diff options
author | Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es> | 2018-05-25 10:23:59 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | apache <apache@e5-web1.enlightenment.org> | 2018-05-25 10:23:59 -0700 |
commit | 67539c96933e81d298e25ecdc4bc60c83a39ed16 (patch) | |
tree | 986c82b4af3bddd25e7ad3f0aa4e317b524e5089 /pages | |
parent | a8f182fe2e4fe09cbce0331f0e03b761578ed65b (diff) |
Wiki page eo-intro.md changed with summary [Updated to efl_new] by Xavi Artigas
Diffstat (limited to 'pages')
-rw-r--r-- | pages/develop/tutorials/c/eo-intro.md.txt | 76 |
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/pages/develop/tutorials/c/eo-intro.md.txt b/pages/develop/tutorials/c/eo-intro.md.txt index 0d3767676..9df289b75 100644 --- a/pages/develop/tutorials/c/eo-intro.md.txt +++ b/pages/develop/tutorials/c/eo-intro.md.txt | |||
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ | |||
4 | 4 | ||
5 | # Introduction to Eo: Creating and Destroying Objects # | 5 | # Introduction to Eo: Creating and Destroying Objects # |
6 | 6 | ||
7 | The Eo generic object system was designed to provide *Object-Oriented capabilities* to EFL. Eo objects are at the core of almost every EFL entity (like Windows, Buttons or Timers) providing lifecycle management and inheritance abilities amongst other features. | 7 | EFL is written in C and therefore lacks language support for [Object-oriented programming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming). |
8 | The Eo generic object system was designed to provide such capabilities to EFL. Eo objects are at the core of almost every EFL entity (like Windows, Buttons or Timers) providing lifecycle management and inheritance abilities amongst other features. | ||
8 | 9 | ||
9 | This tutorial shows you the basics of creating and destroying Eo objects as well as *Reference Counting*, the technique at the heart of the Eo object lifecycle management. | 10 | This tutorial shows you the basics of creating and destroying Eo objects as well as *Reference Counting*, the technique at the heart of the Eo object lifecycle management. |
10 | 11 | ||
11 | This tutorial is more theoretical than practical however the concepts being explained are crucial, so it's highly advisable to go through it. If you're familiar with Reference Counting, you should have no trouble. | 12 | This tutorial is more theoretical than practical however the concepts being explained are crucial, so it's highly advisable to go through it. If you're familiar with Reference Counting, you should have no trouble at all. |
12 | 13 | ||
13 | ## Prerequisites ## | 14 | ## Prerequisites ## |
14 | 15 | ||
@@ -70,26 +71,26 @@ static void | |||
70 | _obj_create() | 71 | _obj_create() |
71 | { | 72 | { |
72 | // First create a root element | 73 | // First create a root element |
73 | _root = efl_add(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, NULL, | 74 | _root = efl_new(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, |
74 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); | 75 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); |
75 | } | 76 | } |
76 | ``` | 77 | ``` |
77 | 78 | ||
78 | ``efl_add()`` is one of the most commonly-used methods in EFL so it requires careful inspection. It mainly does **three** separate things: | 79 | ``efl_new()`` is the most basic of the object creation methods. It does three things: |
79 | 80 | ||
80 | * Creates a new object of the type (**class**) specified in the first parameter. | 81 | * Creates a new object of the type (**class**) specified in the first parameter and returns a pointer to it. |
81 | * Sets the new object as a child of the already existing object specified in the second parameter. | 82 | * Calls any constructor method defined for the object's class. |
82 | * Calls a list of methods to further initialize or configure the new object. | 83 | * Calls a list of methods to further initialize or configure the new object. |
83 | 84 | ||
84 | In the code snippet above an object of type ``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS`` is created, as a child of nothing (the ``NULL`` parameter) and ``efl_name_set()`` is then used to configure the object (as explained below). | 85 | In the code snippet above an object of type ``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS`` is created, and ``efl_name_set()`` is then used to configure the object (as explained below). |
85 | 86 | ||
86 | Note that the specific type of object being created in this tutorial (``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS``) is not important. It was chosen because it does not need configuration and is therefore easier to use. | 87 | Note that the specific type of object being created in this tutorial (``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS``) is not important. It was chosen because it does not need configuration and is therefore easier to use. |
87 | 88 | ||
88 | You can use as many configuration calls inside ``efl_add()`` as you need, since it accepts an infinite number of parameters. Also, configuration calls can use the special symbol ``efl_added`` which refers to the object being created. Together these two powerful features make object creation code much more compact. You can create an object, configure it and add it to a scene without even requiring a variable to store it. | 89 | You can use as many configuration calls inside ``efl_new()`` as you need, since it accepts an infinite number of parameters. Also, configuration calls can use the special symbol ``efl_added`` which refers to the object being created. Together these two powerful features make object creation code much more compact. |
89 | 90 | ||
90 | In this example, ``efl_name_set()`` is used to name the new object "Root" (note the ``efl_added`` parameter being used). | 91 | In this example, ``efl_name_set()`` is used to name the new object "Root" (note the ``efl_added`` parameter being used). |
91 | 92 | ||
92 | The return value of ``efl_add()`` is the new object with type ``Eo *``, which you can safely assign to a pointer of the specific type you requested or keep as the generic ``Eo *``. In this case the pointer is stored in the ``_root`` variable for later use. | 93 | The return value of ``efl_new()`` is the new object with type ``Eo *``, which you can safely assign to a pointer of the specific type you requested or keep it as the generic ``Eo *``. In this case the pointer is stored in the ``_root`` variable for later use. |
93 | 94 | ||
94 | At this point you have created your first Eo object. It is now time to decide who will be responsible for destroying it later. If the object is not destroyed system resources will eventually be exhausted. This is known as a *memory leak*. | 95 | At this point you have created your first Eo object. It is now time to decide who will be responsible for destroying it later. If the object is not destroyed system resources will eventually be exhausted. This is known as a *memory leak*. |
95 | 96 | ||
@@ -97,24 +98,15 @@ At this point you have created your first Eo object. It is now time to decide wh | |||
97 | 98 | ||
98 | In the simplest case when only one piece of code is interacting with an object, you can create the object, use it and then destroy it. In more complex scenarios where different parts of code use the same object, it's not easy to know when an object isn't in use anymore and can therefore be safely destroyed. | 99 | In the simplest case when only one piece of code is interacting with an object, you can create the object, use it and then destroy it. In more complex scenarios where different parts of code use the same object, it's not easy to know when an object isn't in use anymore and can therefore be safely destroyed. |
99 | 100 | ||
100 | A common approach to this problem is to use the **Reference Counting** technique whereby every object keeps track of how many people (pieces of code) are using it, using an internal *reference counter*: | 101 | A common approach to this problem is to use the **Reference Counting** technique whereby every object keeps track of how many people (pieces of code) are using it, using an internal *reference counter* (*refcount* for short): |
101 | 102 | ||
102 | * When somebody wants to work with a particular object it first needs to *obtain a reference* by using a call like ``efl_ref()`` on the object. This increments the internal reference counter. | 103 | * ``efl_new()`` returns a new object with a reference counter of 1, meaning that the object is currently in use by one person: you, the caller of ``efl_new()``. |
104 | * If somebody else wants to work with that object it first needs to *obtain a reference* by using a call like ``efl_ref()`` on the object. This increments the internal reference counter. | ||
103 | * When that piece of code is done working with the object it *returns the reference* by calling ``efl_unref()`` on the object in question. This decrements the internal reference counter. | 105 | * When that piece of code is done working with the object it *returns the reference* by calling ``efl_unref()`` on the object in question. This decrements the internal reference counter. |
104 | 106 | ||
105 | The advantage of this technique is that objects can automatically be destroyed when their internal reference counter reaches 0 as no one else is using them. | 107 | The advantage of this technique is that objects can automatically be destroyed when their internal reference counter reaches 0 as no one else is using them. |
106 | 108 | ||
107 | ### Reference Counting and efl_add() ### | 109 | Back to the tutorial code, you obtained an object using ``efl_new()`` with a refcount of 1, therefore you need to return that reference at some point. It is time to fill-in the ``_obj_destroy()`` method: |
108 | |||
109 | Eo objects created through ``efl_add()`` have a starting reference count of 1, meaning that only one piece of code is using them. **You must know which code this is** as it will be responsible for returning the reference. This is very easy to do. | ||
110 | |||
111 | * **If you assigned the object a parent** then said parent is the owner of the reference. There's nothing else that you need to do with the object. You cannot actually work with the object because you do not hold any reference to it (more about this later). | ||
112 | * **If you gave no parent to the object**: If you passed ``NULL`` as the parent, then **you** are the owner of the reference and you are responsible for returning it with ``efl_unref()``. Forgetting to do so is the most common cause of memory leaks. | ||
113 | |||
114 | > **NOTE:** | ||
115 | > Parenthood does need to be permanent in EFL: you can always remove a child object from its parent using ``efl_unparent()``. Be careful, though, because this returns to you the reference the parent was holding. **You are now responsible for returning this reference**, and failing to do so will leak the object. If you want to remove the object from its parent **and** return the reference at the same time, you can use the convenience method ``efl_del()``. | ||
116 | |||
117 | Back to the tutorial code, no parent was given to the object created in ``_obj_create()``, therefore you need to return that reference at some point. It is time to fill-in the ``_obj_destroy()`` method: | ||
118 | 110 | ||
119 | ```c | 111 | ```c |
120 | static void | 112 | static void |
@@ -128,7 +120,7 @@ _obj_destroy() | |||
128 | 120 | ||
129 | The reference you were holding to the ``_root`` object has now returned. Since it was the only existing reference to this object, the internal reference counter will reach 0 and the object will be destroyed. This isn't immediately obvious but you will explore this process further in the next tutorial. | 121 | The reference you were holding to the ``_root`` object has now returned. Since it was the only existing reference to this object, the internal reference counter will reach 0 and the object will be destroyed. This isn't immediately obvious but you will explore this process further in the next tutorial. |
130 | 122 | ||
131 | The first step of the tutorial is now complete. You may not have seen much on screen but now understand the fundamental concept of **Object Lifecycle Management**: when objects are created and destroyed. | 123 | The first step of the tutorial is now complete. You may not have seen much on screen but you now understand the fundamental concept of **Object Lifecycle Management**: when objects are created and destroyed. |
132 | 124 | ||
133 | See below the complete listing, which you can build and run yourself: | 125 | See below the complete listing, which you can build and run yourself: |
134 | 126 | ||
@@ -148,7 +140,7 @@ static void | |||
148 | _obj_create() | 140 | _obj_create() |
149 | { | 141 | { |
150 | // First create a root element | 142 | // First create a root element |
151 | _root = efl_add(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, NULL, | 143 | _root = efl_new(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, |
152 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); | 144 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); |
153 | } | 145 | } |
154 | 146 | ||
@@ -178,7 +170,7 @@ EFL_MAIN() | |||
178 | 170 | ||
179 | ## Step Two: A More Complex Hierarchy ## | 171 | ## Step Two: A More Complex Hierarchy ## |
180 | 172 | ||
181 | In this second section more objects will be added, forming a hierarchy. This will give you more hands-on training with the concepts you acquired in the previous stection. | 173 | In this second section more objects will be created as children of other objects, forming a hierarchy. This will give you more hands-on training with the concepts you acquired in the previous section. |
182 | 174 | ||
183 | Start by adding two more global object pointers to keep track of the new objects. Just below the ``#includes``, replace the ``Eo *_root;`` line with: | 175 | Start by adding two more global object pointers to keep track of the new objects. Just below the ``#includes``, replace the ``Eo *_root;`` line with: |
184 | 176 | ||
@@ -186,7 +178,7 @@ Start by adding two more global object pointers to keep track of the new objects | |||
186 | Eo *_root, *_child1, *_child2; | 178 | Eo *_root, *_child1, *_child2; |
187 | ``` | 179 | ``` |
188 | 180 | ||
189 | Next, in the ``_obj_create()`` method add a new ``efl_add()`` line below the previous one: | 181 | Next, in the ``_obj_create()`` method add these lines below the call to ``efl_new()``: |
190 | 182 | ||
191 | ```c | 183 | ```c |
192 | // Create the first child element | 184 | // Create the first child element |
@@ -194,7 +186,17 @@ Next, in the ``_obj_create()`` method add a new ``efl_add()`` line below the pre | |||
194 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Child1")); | 186 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Child1")); |
195 | ``` | 187 | ``` |
196 | 188 | ||
197 | Here you are creating a new object (of type ``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS``, again) and setting its parent to ``_root``. As you learned in the previous section, since you are assigning the object a parent, its only reference now belongs to said parent. This means you don't need to worry about returning it. It also means that you won't be able to work with this object later on. In fact, you don't event need to keep the ``_child1`` pointer. It exists because you will be using it in the following tutorial. | 189 | ``efl_add()`` is one of the most commonly-used methods in EFL so it requires careful inspection. It works the same way ``efl_new()`` does (it creates and initializes a new object), and it then gives the new object a **parent**. This means that the only reference to the new object **belongs to the parent**, so you don't need to worry about returning it. It also means that you won't be able to work with this object later on unless you obtain an extra reference. In fact, you don't event need to keep the ``_child1`` pointer. It exists because you will be using it in the following tutorial. |
190 | |||
191 | As you can see, ``efl_add()`` is very convenient since it allows you to create an object, configure it and add it to a hierarchy without even requiring a variable to store it. | ||
192 | |||
193 | > **NOTE:** | ||
194 | > | ||
195 | > Parenthood does not need to be permanent in EFL: you can always remove a child object from its parent using ``efl_parent_set(obj, NULL)``. Be careful, though, because this returns to you the reference the parent was holding. **You are now responsible for returning this reference**, and failing to do so will leak the object. If you want to remove the object from its parent **and** return the reference at the same time, you can use the convenience method ``efl_del()``. | ||
196 | > | ||
197 | > Likewise, you can assign an object to a parent using ``efl_parent_set(obj, parent)``. This steals the reference from you and gives it to the new parent. | ||
198 | |||
199 | In the above code snippet, you are creating a new object (of type ``EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS``, again) and setting its parent to ``_root``, so from this point onwards you can forget about this object: its parent will take care of it. | ||
198 | 200 | ||
199 | Now add a second object immediately below the previous one: | 201 | Now add a second object immediately below the previous one: |
200 | 202 | ||
@@ -204,7 +206,13 @@ Now add a second object immediately below the previous one: | |||
204 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Child2")); | 206 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Child2")); |
205 | ``` | 207 | ``` |
206 | 208 | ||
207 | This time you didn't use ``efl_add()`` but ``efl_add_ref()``. This method creates objects with an initial reference count of 2, one reference for the parent and one for you. This is handy when you want the object to have a parent but also want to work with it. Obviously, you will need to return the extra reference later on. | 209 | This time you didn't use ``efl_add()`` but ``efl_add_ref()``. This method creates objects with an initial reference count of 2, one reference for the parent and one for you. This is handy when you want the object to have a parent but also want to work with it. You will need to return your extra reference later on, and the parent will return its own reference. |
210 | |||
211 | > **NOTE:** | ||
212 | > | ||
213 | > ``efl_add_ref()`` accepts ``NULL`` as parent. In this case, it behaves exactly like ``efl_new()`` and returns an object with a single reference. | ||
214 | > | ||
215 | > ``efl_add()`` does **not** accept ``NULL`` as parent and will show an error message at runtime if you try. | ||
208 | 216 | ||
209 | In this simple tutorial you will not be doing anything special with ``_child2``: It has been created with an extra reference for example purposes only. | 217 | In this simple tutorial you will not be doing anything special with ``_child2``: It has been created with an extra reference for example purposes only. |
210 | 218 | ||
@@ -216,7 +224,7 @@ Next, move on to the ``_obj_destroy()`` method. You need to return the extra ref | |||
216 | efl_unref(_child2); | 224 | efl_unref(_child2); |
217 | ``` | 225 | ``` |
218 | 226 | ||
219 | Note how you are **not** returning the reference to ``_child1``. This is because that reference belongs to its parent, ``_root``, which handles it. In this example when ``_root`` is destroyed it will also return the references for all its children. This in turn destroys ``_child1`` because there was only one reference to it but **not** ``_child2`` because there is an extra reference to it. You will manually return this with an explicit call to ``efl_unref()``). | 227 | Note how you are **not** returning the reference to ``_child1``. This is because that reference belongs to its parent, ``_root``, which handles it. In this example when ``_root`` is destroyed it will also return the references for all its children. This in turn destroys ``_child1`` because there was only one reference to it but **not** ``_child2`` because there is an extra reference to it. You will manually return this with an explicit call to ``efl_unref()``. |
220 | 228 | ||
221 | If you compile and run the complete code below you will only see messages about objects being deleted but in so doing you've learned about the very important topic of object creation and destruction, as well as how to avoid memory leaks. | 229 | If you compile and run the complete code below you will only see messages about objects being deleted but in so doing you've learned about the very important topic of object creation and destruction, as well as how to avoid memory leaks. |
222 | 230 | ||
@@ -236,7 +244,7 @@ static void | |||
236 | _obj_create() | 244 | _obj_create() |
237 | { | 245 | { |
238 | // First create a root element | 246 | // First create a root element |
239 | _root = efl_add(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, NULL, | 247 | _root = efl_new(EFL_MODEL_ITEM_CLASS, |
240 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); | 248 | efl_name_set(efl_added, "Root")); |
241 | 249 | ||
242 | // Create the first child element | 250 | // Create the first child element |
@@ -280,10 +288,10 @@ EFL_MAIN() | |||
280 | 288 | ||
281 | At the end of this tutorial you have learned: | 289 | At the end of this tutorial you have learned: |
282 | 290 | ||
283 | * Objects are **created** with ``efl_add()``. | 291 | * **Standalone** (parent-less) objects are created with ``efl_new()``. You must manually destroy these objects using ``efl_unref()``. |
284 | * ``efl_add()`` creates objects with **one reference**, which belongs to their parent. You don't have to do anything to destroy the objects. | 292 | * ``efl_add()`` creates objects which **belong to their parent**. You don't have to do anything to destroy the objects. |
285 | * If you do not provide a parent to ``efl_add()`` then the reference belongs to **you**, and you have to return it when you are done working with the object using ``efl_unref()``. | 293 | * Objects can be created with an **extra reference** with ``efl_add_ref()``, which is useful if you want to give the object a parent and also start working with it right away. You must return the extra reference using ``efl_unref()``. |
286 | * Objects can be created with an **extra reference** with ``efl_add_ref()``, which is useful if you want to give the object a parent and also start working with it right away. | 294 | * The parent of an object can be **changed** at any time using ``efl_parent_set()``. Be careful with object ownership if you do so. |
287 | 295 | ||
288 | The following tutorial builds on top of this one, adding instrumentation calls to display the actual values of the different reference counters. | 296 | The following tutorial builds on top of this one, adding instrumentation calls to display the actual values of the different reference counters. |
289 | 297 | ||