forked from enlightenment/efl
66402 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 3e78c99242 |
ecore_imf_evas: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_IMF_EVAS_API in Ecore IMF Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 5e6945397f |
ecore_sdl: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_SDL_API in Ecore SDL library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 24b6b8f459 |
ecore_wayland: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_WAYLAND_API in Ecore Wayland library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 4867816835 |
ecore_wl2: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_WL2_API in Ecore WL2 library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 6cd5fd7291 |
ethumb_client: Rename EAPI macro to ETHUMB_CLIENT_API in Ethumb Client library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 72e7a9f951 |
ephysics: Rename EAPI macro to EPHYSICS_API in Ephysics library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | dc775bf8cb |
efl_canvas_wl: Rename EAPI macro to EFL_CANVAS_WL_API in Efl Canvas WL library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 64719a4116 |
ecore_input: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_INPUT_API in Ecore Input library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 2340baf476 |
ecore_buffer: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_BUFFER_API in Ecore Buffer library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | ca50bab09e |
ecore_cocoa: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_COCOA_API in Ecore Cocoa library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 00246298a0 |
ecore_evas: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_EVAS_API in Ecore Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 33b59d04d0 |
ecore_fb: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_FB_API in Ecore FB library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 4d1c4bf1b3 |
ecore_file: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_FILE_API in Ecore File library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 941dbde5e7 |
ecore_imf: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_IMF_API in Ecore IMF library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 2c3e8e26ef |
ecore_input_evas: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_INPUT_EVAS_API in Ecore Input Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 1984a1a2fb |
ecore_ipc: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_IPC_API in Ecore IPC library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 7c933562d9 |
eet: Rename EAPI macro to EET_API in Eet library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | c0e42a3bf4 |
efreet: Rename EAPI macro to EFREET_API in Efreet library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | f0d3585e78 |
ecore_win32: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_WIN32_API in Ecore Win32 library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | a6c6965292 |
emile: Rename EAPI macro to EMILE_API in Emile library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 819ab93f8b |
eeze_api: Rename EAPI macro to EEZE_API in Eeze library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 8dee56dfbb |
elput: Rename EAPI macro to ELPUT_API in Elput library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | d222e43b07 |
elua: Rename EAPI macro to ELUA_API in Elua library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 856798774d |
embryo: Rename EAPI macro to EMBRYO_API in Embryo library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 7b8abe6f85 |
ethumb: Rename EAPI macro to ETHUMB_API in Ethumb library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 0b75e82b3d |
ecore_drm2: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_DRM2_API in Ecore DRM2 library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 4a6882c2fd |
ecore_avahi: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_AVAHI_API in Ecore Avahi library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 95c2248065 |
ecore_drm: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_DRM_API in Ecore DRM library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 7948b204bc |
ecore_x: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_X_API in Ecore X library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 300cc7dcf6 |
edje_cxx: Remove useless EAPI definition
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 62f87b69da |
edje: Rename EAPI macro to EDJE_API in Edje library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | a594413ccb |
elementary: Rename EAPI macro to ELM_API in Elementary library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 0d39e71f38 |
eina_cxx: Rename EAPI macro to EINA_CXX_TEST_API in Einna C++ tests
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 50a6a1b83b |
edje_cxx: Edje.hh depends on already set EAPI, explicitly define
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. So we can remove EAPI from other libraries, we need to make this library non-dependent on this symbol being already defined. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | dc8ece8c41 |
modules: Rename EAPI macro to MODAPI for modules
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 5d43dd2b24 |
efl_mono: Rename EAPI macro to EFL_MONO_API in efl mono binding
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 72f5e7d7ad |
edje: Add weak symbol
The symbols will be needed when we change how Eolian generates import/export symbols in Eio |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 19bb35fa0a |
elementary: Remove use of EOAPI that will get its definition removed
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 48e059c5a6 |
efl: Rename EAPI macro to EFL_API in Efl sub-library
evil: Rename EAPI macro to EVIL_API in Evil library Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | b0f5c73ea3 |
ecore: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_API in Ecore library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | e8e39e5fea |
eldbus: Rename EAPI macro to ELDBUS_API in Eldbus library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | f47e469247 |
emotion: emotion EAPI macro to EMOTION_API in Emotion library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 4f3fbec6c9 |
ector: Rename EAPI macro to ECTOR_API in Ector library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | d688766d0f |
ecore_con: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_CON_API in Ecore Con library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 2fa81c36b5 |
evas: Rename EAPI macro to EVAS_API in Evas library
evil: Rename EAPI macro to EVIL_API in Evil library Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 7b02a3290f |
ecore_audio: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_AUDIO_API in Ecore Audio library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 872ce2022b |
eio: Rename EAPI macro to EIO_API in Eio library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | fd87bcf808 |
eo: Rename EAPI macro to EO_API in Eo library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | e1e62a5203 |
eldbus: Add Eldbus.h entry point header
Add Eldbus.h so we can have EAPI definition |
|
Felipe Magno de Almeida | 1ffabc6391 |
eio: Add weak symbol
The symbols will be needed when we change how Eolian generates import/export symbols in Eio |