The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Especially to note, that when giving a message to send, the caller
do not own it anymore and should not unref it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6092
Delaying teardown might result in code expecting parent to still be valid,
especially call to efl_provider_find won't work anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6083
This reverts commit 2fb5cc3ad0.
Most of this change where wrong as they didn't affect the destruction
of the object. efl_add_ref allow for manual handling of the lifecycle
of the object and make sure it is still alive during destructor. efl_add
will not allow you to access an object after invalidate also efl.parent.get
will always return NULL once the object is invalidated.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6062
Summary:
i) There have been 2 sorts of errors, first the items have been deleted
after the list was deleted, thus the list items have already been
destructed. which lead to the error as the popup items destroyed the list
items on destruction as well.
ii) sd->box was attached to the ctxpopup when getting into group_del the
box has already been destroyed by the cleanup logic.
Subscribers: cedric, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6166
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Plain conversion to IEnumerable, which is the base of LINQ
Depends on D6189
Reviewers: felipealmeida, vitor.sousa
Reviewed By: vitor.sousa
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6190
Summary:
As futures are tied to a given promises and are usually handled in
a 'attach and forget' scheme, we can't cancel them as it would cancel
the whole chain.
Reviewers: felipealmeida, vitor.sousa
Reviewed By: vitor.sousa
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6189
Summary:
this mimics other engines, all of which have the same mechanics due
to display server interactions. it also avoids unnecessary recalcs before
pre-render if the canvas size was changing repeatedly
fix T6924
ref D6019
Reviewers: cedric, JackDanielZ
Reviewed By: JackDanielZ
Subscribers: #committers, JackDanielZ
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T6924
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6145
This is a batch of changes renaming classes/types/etc to prevent
namespace related conflcits in our tree, with the ultimate goal
being enabling more static analysis on your eo files.
This is accomplished mostly by flattening the namespaces.