before this commit, push would add before the current element, pop would
return to the next higher element.
after this commit, push would add after the current element, pop would
return to the previous element.
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10781
this introduces the test requested in D10701. And checks that all
signals are correctly delivered even if animations are frozen
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10767
the spotlight now is setting the overall correct min and max size on
itself. Additionally, the page size is now clamped to the size of the
container.
Correct min size of the container is defined to the MAX min size of all
the content.
The correct max size of the container is defined to the MIN max size of
all the content.
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10766
this new API makes it possible to stop animations beeing executed in the
spotlight manager. (The logic in the spotlight managers itself are
already implemented).
The animation will also be frozen during construction time of the
spotlight.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10701
There exist several flags to indicate whether an object should be animated, with inconsistent names:
Efl.Canvas.Layout.animation: bool indicating if Edje animations should be played
Efl.Ui.Spotlight_Manager.animation_enabled: bool indicating if page transitions should be animated
Efl.Canvas.Animation_Player.animation: Efl.Canvas.Animation object
This commit unifies all of them: "animated" is now a flag, and "animation" is an object.
Note: Animation_Player is in the process of being replaced by an "animation" property in the
Efl.Canvas.Object, hence the need for non-clashing animation flags.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10645
`efl_ui_smart_transition_lifetime` test causes segfault
when compile with `clang`.
Fixes half of T8277
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10221
after playing arround with the widget, we found out that it feels quite
weird to have a index, where most of the time you work with widgets.
We might want to add syntax suger in the future to make it easier to
just jump to the next element, or to the previous, but that still is to
be decided.
The event and the communication to the spotlight manager are still left
to be used with the index, reason for this is, that we might need to
fill there an invalid pointer, if a deletion is triggering an animation,
which seems quite weird. That needs further discussing.
Docx have been updated, the sitemarks about the shifting of the
active_index can be removed, as the element is not subject of change
during content adds/deletes.
ref T7991
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9813
setting the parent here is usefull, as we can forgot about this object
then, and do not have to free the object by hand.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9305
view_manager is a property that takes ownership of the view_manager
object. We are setting the parent in the setter which means, we should
actaully have one ref to the parent, and one from the caller, so we need
to unref one.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9304
View is something that is expected in the context of MVVM, so using it somewhere else is
going to lead to some confusion. Spotlight does descrive the objective of all of this
widget in actually a more explicit way as they all give the spotlight to one sub widget
at a time.
I have also renamed the View_Manager to be just Manager as the View there wasn't useful.
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Bruno da Silva Belo
Cedric BAIL