forked from enlightenment/efl
use our custom version to test dirfd().
it was reported that AC_CHECK_FUNCS() couldn't work on netbsd because dirfd is a macro and it would not properly evaluate int that traditional test. SVN revision: 82736
This commit is contained in:
parent
e21bfbbbb2
commit
f07856769a
|
@ -537,7 +537,6 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([\
|
||||||
backtrace \
|
backtrace \
|
||||||
backtrace_symbols \
|
backtrace_symbols \
|
||||||
clearenv \
|
clearenv \
|
||||||
dirfd \
|
|
||||||
execvp \
|
execvp \
|
||||||
fpathconf \
|
fpathconf \
|
||||||
fstatat \
|
fstatat \
|
||||||
|
@ -551,7 +550,7 @@ strlcpy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
AC_FUNC_ALLOCA
|
AC_FUNC_ALLOCA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
EFL_CHECK_FUNCS([EFL], [fnmatch gettimeofday])
|
EFL_CHECK_FUNCS([EFL], [fnmatch gettimeofday dirfd])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
have_atfile_source="${ac_cv_func_fstatat}"
|
have_atfile_source="${ac_cv_func_fstatat}"
|
||||||
AC_DEFINE_IF([HAVE_ATFILE_SOURCE],
|
AC_DEFINE_IF([HAVE_ATFILE_SOURCE],
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue