Summary:
it seems something is leading to weird stack behavior with gcc when we
do not delete the widget here. Later deletion in _elm_win_shutdown leads
to a crash like:
#0 0x00007f7b30dd5bd7 in _elm_win_shutdown () at ../src/lib/elementary/efl_ui_win.c:3805
#1 0x01007f7b30cdf3a2 in ?? ()
#2 0x00007fffa4e60570 in ?? ()
#3 0x0000000000407b14 in _elm_suite_shutdown () at ../src/tests/elementary/suite_helpers.c:52
which is kind of weird. After a day of debugging i did not get any
further, so maybe it is better to do add a hack, so we are having at
least a running CI again
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9112
this can now be done with active_view. This is done in order to reduce
the LOC in elementary that basically do the same.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8920
Summary: this was simply not tested before. But works now.
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9109
Summary:
check can only display 2 states, and is only designed to do so.
Additionally, nstate inherits from button, which
brings in autorepeat, which is hileriously broken on check and cannot
really work.
Right now there is not even support in the theme for clickable. So its a
good idea to get rid of this for now IMO.
ref T7865
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, segfaultxavi, akanad, YOhoho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7865, T7867
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9018
Summary: this is automatically handled by elm_shutdown at the end of every test
Reviewers: YOhoho
Reviewed By: YOhoho
Subscribers: YOhoho, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9087
Summary:
these blocks intentionally trigger warnings/errors, so use test macros
to indicate this
Depends on D8969
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8970
This can be done with Efl.Ui.Active_View
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8907
this widget tries to replace efl.ui.stack efl.ui.flip & efl.ui.pager
In general those widgets do the same thing, they get content. And
display them with some sort of animations. The new idea here is, that
the basic widget active_view only handles the ownership etc. of the
content that gets added to this. Then there is a view_manager object. The
view_manager object gets notified over the new contents, and requests for
displaying particular contents. The transition then handles those
things.
The version here is feature complete with Efl.Ui.Stack and Efl.Ui.Pager.
Additional features can be implemented in the corresponsing transition
classes. Examples and tests will follow
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8784
Summary:
legacy full style item is introduced Efl.Ui.ListEmptyItem Class in new Efl Interface,
but using "Empty" name is too ambiguous to present style usage.
Thanks to @cedric and @segfaultxavi,
I found better name for this class, Efl.Ui.ListPlaceHolderItem,
as item hold the place which need to be replaced and relayouted by user generated content.
Depends on D8582
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi, eagleeye
Reviewed By: eagleeye
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, segfaultxavi, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9034
Summary:
some widgets do not create a minimum size for themselves, resulting in
a 0x0 layout which can affect tests that rely on object visibility to
succeed without errors
Depends on D9007
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9008
Summary:
we want to make it clear in our tests where it is intended that warnings
and errors may occur
Depends on D9005
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9006
Summary:
We now also fail in the focus tests
Depends on D9021
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9022
Summary:
there have been a few cases where things were just wrong. Like missing
regular nodes in a focus manager that received focus, and stuff like
this. This now fixes all those cases.
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9021
This adds support for OpenBSD with meson build
system. Also use better paths. This resolves
further issues when building EFL.`
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9028
Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
The only implementation of this interface, `Efl.Ui.Table`, only supports two fill
directions (horizontal or vertical), therefore the table_direction property which
supports primary and secondary directions is unnecessarily complicated. Remove it
and use only `Efl.Ui.Direction.direction` to select the fill direction.
Also, expanded the documentation.
Fixes T7962
Test Plan:
Everything builds and tests pass. Efl.Ui.Table elementary_test still work.
Examples need to be adjusted to stop using table_direction.
Reviewers: zmike, YOhoho, bu5hm4n, SanghyeonLee, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: YOhoho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7962
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8902
Summary:
frame now uses efl.ui.clickable, which ensures correct click emittion.
The click event is not needed in the event anymore. However, now
efl,action,press / efl,action,unpress is needed.
Depends on D8825
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8826
Summary:
the implementation of efl_ui_clickable is now used to tricker the
events. efl,action,click and efl,action,click,double is not needed
anymore from the theme.
Depends on D8824
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8825
Summary:
the mixin is now used to emit the events of the mixins. This is verified
by the testsuite. The testsuite needs a special treatment for the
object, because a missing image-file of the object would result in a 0x0
image size.
Depends on D8822
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8823
Summary:
the new test checks if the events are correctly emitted
Depends on D8821
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8822
Now, efl_content_iterate, efl_content_count, efl_pack, efl_pack_unpack,
efl_pack_unpack_all and efl_pack_clear are available for relative_layout.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8631
Summary:
Coverity reports that we leak the storage returned from eina_array_new
here, so lets add a call to eina_array_free
Fixes CID1400857
@fix
Depends on D8775
Reviewers: raster, cedric, zmike, bu5hm4n, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8776
Summary:
Coverity reports that we leak the eina_array 'a' here, so add a call
to eina_array_free before we exit
Fixes CID1401003
@fix
Depends on D8765
Reviewers: raster, cedric, zmike, bu5hm4n, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8766
when a widget is marked internal, widgets can use that to behave in
certain ways. Box for example uses this to not alter the widget_parent
property anymore. Which is usefull for when boxes are used internally.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8736
sooo, this test suite is testing interfaces. And when a content needs to
be passed into the API, a lightweight version of a widget will be passed
in. But sometimes implementations *do* requires special classes, they
can now be specified with a custom-mapping in json.
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8701
the pack interface is a general interface for how we pack things into a
container. the align and padding property has less to nothing to do with
this. Hence this commit splits the two properties into theire own
interface.
fix T7825
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8699
for now the widgets which are tested are encoded in the test files where
the tests are implemented. This is for now done in a simple json format,
just for the sake of simplicity.
ref T7815
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8685
Summary:
I forgot `efl_pack_layout_request` after relation_xxx is changed.
Unnecessary register function in `relation_xxx_get` will return unexpected result.
if a object is not child of relative_layout, `relation_xxx_get` should return
`target = NULL` and `relative = 0.0` with error message.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8627
this commit ensures the following:
- Delete content when new content is set
- Content set input validation
- Correct parent setting
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8682
This patchset ensures that the following features are supported:
- content-widget deletion on set content
- content-widget validation on set calls
- invalid cases return false
- event emission
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8681
when you inherit from widget_parent, you MUST call the super function.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8680
Remove evas_table.
This expect to improve performance by removing internal function call related
evas_table.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8615
there are no tests for Efl.Pack_Table for now, so here comes unification
for Efl.Pack tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8557
_pack_at is used to add new subobjects to the table. When a object is
already part of this table, then we should not add it again. Additional,
when there is already a gi structure, but the parent is something else,
then we should NOT just reuse this struct, otherwise we might use a
struct reference that we do not own. The struct could be owned by
another table widget.
The test must be adjusted, before we did not error on adding a widget
twice. Now we do (just like in box). Hence we should not do that in
test.
Reviewed-by: YeongJong Lee <yj34.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8554
We have two elementary test suite, what is more obvious than just adding
a third one! This testsuite aims for establishing a standard behaviour
for the interfaces we have added in efl now. This first part here brings
a few testcases for Efl.Pack which are currently only passing for
Efl.Ui.Box. More widgets will be added afterwards.
The testcases themself are not defined after what worked or did not
work, but rather what made sence (in my opinion ^_^).
ref T7767
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8518
Remove legacy stuff from Efl.Ui.Box.
This expect to improve performance by removing internal function call related
evas_box.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8417
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Carsten Haitzler
SangHyeon Jade Lee
Alastair Poole
Xavi Artigas
Yeongjong Lee
Lauro Moura
Christopher Michael
Yeongjong Lee
Cedric BAIL