265
Change Description: [elm_datetime.c] Separator parsing logic is changed in Datetime widget.
Predefined set of characters (both global and field specific) are ignored as field separators.
Can some one, please review and check-in the code in SVN Elementary.
Thanks, Sumanth
Singed-Off-By: Sumanth Krishna Mannam<sumanth.m@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 70220
verification. Patch by Taehwan Kim <ohpowel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bluezery <ohpowel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, elm_widget_sub_object_add() does not check if obj and sobj
> are same object.
> Actually it is a user problem if user add object itself as it's sub
object.
> But I think that this checking is needed and it is better to give
> error logs to users. Because it causes infinite loop and it is hart
> to debugging. :(
>
> Thanks.
SVN revision: 69995
Author : cnook kimcinoo@gmail.com
The evas_object_hide(popup) could not hide the popup.
So, I added callback to hide the popup, with the test
code.
SVN revision: 69960
text in "elm.text". This is because wd->text is updated by edje's
signal callback. I'll think more about removing all codes wd->text.
With my opinion they are useless.
SVN revision: 69948
Current Issue:
Focus does not go to Popup content and action area.
Reason:
focus_next hook is returning EINA_FALSE in focus_next_hook.
Change Description:
1. Routed the focus_next call to the internal notify object.
2. Set the visibility of action area layout in edc to True as the
visibility of the action area layout returns zero even if due to state
change it is set to visible state in edje.
3. Deleted the show event callback "_popup_show" in del_pre_ hook.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r>@samsumg.com>
SVN revision: 69947
Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I made a patch for elm_genlist_fields_update to selective content
update.
> a genlist item can update any content regardless of its mode.
>
> Thanks.
>
> PS: It assumed my previous patch is applied ([patch] elm_genlist -
> split flip content from item's content)
SVN revision: 69944
Current Issue:
Currently when we add a widget to window as a sub-object, e.g.
elm_notify_add(win) which internally calls elm_widget_sub_object_add
then the focus chain using <TAB> includes only
the first focusable subitem of the widget, not all.
Whereas with elm_win_resize_object_add, it works fine and cycles to
all focusable sub-items of the widget.
Reason:
The reason is that we are appending sub-object to the list in
elm_win which is used for focus chain, only in case of
elm_win_resize_object_add.
Change Description:
Added a new API: EAPI Eina_List
*elm_widget_sub_object_list_get(const Evas_Object *obj);
This API returns the list of sub-objects of an elementary widget
(sd->subobjs) where sd is Smart_Data pointer obtainted using
elm_widget_smart_data_get(obj).
We have used this API in elm_win for focus_next_hook implementation.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r>@samsumg.com>
SVN revision: 69943
When pasting data to entry, notify_handler_text sent incorrect string.
Because notify_handler_text received string including garbage value.
I cut string as its data length.
Signed-By-Off: Minseok Kim <minseok3.kim@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 69942
Dear ALL,
If the block that must be removed/freed, it has already removed/freed in
_item_block_del.
So I removed the code in _clear_cb.
Thanks
Joey
Submitted-By-Off ChankWook Jung<jchanwook@gmail.com>
SVN revision: 69929
Revert "elm bin: Use convenient utility function elm_win_util_standard_add() instead of elm_win_add() + elm_bg_add(). This is for normal style (ELM_WIN_BASIC) window."
This reverts commit 31b24a0edb0028528d7c859070e03236ba42867b.
SVN revision: 69847
Change Description:
- Year min/max values are moved to elm_config.
- Format specifier must come along with % followed by any separator. ( % 123d is not supported but %d will denote Date format specifier)
- Field separator can constitute multiple spaces, Space followed by any other non format specifier is also treated as the separator till its max length. ( %d x/ %b #2 format displays 27 x/ Mar #2 )
Thanks, Sumanth
Submitted-By-Off Sumanth Krishna Mannam<sumanth.m@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 69846
Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I talked with seoz. and agreed with previous naming changing is
insufficient.
>
> so changed like this
> "mode_" -> "deco_it_"
> "edit_" -> "deco_all_"
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained.
>> I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
>>
>> "edit_" -> "deco_"
>> and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
>>
>> Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
SVN revision: 69836
for this change.
Revert "After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained."
This reverts commit 5e1aa3c8b0382a0ca471150f4c219cd32dbdbe22.
SVN revision: 69835
I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
"edit_" -> "deco_" and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
SVN revision: 69793
Subject: [E-devel] [patch][elementary] elc_popup, restack issue
The elc_popup does not raise to the top of its layer even though
evas_object_raise() is called with the popup object.
Because the elm_widget_resize_object_set(); makes notify object which is
internally used in the popup have a smart parent.
Ultimately, the callback function for EVAS_CALLBACK_RESTACK of the
notify
is not called.
So I removed elm_widget_resize_object_set(); from the popup and added
some
implementations to show the popup properly.
Moreover, I have added test code also in the attached patch. Then,
please
review the patch and give any feedbacks. Thanks.
SVN revision: 69790
1. delete old content object
2. check whether new content object is same as old content object
3. rename internal content set hook function
4. elm_widget_sub_object_del will be followed by evas_object_del
5. added some doxygen description.
SVN revision: 69738
<hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I made a patch about flip_realize.
> Currently flip feature uses content_objs, so it should keep its
content_objs.
> However it's lost at _item_flips_realize().
> So i fixed to initialize with its content_objs.
>
> Thanks
SVN revision: 69725
Attached to the mail is a patch for elm_panes.
I have a query that shall we hide the unset content in the widget itself or should application explicitly hide them after unsetting!
In case of edje_object_part_unswallow, application needs to do it explicitly and it is documented but in case of elm_object_part_content_unset, there is no documentation available.
Details of the patch:
Existing Issue before this change:
1. Panes deletes the older content while setting a new content even though both are same.
2. left and right content are being unswallowed in the content_left_set and _content_right_unset functions. So when the reparenting happens, say when the content is put inside a layout then only _sub_del gets called and
unswallowing does not happen as these functions do not get called.
e.g. @@ -253,8 +250,6 @@ _content_left_unset(Evas_Object *obj)
if (!wd->contents.left) return NULL;
Evas_Object *content = wd->contents.left;
elm_widget_sub_object_del(obj, content); //wd->contents.left already gets set to NULL in _sub_del
- edje_object_part_unswallow(wd->panes, content); // can be unswallowed in _sub_del as in case of reparenting like setting content in a layout, only _sub_del will get called, not this function
- wd->contents.left = NULL; //this instruction is redundent as it happens in _sub_del anyway
return content;
}
Change Description:
1. Unswallowing the contents now in _sub_del as this is a common function to be executed when subobject removal happens.
2. Comparing the current content with new before deleting.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r@samsumg.com>
Thanks.
Regards,
Rajeev
SVN revision: 69720
Gustavo Lima Chaves
Carsten Haitzler
Daniel Juyung Seo
WooHyun Jung
ChunEon Park
Sanjeev BA
Cedric BAIL
Thiago Thamada
Michael BOUCHAUD
Mike Blumenkrantz
Hyoyoung Chang
Jihoon Kim
Christopher Michael
Jaehwan Kim
Vincent Torri
chanwook jung
Jonas M. Gastal
cnook
Lucas De Marchi
Daniel Zaoui
Daniel Vieira Franzolin