the property should not exist. if something is not supported then do not
inherit from this interface. If something wants to use the button
theme, then this can be easily used via API.
In legacy we already have the situation that things inherit from the
button class. To solve this, the enabled call is disabled on those
widgets, and disable every time it is called.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8805
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8135
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
If we are to choose Efl.Ui.I18n for the internationalization support, the localization API
should be named accordingly L10n.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7507
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Layout namespace is removed to keep consistency with other
widgets.
Consequently, "Efl.Ui.Layout.Object" is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout" and
"Efl.Ui.Layout." is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout_".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers, SanghyeonLee, woohyun
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7291
Summary:
What happened before is that we registered efl_ui_leyout_legacy for
"elm_layout", which is not that good, since checking a (lets say) elm_button, for the type "elm_layout" would result in false. The same is with elm_button.
fixes T7081
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7081
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6430
Summary:
when set/unset icon and text,
signal "elm,state,[part],visible/hidden" is emitted.
This is wrong because visible/hidden should be handled by
Efl.Gfx.visible, not Efl.Text nor Efl.Content.
This should be changed into elm,state,[part],set/unset"
All relating edc should be fixed.
Test Plan: run elementary_test->button, Efl.Ui.Button
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5798
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Also implement markup_set/get for:
- Efl.Ui.Frame
- Efl.Ui.Slider
Users may choose between text_set/get and markup_set/get, depending on
whether they want to escape their text or not.
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Marcel Hollerbach
WooHyun Jung
Mike Blumenkrantz
Xavi Artigas
Cedric BAIL
Yeongjong Lee
Jaehyun Cho
Woochanlee
Sungtaek Hong
Amitesh Singh
Jean-Philippe Andre
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Hirt