_try_proc() is how to find a symbol based on /proc/self/maps, not
related to argv0.
change _try_proc() to ifdef inside... avoiding the need to ifdef at
definition and call site.
SVN revision: 82469
* tests will run locally now, not just from installed files.
* efreet_init_new(NULL) is valid, actually used by efreet_desktop_save()
SVN revision: 82428
efreet used an uncommon PACKAGE_DATA_DIR without the package name
because it used that to populate default variables.
Add another variable for that and make PACKAGE_DATA_DIR more common.
Tests still fails like crazy, and they assume installed data :-(
SVN revision: 82426
Weirdly enough raster turned PROGRAM cache on to fix a bug saying that
the other path was not tested, but from IN-EFL/edje/configure.ac CALC
cache was enabled and PROGRAM was disabled.
I kept the PROGRAM on and enabled CALC. Added fixed point as well.
Cedric, Raster: should we keep PROGRAM and CALC cache options if the
other path is not tested? Can't we assume they are always on? How much
memory these cache add? Can't this be reduced?
SVN revision: 82410
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:50:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ecore-wayland: Improve opaque setting logic.
1. Update win->region.opaque in ecore_wl_window_update_size, so that
the opaque info is synced with the geometry.
2. Add win->surface checking in ecore_wl_window_buffer_attach
before send any wl_surface related request, it will avoid segfault
in case that calling ecore_wl_window_buffer_attach() before
ecore_wl_window_show().
Signed-off-by: Christopher Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 82385
1. Update win->region.opaque in ecore_wl_window_update_size, so that
the opaque info is synced with the geometry.
2. Add win->surface checking in ecore_wl_window_buffer_attach
before send any wl_surface related request, it will avoid segfault
in case that calling ecore_wl_window_buffer_attach() before
ecore_wl_window_show().
SVN revision: 82384
count is type 'int', but used as unsigned it (always > 0), however gcc
can't understand that and is complaining that 'check' could be used
without being initialized... which is false. Make the test != 0 to
silent gcc and make code as correct as before.
SVN revision: 82369
This warning was removed but I left the _edje_real_part_state_get() in
there as this will not just get the part state, but also call
_edje_part_recalc() if needed.
Should we completely remove the block, or is _edje_part_recalc() required?
SVN revision: 82366
When an extra argument didn't match, instead of going to the next signal
handler we were skiping to next extra match argument because we were
calling "continue" inside EINA_INLIST_FOREACH.
Patch by: José Roberto de Souza <zehortigoza@profusion.mobi>
SVN revision: 82351