Change Description:
- Year min/max values are moved to elm_config.
- Format specifier must come along with % followed by any separator. ( % 123d is not supported but %d will denote Date format specifier)
- Field separator can constitute multiple spaces, Space followed by any other non format specifier is also treated as the separator till its max length. ( %d x/ %b #2 format displays 27 x/ Mar #2 )
Thanks, Sumanth
Submitted-By-Off Sumanth Krishna Mannam<sumanth.m@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 69846
Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I talked with seoz. and agreed with previous naming changing is
insufficient.
>
> so changed like this
> "mode_" -> "deco_it_"
> "edit_" -> "deco_all_"
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained.
>> I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
>>
>> "edit_" -> "deco_"
>> and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
>>
>> Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
SVN revision: 69836
for this change.
Revert "After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained."
This reverts commit 5e1aa3c8b0382a0ca471150f4c219cd32dbdbe22.
SVN revision: 69835
I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
"edit_" -> "deco_" and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
SVN revision: 69793
Subject: [E-devel] [patch][elementary] elc_popup, restack issue
The elc_popup does not raise to the top of its layer even though
evas_object_raise() is called with the popup object.
Because the elm_widget_resize_object_set(); makes notify object which is
internally used in the popup have a smart parent.
Ultimately, the callback function for EVAS_CALLBACK_RESTACK of the
notify
is not called.
So I removed elm_widget_resize_object_set(); from the popup and added
some
implementations to show the popup properly.
Moreover, I have added test code also in the attached patch. Then,
please
review the patch and give any feedbacks. Thanks.
SVN revision: 69790
1. delete old content object
2. check whether new content object is same as old content object
3. rename internal content set hook function
4. elm_widget_sub_object_del will be followed by evas_object_del
5. added some doxygen description.
SVN revision: 69738
<hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I made a patch about flip_realize.
> Currently flip feature uses content_objs, so it should keep its
content_objs.
> However it's lost at _item_flips_realize().
> So i fixed to initialize with its content_objs.
>
> Thanks
SVN revision: 69725
Attached to the mail is a patch for elm_panes.
I have a query that shall we hide the unset content in the widget itself or should application explicitly hide them after unsetting!
In case of edje_object_part_unswallow, application needs to do it explicitly and it is documented but in case of elm_object_part_content_unset, there is no documentation available.
Details of the patch:
Existing Issue before this change:
1. Panes deletes the older content while setting a new content even though both are same.
2. left and right content are being unswallowed in the content_left_set and _content_right_unset functions. So when the reparenting happens, say when the content is put inside a layout then only _sub_del gets called and
unswallowing does not happen as these functions do not get called.
e.g. @@ -253,8 +250,6 @@ _content_left_unset(Evas_Object *obj)
if (!wd->contents.left) return NULL;
Evas_Object *content = wd->contents.left;
elm_widget_sub_object_del(obj, content); //wd->contents.left already gets set to NULL in _sub_del
- edje_object_part_unswallow(wd->panes, content); // can be unswallowed in _sub_del as in case of reparenting like setting content in a layout, only _sub_del will get called, not this function
- wd->contents.left = NULL; //this instruction is redundent as it happens in _sub_del anyway
return content;
}
Change Description:
1. Unswallowing the contents now in _sub_del as this is a common function to be executed when subobject removal happens.
2. Comparing the current content with new before deleting.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r@samsumg.com>
Thanks.
Regards,
Rajeev
SVN revision: 69720
Jaehwan Kim
ChunEon Park
WooHyun Jung
Daniel Juyung Seo
Vincent Torri
Carsten Haitzler
cnook
Mike Blumenkrantz
Michael BOUCHAUD