forked from enlightenment/rage
DnD printf() is very verbose, could we consider not having it in?
Summary: When doing other patches, I was constantly distracted by this printf and I couldn't see a purpose for having it in there. You may reject this patch if you want, but I think it warrants some thought :) Reviewers: etrunko, raster Projects: #rage Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D1483 Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1184dbf66
commit
b4e10e4c5a
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ _cb_drag_leave(void *data EINA_UNUSED, Evas_Object *o EINA_UNUSED)
|
||||||
void
|
void
|
||||||
_cb_drag_pos(void *data EINA_UNUSED, Evas_Object *o EINA_UNUSED, Evas_Coord x, Evas_Coord y, Elm_Xdnd_Action action)
|
_cb_drag_pos(void *data EINA_UNUSED, Evas_Object *o EINA_UNUSED, Evas_Coord x, Evas_Coord y, Elm_Xdnd_Action action)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
printf("dnd at %i %i act:%i\n", x, y, action);
|
/* printf("dnd at %i %i act:%i\n", x, y, action); */
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int
|
static int
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue