pause event means that the window is not visible anymore to any user.
resume is triggered when the window became visible again or just
became visible again.
Note: The distinction is made on how the window was created, not on
which API is used (evas_object_lower or efl_gfx_stack_lower or
elm_win_lower).
Ref T5322
Note: elm_test "Focus Style" can be used to test this API. The test case
is a bit broken (overly complex EDC?) but if you're patient you can see
the difference between "glow" and "glow_effect".
Ref T5363
Ref T5322
Fake: This should never have had the fake_canvas_set API. It already can
not work after efl_finalize. And Ecore_Evas isn't part of EO API so it
doesn't make sense at this point to try to expose the fake window as
part of EO API.
Socket: This is the only type of window that implements socket_listen.
So we can just move this function to a new subclass.
NOTE: Socket & plug are currently broken, even in 1.20 (at least for me)!
Ref T5322
Summary:
Implement efl_provider_find function for efl_ui_win class.
This will support to search window class by efl_provider_find function.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, thiepha, woohyun, Blackmole
Reviewed By: jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5045
This is really only a demonstration of what kind of information
we can print with efl_debug_name_get(). Hopefully this can help
debugging with printf/ERR logs and even help with live debugging
inside gdb.
This shouldn't be used for other purposes than debugging, as the
exact string format is not defined.
@feature
All windows should be standard, really. Except when using legacy
elm_win_add() or if type_set() was called with a specific type.
I dislike type_set...
Ref T5322
This removes Evas.Modifier_Mask from EO.
This introduces two new types instead:
- Efl.Input.Modifier
- Efl.Input.Lock
Those are enums, not strings, containing all the known and
currently supported lock and modifier keys. The enums are
bit masks.
This effectively removes the ability for an application to
create and handle specific modifier or lock keys - with EO
API (legacy compatibility is unchanged, of course). I wonder
who ever required this?
The efl_ui_win overrides _elm_interface_atspi_component_extents_get to give
correct value if screen_coord is EINA_FALSE which means relative position.
The efl_ui_win has given its object geometry value + ecore evas geometry value.
The object geometry value was equal to the ecore evas geometry value, so the
relative position was not correct(twice of ecore evas geometry value).
We have a tag for unstable API, use it. It'll be visible in the
doc and force users to add the macro before being able to compile
code.
This amends d8dd685966.
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
teamwork api in elm win (efl_ui_win) has a few issues:
1. it directly ddigs into ecore_wl2 and uses internal headers to use
zwp_* api's directly... which effectively tied elementary directly to
libwayland and thats not a good thing - thats why ecore_wl2 exists -
to act as a layer in between
2. the only thing that supports it is e and only wiht a module and
there is no fallback code in elm to work outside this environment, so
it's kind of broken by design and will not actually reliably work
3. from a stability and security point of view, and api and protocol
that allow a client to ask your wm/compositor to open ANY url - go
make a network request possibly to a hostile url/site is bad. needing
to handle so so so so many protocols, file types etc. etc. is going to
lead to issues that SHOULD at least be isolated in the app, but now it
spreads into your wm/compositor too. :(
4. there is ZERO benefit to asking the wm to do this. the app is
using efl already. it already has all the same abilities with the same
libraries to download/display etc. so why doesnt the app do it itself?
5. doesnt work in windows, osx, framebuffer (fbcon or drm)... only in
x11 and wayland. (and then only with e + module)
6. there is no way to detect if it's going to work and write your own
fallback (which shouldnt be needed/done anyway).
nice work and enthusiasm on making teamwork but it just isn't the right
thing - not in its current form and not by design (security reasons) :(
@deprecate
this adds the a stack of windows (view stack, something like naviframe
but using multiple windows instead) to elementary allowing windows to
be put into a stack and treated as one "application" when ijn such a
stack with the newest window on top being the active/focused one (or
should be). this allows for special show/hide animations as well as
possibly special sizing policies and placement policies.
@feature
evas_object_size_hint_max() would not work on a window, unless
it somehow managed to not size itself (which would be another
issue). This patch allows apps to call size_hint_max_set() on
a window. A test case is provided in elm_test (Dialog).
@feature
The idea is to not have resize object in a stack anymore,
but a couple of swallows in the frame and if the stack of
resize objects is wanted, then the user can still explicitely
create it.
Use Efl.Part for window to manipulate the background.
Two part names are used in EDC:
- elm.rect.background
- elm.swallow.background
For apps the part name is only "background".
To set a solid color background (alpha is ok):
efl_gfx_color_set(efl_part(win, "background"), r, g, b, a);
To set an image:
efl_file_set(efl_part(win, "background"), "image.jpg", NULL);
To set an object:
efl_content_set(efl_part(win, "background"), subobj);
The solid bg is invisible by default, will become visible and use
COPY render mode if a color is set. Standard window uses the
swallow part.
@feature
The result of this API can only guarantee that the request has been forwared to the server,
In fact, there is no guarantee that the request can be processed by the server.
In order to use this API correctly, avoid the following conditions.
(The following situations will return a failure)
1. Calling a function in the absence of a touch(mouse) down event.
2. Calling the function twice more than once before the touch(mouse) up event.
3. Calling the function when the elm win already resizing or moving the window.
4. Calling the function using a combination of unsupported modes.
Right usage
1. touch(mouse) down event
2. efl_ui_win_move_resize_start only once using the supported mode combination.
3. touch(mouse) up event
If a touch(mouse) up event occurs after calling the function, it automatically ends the window move and resize operation.
Since there are some non-exclusive modes, you can use a combination of modes.(ELM_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_MOVE is exclusive with others)
However, Some combination of mode is limited for technical reasons.
At present, only the following nine combinations are allowed.
For more information, see the Elm.Win.Move_Resize_Mode.
1. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_MOVE
2. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_TOP
3. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_BOTTOM
4. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_LEFT
5. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_RIGHT
6. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_TOP | EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_LEFT
7. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_TOP | EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_RIGHT
8. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_BOTTOM | EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_LEFT
9. EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_BOTTOM | EFL_UI_WIN_MOVE_RESIZE_RIGHT
Jean-Philippe Andre
Cedric BAIL
Daniel Kolesa
Lukasz Stanislawski
Taehyub Kim
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Shinwoo Kim
Carsten Haitzler
Chris Michael
Jee-Yong Um
Stefan Schmidt
Ji-Youn Park