Wherever the EO API is used, i.e. efl_add() is used to create evas
objects, we can skip the calls to set fill/expand.
This new set of defaults indeed saves ~60 loc in the tests (out of 115
objects created). I found only 3 cases where the align had to be set
manually (to the old default of 0.5).
See 1a1b8bc451
And e8b7f5f255
Ref T5301
All windows should be standard, really. Except when using legacy
elm_win_add() or if type_set() was called with a specific type.
I dislike type_set...
Ref T5322
This implements an entirely new API model for Evas Map by relying
on high-level transformations on the object rather than an external
Evas_Map structure that needs to be constantly updated manually.
The implementation relies on Evas_Map.
To rotate an object all you need to do now is
efl_gfx_map_rotate(obj, 45.0, NULL, 0.5, 0.5);
Or with a C++ syntax:
obj.rotate(45.0, NULL, 0.5, 0.5);
Or even simply (with default arguments):
obj.rotate(45.0);
The map transformation functions are:
- rotate
- rotate_3d
- rotate_quat
- zoom
- translate (new!)
- perspective_3d
- lightning_3d
@feature
Manual points population will eventually be useless as the
map API will become more like a transformation API, where
the current object geometry doesn't matter as much as which
transformation is applied to it.
This make save() work on snapshot objects, provided the call
is done from inside render_post.
Also, this saves the filtered output of an image, rather than
its source pixels. Any call to save() on a filtered image must
be done from post-render as well.
Fixes T2102
@feature
This will reuse existing buffers by resetting only the minimum
required in the filter context (also reused). Work in progress,
as the actual reuse is disabled for now.
When using a snapshot object we have access to exactly all
the pixels below it inside the snapshot surface. So, in order
to produce a nice blur, it is necessary to expand this snapshot
and then clip it otherwise the edges will look a bit ugly.
Unfortunately, there are still places where blurs didn't look
so good, as objects below an opaque region would never get
rendered into the snapshot object. So the edges, inside a
snapshot object, around an opaque region would have blur
artifacts.
This fixes that by shrinking the cutout regions by the radius
of the filter. Eg for blur this is the blur radius.
The test case in elm_test can exhibit this fix very clearly:
a red glow would be visible around the opaque rectangle, but with
these changes we instead see the blurry edges of the objects
below the rectangle.
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Carsten Haitzler