forked from enlightenment/efl
1. The word "class" is a pain point with many languages where it's a keyword. Type is a little better. Also, the property was already named "device_type" and not "device_class". 2. Remove Efl.Input.Device.Sub_Class It's not used inside EFL upstream codebase, and unlikely to be used anywhere else (even in Tizen). Hopefully no one used the Efl_ enum types. So far only the Evas_ types should be in used. Ref T5540 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
ecore_evas_extn.c | ||
ecore_evas_extn_buf.c | ||
ecore_evas_extn_engine.h |