forked from enlightenment/efl
From: Vincent Torri <vtorri@univ-evry.fr>
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/eet/src/lib Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:54:04 +0200 (CEST) On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > I blame this one on raster funny to make a spelling mistake in a sentence where the word 'dictionnary' is used :) Vincent HOW RIGHT YOU ARE! SVN revision: 61912
This commit is contained in:
parent
be17bbd121
commit
f9dc75a538
|
@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@ eet_data_descriptor3_new(const Eet_Data_Descriptor_Class *eddc);
|
|||
* a network or more.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function specially ignores str_direct_alloc and str_direct_free. It
|
||||
* is useful when the eet_data you are reading doesn't have a dictionnary,
|
||||
* is useful when the eet_data you are reading doesn't have a dictionary,
|
||||
* like network stream or IPC. It also mean that all string will be allocated
|
||||
* and duplicated in memory.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ _eet_descriptor_hash_find(Eet_Data_Descriptor *edd,
|
|||
|
||||
if (!edd->elements.hash.buckets[hash].element)
|
||||
return NULL; /*
|
||||
When we use the dictionnary as a source for chunk name, we will always
|
||||
When we use the dictionary as a source for chunk name, we will always
|
||||
have the same pointer in name. It's a good idea to just compare pointer
|
||||
instead of running strcmp on both string.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ eet_flush2(Eet_File *ef)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* write dictionnary */
|
||||
/* write dictionary */
|
||||
if (ef->ed)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int offset = strings_offset;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue