Summary:
this logic brings a few problems:
- When files are annonced here, without the monitor having the context
of the files, immidiat actions like deletion of the file are resulting
in no deletion event. Which is definitly a bug, so we need to wait here
for the monitor.
- When a new count is annonced before the files are there from the
monitor, we are heading towards the same issue - additionally, we might
already have files available, due to the custom counting that are not
annoncned through the monitor, which means, at a later pointer we are
annoncing a new file which is already available via the API.
Right now i do not see a way to continue with this code, it caused major
issues with our CI and the POLL backend, for now things do work again.
Depends on D9624
Reviewers: zmike, stefan_schmidt, cedric, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9625
Summary:
if an event is emitted for a child that is added to the model during a
call to _efl_io_model_children_list(), it's possible that this child
will never be detected by the model's monitor/sentry if it is deleted
before the monitor can detect it, which means there will never be a
corresponding eio event emitted
in this case, ensure that we manually remove this child from the model
since we know we've just deleted it
this fixes reliability issues with efl io model monitor unit test
@fix
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9708
It kind of worked by luck for 6 months, but really shouldn't. This
is now a custom iterator that will walk the string part of the properties
only. It could become a generic iterator if necessary one day, but
for now, it is fine just here.
T7771
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9075
Summary:
if the wref automatically removes this pointer then there's no need to
remove the wref on the pointer
@fix
Depends on D8973
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8974
Summary:
Little introduction into what eio did before this commit:
Efl.Io.Model creation:
- direct ls of a directory in a thread (A)
- take all the contents of a directory and feed it slowly back into
the mainloop
- when all events have been feeded back to the mainloop and have been
processed: start monitoring (B)
However, any file created between (A) and (B) will not be in the model,
since not the listing nor the monitoring did caputure it. Hence we need
to start monitoring before we actaully start listing. In the callbacks
we then check if we already published something.
ref T7311
Reviewers: zmike, cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7311
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8525
There is no point in keeping a pointer to the main loop now that we
are using efl_future_then. This resolve potential bug with leftover
dangling weak reference as efl_future_then do require a free case
otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8374
Summary:
This make sure that the object returned by children_slice_get are properly
destroyed when the refcount drop to only the parent holding a reference on
it. This make it clear that the user of the api can rely on efl_ref/efl_unref
to actually manage its use of the returned object.
Additionnaly we are cleaning up the created object that we are using to build our own
request inside the Efl.Io.Model and avoid internal leak.
Depends on D7864
Reviewers: felipealmeida, segfaultxavi, SanghyeonLee, zmike, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7528
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7865
Summary:
As the result of discussion in T7458,
we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence.
I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43
few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming.
| Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model |
| Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model |
| Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model |
I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used,
but as I tested, there is no issue found yet.
Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model,
but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace,
so I left it future work.
Test Plan:
Run the Make Test,
it works well except Efl test about selection.
there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model,
I reported it and will fix it in another patch.
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: lauromoura
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
Marcel Hollerbach
Mike Blumenkrantz
Cedric BAIL
Vincent Torri
Jaehyun Cho
SangHyeon Jade Lee