Add 4 rectangles to be used as border of the window, instead of a single
rectangle under the framespace. This allows to move the frame object to
the top layer, instead of staying on the lowest layer. With the frame
over the other objects, there's no need of framespace clipper object,
which causes several bugs.
The frame should not stay in the same layer as the other objects. If the
application wants to allow it to be on top of the content, then it must
provide a custom frame object and set it to that layer.
NOTE: Should we make Elementary's be on a lower layer too?
The real canvas size contains enough space for rendering the frame, but
ecore_evas_geometry_get() should be consistent accross all the engines
and report only the client area.
When creating windows directly with Ecore_Evas, instead of using
Elementary, a default smart object is provided for the frame (client
side window decorations).
Now this smart object inherits from the clipped smart object, which
means that all its member objects will be clipped to its main clipper,
being skipped when the framespace clipper checks for objects without a
clipper.
Fix a ticket, which I don't remember the number because trac doesn't
work.
It is a very tricky things to get header order right on windows. Having that
order only in .c files simplify the work a lot. So let's try to do it with
Ecore_Evas after it rewrite and split into modules.
This will update the edges info inside the Evas_Engine_Info, and make it
correctly resize to the top/left if needed.
Also call ecore_wl_window_buffer_attach() on the egl engine, since it's
needed after the ecore_wl_window_update_size().
This will force the window to correctly update its size when the event
is received by the compositor, rather than just after an
ecore_evas_resize().
It fixes the window resizing of non-elementary applications, since
the elementary window already deals with such resize by calling
ecore_evas_resize.
Using the server_allocation/allocation to determine the resize offset
was not completely precise, and causing the window to not always resize
correctly.
Additionally, calling evas_engine_info_set() on every resize step caused
the window content to blink and resize very slow, because the swap
buffer, swapper, and everything were being destroyed and recreated. Now
only the swapbuf_reconfigure is being called during the resize, which is
way faster.
I add new example related with this. (ecore_evas_extn_socket & plug example)
ecore extn use this infrasturcture, server app and client app can communicate each other
later, this can be used to contorl access message
SVN revision: 83942
This will allow it to report to Ecore_Evas that the window has changed
its state. Elementary uses this to update its maximized/fullscreen/other
window states internal information.
The code that uses this callback is also added to Ecore_Evas.
SVN revision: 83625
It's needed to set the edge where the middle click is being done in
order to allow Evas know which direction the resize should take.
SVN revision: 83610
This avoids blocking in eglSwapBuffers and has the side effect of
avoiding doing unnecessary work - painting where a frame won't be
presented.
We do this by using the event that the wayland compositor will send us
to tell us that the frame has been presented. Due to the fact that
evas_render_updates() could do no work and not cause a eglSwapBuffers we
must always have a frame callback listener setup.
Original patch by: Rob Bradford <rob@linux.intel.com>
(I just adjusted the patch to the single efl tree)
SVN revision: 83387
Before this commit, when using any of the wayland backends, if the user
requested an ecore_evas window of width x height, the reported size of
the window would include the frames width and height.
Now the requested size is stored on the ecore_evas and reported when
ecore_evas_geometry_get() is used, although the ecore_evas is still
created with additional space for the frame area.
This is one of the reasons causing bug #1673.
SVN revision: 83042
Implementing support for loadables modules. It makes the engines been
loaded when they are needed. It not breakes the api, so each engine
still has its own api.
The implementation basically is:
* Functions that creates Ecore_Evas, for example
ecore_evas_software_x11_new, request to load its module and then get
the module's function to create the Ecore_Evas.
* The other functions such as \(.*\)_window_get from the Ecore_Evas
its interface and then call the appropriate method.
* As there is no unified interface to communicate with the engines
(not break api problem), all interfaces were declared in
ecore_evas_private.h
* Now the data necessary for each module is not declared in the
Ecore_Evas_Engine structure, instead of this, the struct has a void
pointer that is used by the modules.
* In this first moment engines as software_x11 and gl_x11 were put
together in the same module, but obviously exporting all the things
necessary.
SVN revision: 80280
Chris Michael
Rafael Antognolli
Rafael Antognolli
Cedric BAIL
Cedric Bail
Jiyoun Park
Rafael Antognolli
Flavio Vinicius Alvares Ceolin