Summary:
each test case can run in parallel, so this provides a ~300% speedup
ref T6850
Depends on D5904
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6850
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5905
Summary:
these aren't tested so don't init/shutdown for every test
ref T6850
Depends on D5903
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6850
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5904
Summary:
* check inside thread callbacks whether thread has been canceled
* clean up (global) objects
* wait for threads to die before exiting each test
ref T6851
Depends on D5889
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6851
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5890
Summary:
this function is just a wrapper, avoid downloading the same file
multiple times
ref T6853
Depends on D5885
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6853
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5886
Summary:
while it may be the case that we do not control example.com, it is also
the case that loading anything from enlightenment.org takes 10+ seconds
longer (at minimum) than loading example.com
ref T6853
Depends on D5884
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6853
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5885
Summary:
unit tests should verify only small pieces of functionality to ensure
that they are testing what they claim to be testing
fix T6852
Depends on D5882
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6852
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5883
Summary:
these are able to run now that a dbus session is always launched
Depends on D5880
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5881
Summary:
this is buggy somehow and prints its info a few dozen times, likely
taking longer to print the info than to run the actual test
Depends on D5879
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5880
Summary:
check does not internally do any parallelizing and is impossible to use
with threads, so using fork appears to be the only viable option for
using more cpu without radically redesigning all existing tests
ref T6825
ref T6848
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6848, T6825
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5877
A negative test case leads to segmentation fault.
If ecore_evas_msg_parent_send is called with NULL data, then slice->mem would
be NULL, and _efl_io_queue_efl_io_writer_write calls memcpy with NULL src.
Old version algorithm was imperfection a bit, quality was poor at some specific
degrees, specifically, when pixel increment pattern on the diagonal lines is
unstable.
This revised version was better than old one even source code is much cleaner
and simpler.
See belows.
*NonAA vs AA:
https://ibb.co/bCNfMc
*Compare the worst case aa in the old version:
https://ibb.co/bEJsZx
*Test video:
https://youtu.be/Wn20Tym5lfg
Summary:
The tap_finger_size value of the concept is different from the finger_size value used in the past.
We need a minimum value for recognize the gesture as a tap or not.
Since the actual screen has different screen sizes, there is a problem that the recognition rate of tap is lowered when using the existing value(finger_size)
Test Plan: elementary_test -> gesture sample.
Reviewers: cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho, herb, id213sin
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5842
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary: After migration this code in Tizen. The coverity said it needs to check return value(CID 39562).
Reviewers: raster, myoungwoon, woohyun, cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5907
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
this commit add null check.
In EVAS_OBJECT_DATA_SAFE_GET, if eo_obj is null, obj can also be null.
and In _efl_canvas_output_async_block() can return null.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: woohyun, kimcinoo, cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5870
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
w and h must not be zero.
because of the divide_by_zero exception occurs on line 649 and 653.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: woohyun, kimcinoo, cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5873
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
we have to check whether all of descendant are none_logical.
this fixes T6800
Test Plan:
1. elementary_test -to ctxpopup
2. Click 'Ctxpopup with user content'
3. Try focus ctxpopup content(button) using arrow key.
4. Check that the content is focused (you can move scroll bar)
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: raster, cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6800
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5856
i am not sure when this stopped working, elm hover sends focus to the
children it has, thus the propergation line for the key down events is
going from the hover up accross the over parent, however, the
hoverparent can be different to the hoversel, which would lead to
missing navigation in the hoversel.
this fixes T6802
This reverts commit c6ce04e48f.
OK. I bisected and found that this is ythe root cause for 2 pretty
chunky bugs. Reverting this fixes T6870 and fixes T6871.
so that's 2 segvs in existing uses and even olne (elm config) ships
with efl. Having a look at the diff doesn't jump out what is wrong
here, but the best course IMHO is to take this patch and put it back
into review again... :)