So, it seems my previous commit 79abba52c5 was a job
half done, as I forgot to remove Evas.Image from the inheritance
tree of all new evas image classes.
Somehow, there was code in the tree that apparently isn't tested at all, even
once - if it was, the eo.c logic that performs inheritance checks would be
triggered. I don't know how this could have happened (actually I do, it's
Cedric's fault and he should be publicly shamed for it) but these checks
make sure this will never happen again. But since the code itself appears
to be untested, I don't know if there isn't any other brokenness in it.
But that's beyond the scope of this change, so for now, let's make sure
all our inheritance is at least formally correct.
Also, enable eo_interface.eo generated code in Eo itself so that Eo.Interface
can be used when inheriting.
@fix
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
This is a bit artificial, as all image objects are still based on
the Evas.Image main class. The inheritance tree alone does not
give much information on what features are supported by which
class (eg. only Efl.Canvas.Image supports the file interface for
file_set).
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen
Jean-Philippe Andre