dont delete the obj during finalize... just retyurn NULL to fail.
fork() failed for me so i found this... ask not why fork failed... but
it did... and thus found this error handling case.
@fix
enlightenment internal windows insta segv e on rpi. after much hunting
it seems a fallback is happening and bunk ptrs are being used. this at
least will make the problems more reliable with null ptrs.
Turns out the "device_open" function pretty much just tests calloc
functionality, and doesn't open any device. So let's allocate a
tiny bo and discard it to make sure we're actually on exynos.
The engage feature was mainly there as a demo of the capabilities of bryce. Now that we are nearing release we need to clean up our gadgets. The engage style for the luncher gadget is not complete, and does not work adequately, and quite honestly better belongs as a feature of bryce itself not luncher.
We needed to do this to prevent burning cpu with animated cursors
before we did frame callback based animating.
Now the compositor will stop our frame callbacks when our cursor
is implicitly visible when the pointer isn't over our window,
so we don't have to use window hides for it.
a canvas can have multiple objects with the same name. assuming that name:obj
is a 1:1 ratio means that name-finding functions are likely to return invalid
objects
@fix
Summary:
Function argument was renamed, but in function body still uses old
variable name.
Test Plan: Build on Windows host
Reviewers: cedric, vtorri
Reviewed By: vtorri
Subscribers: jpeg
Tags: #windows, #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5152
An ugly const char * is returned from strdup, freed later with a custom
function that just calls free(). This was probably intended for
stringshare but now free is used. We have to fix the free function for
the EO API so let's keep free(). I'd rather avoid declaring
elm_config_profile_dir_free in the EO files.
This makes the icon test actually work. Otherwise the icon data is too
big and basically seems ignored by the compositor or X.
Note: In E (X11) it seems that the window icon remains unchanged? xprop
shows the proper data, though. Ping @zmike.
Note: The distinction is made on how the window was created, not on
which API is used (evas_object_lower or efl_gfx_stack_lower or
elm_win_lower).
Ref T5322
See the previous commits. All focus_highlight APIs are defined in the
Widget class but only implemented at the Window level. For consistency I
believe this call should also be forwarded to the window. The previous
logic had absolutely no effect at all, except storing a stringshare.
The day focus_highlight becomes widget-specific (i.e. each widget has
its own highlight style) then this can be changed.
Note: This will apply to legacy API as well.
Ref T5363
Note: elm_test "Focus Style" can be used to test this API. The test case
is a bit broken (overly complex EDC?) but if you're patient you can see
the difference between "glow" and "glow_effect".
Ref T5363
Ref T5322
I broke this in commit 1bb45f6e61
We intentionally *don't* flush in window_semi_free, as this could be
when there's no compositor left to flush to (in the case of session
recovery).
RGBA should be pretty clear for most cases but it does not cost us much
to document these values as well and make the documentation maybe easier
to understand for some people.