Reverting this at Felipe's request following my email. There are many
things I strongly object to in this commit. I've touched the surface of
those on the ML (which doesn't work at the moment), though we need to
better discuss it.
The gist:
1. dlsym is a really bad hack that is not even needed.
2. I don't see why eo should even be aware of promises. It's not aware
of list, hash and etc.
3. The eolian changes were done wrong.
This should have been discussed and consulted before done, even if only
because of the amount of hacks it includes and the cross-domain (ecore,
eo and eolian) nature of it.
This reverts commit f9ba80ab33.
While we had the functionality to generate type stubs header we never had
these tested in our unit test setup. Adding to simple cases for struct
and typedef which we already use for normal header generation tests.
Imagine this. You have an object. You pass this object handle as a
message to another thread. Let's say it's not a UI object, so
something you might expect to be able to be accessed from multiple
threads. In order to keep the object alive you eo_ref() it when
placing the message on a queue and eo_unref() it once the message is
"done" in the other thread. If the original sender unref()ed the
object before the message is done, then the object will be destroyed
in the reciever thread. This is bad for objects "expecting" not to be
destroyed outside their owning thread.
This allows thius situation to be fixed. A constructor in a class of
an object can set up a delete interceptor. For example if we have a
"loop ownership" class you multi-ple-inherit from/use as a mixin. This
class will set up the interceptor to ensure that on destruction if
pthread_self() != owning loop thread id, then add object to "delete
me" queue on the owning loop and wake it up. the owning loop thread
will wake up and then process this queue and delete the queued objects
nicely and safely within the "owning context".
This can also be used in this same manner to defer deletion within a
loop "until later" in the same delete_me queue.
You can even use this as a caching mechanism for objects to prevernt
their actual destruction and instead place them in a cached area to be
picked from at a later date.
The uses are many for this and this is a basic building block for
future EFL features like generic messages where a message payload
could be an eo object and thus the above loop onwership issue can
happen and needs fixing.
This adds APIs, implementation, documentation (doxy reference) and tests.
@feature
Add a promise object that allows Eolian interface to include promises
as a way to have asynchronous value return and composibility.
The usage is like this in a .eo file:
class Foo {
methods {
bar {
params {
promise: Promise<int>;
}
}
}
}
Which will create the following API interface:
void foo_bar(Ecore_Promise** promise);
and the equivalent declaration for implementation.
However, the API function will instantiate the Promise for the
user and the implementer of the class.
With scim installed we can run into hangs of the test suite when the ecore_imf
scim module tries to connect to the scim on the system. This has happened again
and again on different installations and made the test suite really fragile.
We would need to make sure that scim is configured on the host before we could
run this test. It might be a candidate for skipped tests where we check if the
env has all we need to run the test and if not skip it. We don not have all the
needed pieces in place for this so the best we can do to make the test runs less
fragile is disabling scim module loading for now.
Mostly unused vars following the removal of eo_do_ret().
However, there are some cases where the migration script got some things
wrong, and I had to manually fix them.
I just ran my script (email to follow) to migrate all of the EFL
automatically. This commit is *only* the automatic conversion, so it can
be easily reverted and re-run.
The migration scripts breaks with some weird cases, here I manually
migrated some parts, and just removed the eo_do from others without
actually migrating (so I could deal with that later).
These outputs are not giving any more information besides what we already get:
Ecore C++ headers compilePASS: tests/ecore_cxx/cxx_compile_test
(Ignoring the problem with the newline) The test name tells it all and we are
just filling the log.
- Remove @beta flags,
- Update @since to match stabilization,
- Change methods to properties with keys,
- Use eo_prefix and add filter_ prefix to all properties since
they use very generic names,
The filter API stays under Efl.Gfx since there are other kinds of
filters, and this one is the particular "graphical filter" or
"effect" API.
The EO API mostly not change from an application point of view,
except for "source_get" which now returns a string directly. Also,
state and data can now be queried.
The tests were assuming that textblock returns a sanitised utf8 string.
This is not always correct, because textblock may cache and return the
set utf8 markup if the text hasn't changed since the last set.
Summary:
When only ellipsis is changed from 0.0~1.0 to -1.0 without resize,
the text is never updated. Because, previous state for ellipsis is never kept
and used properly to check when Evas Text needs to be updated.
It does not have any effect when ellipsis is changed from -1.0 to 0.0~1.0.
Because, Evas text always resize itself according to its text size.
So, necessarily, Evas text object has to be resized to the smaller size.
Commonly, Edje will handle its size if Evas text needs to be ellipsized.
@fix
Test Plan: Test case is included.
Reviewers: tasn, woohyun, herdsman
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3448
Summary:
Factorisation of the infra
make uniform all the tests
Test rework #1: Ecore
Test rework #2: Ecore_Con
Test rework #3: Ecore_Cxx
Test rework #4: Ector
Test rework #5: Edje
Test rework #6: Eet
This one is big: I had to split the huge eet_suite.c into separate test files
and it needs more review
Test rework #7: Eet_Cxx
Test rework #8: Eeze
eeze_suite.c has also been splitted
Test rework #9: Efreet
this efreet test suite needs more love later
Test rework #10: Eina
mainly minor stuff: whitespaces, order of includes, ... Just don't fear the number
of changed files :-)
Test rework #11: Eina_Cxx
Test rework #12: Eio
Test rework #13: ElDbus
Test rework #14: ElDbus_Cxx
Test rework #15: Elua
Test rework #16: Emile
Test rework #17: Eo
I've only touched the suite/ subdir. Maybe we should merege the others into
the test suite in suite/
Test rework #18: Eolian
Test rework #19: Eolian_Cxx
Test rework #20: Evas
Test rework #21: Evil
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, tasn
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3654
Tom Hacohen
Vitor Sousa
Stefan Schmidt
Carsten Haitzler
Felipe Magno de Almeida
Daniel Kolesa
Jean-Philippe Andre
Vivek Ellur
se.osadchy
Youngbok Shin
Vincent Torri