Summary:
these are all types that we do not currently want to release
Depends on D8102
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8241
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
Summary:
This commit removes some clashes (i.e. names as classes and namespaces
at the same time). It'll avoid nested items that are either forbidden
(C#) or problematic (Python) in some languages.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7260
Summary: I had fixed some typos and some wrong expressions in API reference doc
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: raster, zmike, Hermet, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6943
Summary:
All events must have a type now, otherwise bindings don't know how to handle
the event_info field.
Most of the missing event types were actually "void" (no event_info present).
Some struct definitions had to be moved to eo instead of h files, so they
are available to bindings. Some have not, and are marked with FIXME.
Some namespaces have been fixed (like Efl_Event_Cb -> Efl.Event_Cb).
In general, there are hundreds of changed files, but mostly to add a type which
was not present before, so there's no harm done.
Also, A lot of FIXMEs have been added which should be, like, fixed.
For example, some events can send different types of event_info, which is
very inconvenient (and error prone).
Test Plan: make with c# bindings works, make check and make examples work too.
Reviewers: cedric, q66, lauromoura
Subscribers: zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6169
we really should have data inside the loop object, so begin moving it
one small thing at a time. this is the basics that will allow multiple
efl loops. make an eo efl object and class for fd handlers that is efl loop
bound make fd handlers really bound to their parent loop and not global as
well as have a nice class/obj. create an message queue per loop and
put legacy ecore events on top of it... and a lot more.
this is not 100% done, but it's a lot of the core and groundwork.
various ecore_timer_add(), ecore_diler_add() etc. need changes.
The following still need doing:
ecore_timer (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idler (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idle_enterer
ecore_idle_exiter
ecore_pollers? (is the new efl loop stuff ok?)
ecore_exe (fork/spawn from any thread and track exe from that thread?)
ecore_signal code
ecore_throttle (should we have a single global too? we have per loop)
ecore_app ? (should every loop be given its own argv/argc?)
Lots of internal ecore code uses/calls these legacy calls and we
should have efl loop replacements and/or use the ones we have
The following will bedifferently designed for loop to loop
control/messaging/ipc:
ecore_thread
ecore_pipe
Xavi Artigas
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Lauro Moura
Myoungwoon Roy, Kim
Daniel Kolesa
Andy Williams
Carsten Haitzler